Frequentist probability in Japanese school curricula

Koji Otaki

Resumo


Many Japanese school mathematics teachers, policy-makers and researchers believe that probabilistic contents are difficult for most students to understand. In this study, I identify several reasons for the difficulty through an ecological analysis that is a part of a didactic analysis. This task is achieved through three research techniques: (a) constructing a reference epistemological model of probabilistic activities in terms of praxeology, (b) analysing probabilistic contents of Japanese school mathematics textbooks from the reference model and (c) identifying institutional conditions and constraints on the contents using the scale of levels of didactic codetermination. In current Japanese school mathematics, frequentist probability is hardly mentioned, whereas Laplacian probability comprises a large part of the curriculum of probability, although some generic conditions make the frequentist probability viable. This fact is related to the following three constraints: determinationism, theoricism and demathematisation of randomiser.

Palavras-chave


Frequentist probability; Japanese school curricula

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L. & Gascón, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on the teacher’s practice: The case of limits of functions at Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59 (1–3), 235–268.

Batanero, C. & Díaz, C. (2007). Meaning and understanding of mathematics: The case of probability. In J. P. Van Bendegen & K. François (Eds), Philosophical dimensions in mathematics education (pp. 107–127). Springer.

Batanero, C. & Sanchez, E. (2005). What is the nature of high school students’ conceptions and misconceptions about probability? In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 241–266). Springer.

Borovcnik, M. & Kapadia, R. (2014). A historical and philosophical perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 7–34). Springer.

Bosch, M. (2015). Doing research within the anthropological theory of the didactic: the case of School algebra. In S. J. Cho (Ed.). Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 51–69). Springer.

Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (edited and translated by N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland & V. Warfield). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chevallard, Y. (1992a). A theoretical approach to curricula. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 13(2/3), 215–230.

Chevallard, Y. (1992b). Fundamental concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. In R. Douady & A. Mercier (Eds.), Research in Didactique of mathematics, selected papers (pp. 131–167). La Pensée Sauvage.

Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In Bosch, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the IV Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21–30). Barcelona: FUNDEMI-IQS.

Chevallard, Y. & Bosch, M. (2014). Didactic transposition in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 170–174). Springer.

Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M. & Kim, S. (2015). What is a theory according to the anthropological theory of the didactic? In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the IX Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2614–2620). Prague, Czech Republic.

Chevallard, Y. & Sensevy, G. (2014). Anthropological approaches in mathematics education, French perspective. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 38–43). Springer.

Florensa I., Bosch, M. & Gascón, J. (2015). The epistemological dimension in didactics: Two problematic issues. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the IX Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2635–2641). Prague, Czech Republic.

García, F. J., Gascón, J., Ruiz Higueras, L. & Bosch, M. (2006). Mathematical modelling as a tool for the connection of school mathematics. ZDM International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 226–246.


Gascón, J. (2003). From the cognitive programme to the epistemological programme in didactics of mathematics: Two incommensurable scientific research programmes? For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(2), 44–55.

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z. G., Porter, T. M., Daston, L., Beatty, J. & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge University Press.

Hacking, I. (1975/2006). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge University Press.

Okamoto, K. et al. (2016). Mirai e Hirogaru Suugaku 2 [Mathematics extending toward future 2]. Osaka, JP: Keirinkan.

Okabe, K. et al. (2015). Koutougakkou Suugaku A [Mathematics in upper secondary schools A]. Tokyo, JP: Sūken-syuppan.

Polya G. (1957/2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method [second edition]. Prinston University Press.

Ruíz-Munzon, N., Bosch, M. & Gascón, J. (2013). Comparing approaches through a reference epistemological model: The case of school algebra. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIII Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2870–2879). Antalya, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.

Savard, A. (2014). Developing probabilistic thinking: What about people’s conceptions? In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 283–298). Springer.

Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 465–494). Macmillan Publishing Company.

Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52, 83–94.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i4p100-111

Métricas do artigo

Carregando Métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


INDEXADORES DA REVISTA