Comentários do leitor

Is Bluehost worth it?

por Damian August (2019-12-08)

No matter how strikingly original your site idea is or how visually attractive the layout; the content might be researched and user friendly, but these would amount to nothing if you can't keep the page online. Because of this, web hosting providers play a significant (possibly even the most important) function when you're deciding to construct your site. Currently, the market for this kind of services is quite wealthy and one of the largest competitors in this subject is Bluehost. It's undoubtedly a giant name one of web hosting companies. Started by Matt Heaton at 2003, the American firm is among the most recognized of this type.
For this review, I've taken into consideration the offer they are bringing to the table, as well as my own experience together. I will start with the benefits and then analyze their drawbacks, suggesting a few advancements. The main question that I'm trying to answer is"Can Bluehost live up to its prevalence ?"
What the customers take most interest in is, as you may have guessed, the speed of hosting. The relation goes like that: when the server functions at a high rate, the page loads quickly. I have analyzed the loading speed of my WordPress site I have on Bluehost by using the software Dotcom Monitor. Firstly, I would like to say my page involves a 1000 words post with 6 pictures, and uses JavaScript, HTML and CSS formatting. The results speaks for themselves. 0.9 megabytes of articles were loaded in 1.6 seconds. I would say the numbers are pretty satisfying.
As a potential customer, making the most of your money is a priority. Contrary to other suppliers with comparable bundles, such as"InterServer", Bluehost does not offer 1 month of free subscription. However, in the long term, their cost shows actually marginally lower than that of the rival companies', now being 2.67$/ month. Furthermore, they claim to have reduced it substantially from 7.99$. So it seems to be quite a good deal.
About everything you would need if you intend start your site.
Among the most important parameters are the uptime. That is the time that your server is going to continue to keep the page online. From my personal experience with them, I will say I haven't encountered any downtime and I've been using their services for nearly a year. The statistics appear to reflect the same performance. After testing their down time, the statistics reveal they may continue to keep your webpages up for 99,99% of their time over a single year. The lowest average live time of a page is 99.91% registered during October, once the care is scheduled. For reference purposes, a relatively good uptime would be an average of 99.94percent annual. A negligible gap, right? Well, not quite. If you calculate the true time, an average server is off for about 312 minutes per year, whereas Bluehost's is away for only 53. As seen, Buehost provides more than satisfying uptime.

Beginner friendly

If you are planning to begin your first site, WordPress would be one of the first options which may come to your head, since it's absolutely free, easily customizable applications, designed to suit your idea of an ideal page. If you choose it, you might want to know that Bluehost is the recommended web hosting solution by because 2005. What does that mean? By picking Bluehost Review, your new page can benefit of an assortment of interesting WordPress attributes. I will briefly present every of these below.
WordPress is installed automatically, so you can start making your website straight away.
Since security comes first, when you have created your WordPress hosting accounts, you'll have the ability to choose your login credentials, instead of logging in using the conventional password and admin.

There are various plug-ins and original topics tailored to your particular page that you need to make, which makes it not only really practical, but also aesthetically pleasuring.
Although WordPress hosting is that their number one recommendation, Bluehost has far more to offer. Among their hosting services, the following are worth mentioning:
Shared hosting to help new-born sites with less visitors usage shared resources;
Dedicated server hosting, even if you want a host to maintain your private resources. This is the best idea for webpages with more traffic volume.
Cloud Hosting which proves very useful in case that the server is down, as your webpage will be able to switch to another one
WooCommerce hosting that is the ideal plugin to use if you are planning to open a virtual shop
Virtual Private Server, which means one physical server is divided into numerous digital ones. It's perfect for clients who don't need to share their sources, but cannot manage employing a dedicated host.
Many plug-ins to put in
Even though there are a variety of plug-ins to select from, as I stated above, a number of them are not optional if you would like to make the most of your website. To some users, it may be annoying to have to set up them.

Paid add-ons

Unfortunately, the earlier mentioned plug-ins are not free, either. Because of this, the company was accused of attempting hardly to convince the clients buy something that is essential to get a page that is operational.
To conclude, I'd say that Bluehost has more pros than cons, and for this reason, I would rate its functionality 8/10. The speed, bandwidth, versatility and the lower cost compared to its rival businesses' would definitely suggest it. Additionally, there are cons. Having to cover and install several necessary plug-ins can leave a bad taste in some customers' mouths, especially if their funding is tight. Coming back to the question I began with, I would say they provide quality solutions and strong functionality, which weigh harder than the downsides. Bluehost is worth using.