Em defesa do espírito de criação

Eric  Landowski

doi:10.23925/2763-700X.2022n4.60281

Authors

Eric Landowski Paris, C.N.R.S. — São Paulo, C.P.S.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2763-700X.2022n4.60281

Keywords:

création, fabrication, médiation, pratique vs utilisation, production, règle, régularité

Abstract

The article distinguishes two modes of production. Manufacturing (“fabrication”) consists in the application upon some material of predetermined algorithms functioning as rules of transformation ; these fixed programs ensure the production of predefined (standardised) objects. Creation, on the contrary, may be achieved neither by just respecting a rule or a set of rules, nor by just trangressing them. It does require to observe some existing rules (for instance of language), but in such a way that it lets them grant more than what they literally prescribe. This is what we call surpassing (“dépasser”) the rule. Instead of having a predefined mode of unilateral action (programmed by the rule) of the producer on the material at stake, it is the course of their interaction, along which the rule appears not anymore as a constraint but as a source of potential new forms, that determines the modality of their confrontation and its possibly “creative” result.

References

Calame, Claude, “L’homme en société et ses relations techniques avec l’environnement : ni nature ni Gaïa”, Les Possibles, 26, 15 décembbre 2020.

Geninasca, Jacques, “Pages inédites”, in E. Landowski (éd.), A la mémoire de Jacques Geninasca, Actes Sémiotiques, 115, 2012.

Greimas, Algirdas J., “Analyse sémiotique d’un discours juridique”, Sémiotique et sciences sociales, Paris, Seuil, 1976 ; trad. A. Lorencini e S. Nitrini, Semiótica e Ciências sociais, São Paulo, Cultrix, 1981.

— “Des accidents dans les sciences dites humaines”, in A.J. Greimas et E. Landowski (orgs.), Introduction à l’analyse du discours en sciences sociales, Paris, Hachette, 1979 ; trad. C.T. Pais, Introdução à análise do discurso em ciências sociais, São Paulo, Global,1986.

— “La soupe au pistou ou la construction d’un objet de valeur”, Actes Sémiotiques-Documents, I, 5, 1979 ; reed. in Du sens II, Paris, Seuil, 1983 ; trad. D. Ferreira da Cruz, in Do sentido II, São Paulo, EDUSP-Nanquim, 2014.

— De l’Imperfection, Périgueux, Fanlac, 1987 ; trad. A.C. de Oliveira, Da Imperfeição, São Paulo, Estação das Letras e Cores - Editora do CPS, 2ed. 2017.

— “Le beau geste”, Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 13,1-2, 1993.

Grignaffini, Giorgio, “Appunti per una sociosemiotica del giardinaggio”, Acta Semiotica, I, 1, 2021.

Landowski, Eric, “Unità del senso, pluralità di regimi”, in G. Marrone, N. Dusi, G. Le Feudo (orgs.), Narrazione ed esperienza. Intorno a una semiotica della vita quotidiana, Roma, Meltemi, 2007.

— “Avoir prise, donner prise”, Actes Sémiotiques, 112, 2009 ; trad. L. Silva, M. Scoz, Y. Fechine, “Antes da interação, a ligação”, São Paulo, CPS, 2019.

— “Voiture et peinture : de l’utilisation à la pratique”, Galáxia, 12, 2, 2012.

— “Jacques-le-Juste”, in A la mémoire de Jacques Geninasca, Actes Sémiotiques, 115, 2012.

— Com Greimas, São Paulo, Estação das Letras e Cores - Editora do CPS, 2017.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “A un jeune peintre”, Le regard éloigné, Paris, Plon, 1983 ; trad. port., Lisboa, Edições 70, 1986.

Marsciani, Francesco, “La fiamma della candela in Bachelard”, in G. Marrone (éd.), Sensi e discorso, Bologne, Esculapio, 1995.

Nastopka, Kestutis, “Le risque du sens dans la sémiotique de Lotman et celle de l’école de Greimas”, in N. Kersyte (org.), En quête de Greimas, Actes Sémiotiques, 112, 2009.

Scóz, Murilo, “Por uma abordagem sociossemiótica do design de interação”, Actes Sémiotiques, 121, 2018.