Study on the issue of stare decisis in the context of the reform of the WTO Appellate Body

Authors

  • Yingjie Duo Lanzhou University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71591

Keywords:

WTO, DSB, Appellate Body, Following Precedent, Reforms

Abstract

From a "selection dilemma" to a complete shutdown, the Appellate Body has not yet resumed its normal functioning. The United States, as the initiator, has issued several reports emphasizing the problems of the Appellate Body to justify its actions, including a critique of the practice of stare decisis, which points to the problem of judicial law-making. Although the Appellate Body vehemently denies it, the practice of following precedent does in fact exist. By exploring the institutional reasons behind the precedent-setting practices of the Appellate Body and examining the reform proposals put forward by various countries, corresponding reform recommendations are made.

References

Sutherland, Peter D. (2000). Concluding the Uruguay Round---Creating the New Architecture of Trade for the Global Economy. Fordham International Law Journal, 24, 15-19.

Davey, William J. (2022). WTO Dispute Settlement: Crown Jewel or Costume Jewelry? World Trade Review , 21, no. 3, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000106.

Sun Jiaxun. (2022). The “law-making” dilemma of the World Trade Organization dispute settlement mechanism. International Law Research, 2022,(02):113-128.

Zhang Hua. (2019). Rethinking the Problem of “Judicial Lawmaking” in International Law. Contemporary Jurisprudence, 33(02), 137-149.

Cho Sungjoon. (2022). A Social Theory of Legal Precedent. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 31, 433-468.

Hu Jiaxiang. (2021). Mismatch and Reset of WTO's Legal Interpretation Power. Jurisprudence, (10), 181-192.

Peng Yue. (2019). WTO Dispute Settlement Report Precedent Value Controversy. Law Review, 37(06), 84-97. http://doi:10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2019.06.008.

Zhang Yuejiao. (2023). Reform of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Must Adhere to the Righteousness and Innovation. Tsinghua Law, 17(06), 82-107.

Cottier, Thomas. (2021). Recalibrating the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Towards New Standards of Appellate Review, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab024.

Liu, Tianshu. (2021). An analysis of the “precedent” effect of the Appellate Body of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. Journal of Xiangnan College, 42(04), 32-37.

Yang Guohua. (2019). Legal Issues in the WTO Appellate Body Crisis. Journal of International Law, 2019(1):14.

Gonzalo Villalta Puig & Ann Callahan. (2023). Reforming the World Trade Organization: Problems and Solutions. International Lawyer, 56(3), 417-446.

Zhang, Naigen. (2019). The Appellate Body's Treaty Interpretation Judgment or Precedent Discussion--Another Discussion on the Reform of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. International Economic Review, (02), 44-56+5.

Suarez, Maria Angelica. (2024). The Appellate Body Impasse: How to Make the WTO Great Again?. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 56(2), 965-980.

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Duo, Y. (2025). Study on the issue of stare decisis in the context of the reform of the WTO Appellate Body. Journal of International Law and Economic Globalization, 4(4-Ext), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71591