### Questioning the world by questioning the exam

#### Resumo

#### Palavras-chave

#### Texto completo:

PDF#### Referências

Barquero. B., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2013). The ecological dimension in the teaching of mathematical modelling at university. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 33(3), 307-338.

Barquero, B., & Bosch, M. (2015). Didactic engineering as a research methodology: From fundamental situations to study and research paths. In Task Design In Mathematics Education (pp. 249-272). Springer International Publishing.

Barquero, B., Bosch, M., & Romo, A. (2015). A study and research path on mathematical modelling for teacher education. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 809-815).

Bergqvist, E. (2007). Types of reasoning in university exams in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 348-370.

Chaachoua, H. (2010). La praxéologie comme modèle didactique pour la problématique EIAH. Etude de cas: la modélisation des connaissances des élèves (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Grenoble).

Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods, 3-17.

Chevallard, Y. (2002). Organiser I'etude. 3. ecologie & regulation. in J.-L. Dorier et al. (eds.), Actes de la 11e Ecole d'Ete de didactique des mathématiques, pp. 41-56. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 4) (pp. 21-30).

Chevallard, Y. (2015). Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: a case for an oncoming counter paradigm. In The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 173-187). Springer International Publishing.

García, F. & Higueras, L. R. (2005). Mathematical praxeologies of increasing complexity: variation systems modelling in secondary education. WORKING GROUP 13 Applications and modelling, 1645.

Grønbæk, N., Misfeldt, M., & Winsløw, C. (2009). Assessment and contract-like relationships in undergraduate mathematics education. In University science and mathematics education in transition (pp. 85-105). Springer US.

Florensa, I, Bosch, M., Gascón, J. (2016). SRP design in an elasticity course: the role of mathematic modelling. In First conference of International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics.

Frejd, P. (2013). Modes of modeling assessment – a literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 413-438.

Jessen, B. E. (2014). How can study and research paths contribute to the teaching of mathematics in an interdisciplinary settings?. In Annales de didactique et des sciences cognitives, 19, pp 199-224.

Jessen, B. E. (2015). What role do study and research activities play in the relation between research and education? In: M. Achiam & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Mathematics and Science: The relationships and disconnections between research and education. Papers from a doctoral course at the University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen: Department of Science Education.

Jessen, B. E., Holm, C. & Winsløw, C. (2015). Matematikudredningen. (Evaluation report). Copenhagen: Ministry of Education. http://www.ind.ku.dk/publikationer/inds_skriftserie/2015-42/

Jessen, B. E. (to appear). How to generate autonomous questioning in secondary mathematics teaching?

Ministry of Education (2013). Bekendtgørelse nummer 776 af 26/06/2013 – Bilag 37, Matematik C. Copenhagen: Ministry of Education.

Niss, M. (1993). Assessment in mathematics education and its effects: An introduction. In M. Niss (Ed.) Investigations into assessment in mathematics education: An ICMI study (1-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Rasmussen, K. (2016). The direction and autonomy of interdisciplinary study and research paths in teacher education. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 158-179.

Romberg, T. A. (1987) Measures of mathematical achievement. In T. A. Romberg & D. Stewart (Eds.), The monitoring of school mathematics: Background papers: Vol. 2. Implications from psychology outcomes of instructions. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23 (2), 145-166.

Serrano, L., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2010). Fitting models to data: The mathematising step in the modelling process. In Proceedings of CERME (Vol. 6, pp. 2-185).

Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: new questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1-7.

Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Moreno, L. D., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., ... & Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in mathematics education. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), ICME-13 Topical Surveys Book Series (pp. 1-38). Springer International Publishing.

Swan, M., & Burkhardt, H. (2012). A designer speaks: Designing assessment of performance in mathematics. Educational Designer: Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 2(5), 1–41.

Webb, N. L. (1992). Assessment of students’ knowledge of mathematics: Steps toward a theory. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 661-683.

Winsløw, C., Matheron, Y., & Mercier, A. (2013). Study and research courses as an epistemological model for didactics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(2), 267-284.

Winsløw, Carl (2015). Mathematical analysis in high school, a fundamental dilemma. In C. Bergsten & B. Sriraman (Eds.): Refractions of Mathematics Education: Festschrift for Eva Jablonka, pp. 197-213. Charlotte, NC, USA.

Winsløw, C. (2012). A comparative perspective on teacher collaboration: The cases of lesson study in Japan and of multidisciplinary teaching in Denmark. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 291-304). Dordrecht: Springer.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i4p127-141

#### Métricas do artigo

_{Metrics powered by PLOS ALM}

**INDEXADORES DA REVISTA**