Electrophysiological diagnostic process in neonates after failure in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2026v38i2e74855

Keywords:

Neonates, Infants, Risk, Hearing, Hearing loss, Electrophysiology

Abstract

Introduction: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening is an important public health strategy to identify and diagnose hearing loss early in newborns. Adherence to the stages of screening, diagnosis, and rehabilitation within recommended timeframes is essential to ensure adequate development of auditory and language skills. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the diagnostic pathway of these children, considering the time of initiation and completion, the factors involved, and the audiological findings, as a basis to improve care pathways and ensure effectiveness of actions in pediatric hearing health. Objective: This study aims to investigate the electrophysiological diagnostic process in neonates who failed Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Method: A descriptive-exploratory study with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Medical records of infants up to 12 months old who attended audiological assessment following failure in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening or lack of screening were analyzed. Statistical analysis included Pearson correlations, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple linear regression models with a significance level of 5%. Results: The sample consisted of 24 children referred after failure in universal newborn hearing screening. The mean age at diagnosis initiation was 78 days, with 25% of children beginning the process at 90 days or older. Of the 24 children, 79.2% completed the diagnosis. Conclusion: The results emphasize the importance of coordination between screening and diagnosis, family support, and efficient organization of care pathways to ensure the full development of children with hearing loss.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. PAGNOSSIM, Débora Frizzo; KÜLKAMP, Naiara Moratelli; TEIXEIRA, Marluce Cristine. A triagem auditiva neonatal no processo de diagnóstico e reabilitação auditiva. Distúrbios da Comunicação, v. 32, n. 4, p. 549–561, 25 nov. 2020.

2. YOSHINAGA-ITANO, Christine. Fast Facts: Early Hearing Detection and Intervention. [S.l.]: S. Karger AG, 2023.

3. GALVÃO, Marcela Bastos; LEWIS, Doris Ruthy. Diagnóstico audiológico de lactentes após falha na triagem auditiva neonatal universal. Audiology - Communication Research, v. 28, p. e2657, 2023.

4. JOURNAL OF EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION. JCIH 2019. 2019.

5. World Report on Hearing. 1st ed ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.

6. BRITISH SOCIETY OF AUDIOLOGY (2025), Recommended Procedure Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Testing in Newborns. [Online]. British Society of Audiology, Available from: https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/OD100_Auditory-Brainstem-Response-ABR-Testing-in-Newborns-July-2025-.pdf. [25 de julho de 2025]

7. GALVÃO, Marcela Bastos; FICHINO, Silvia Nápole; LEWIS, Doris Ruthy. Processo do diagnóstico audiológico de bebês após a falha na triagem auditiva neonatal. Distúrbios da Comunicação, v. 33, n. 3, p. 416–427, 28 set. 2021.

8. HATTON, Jennifer L.; MAANEN, Anna Van; STAPELLS, David R. BRITISH COLUMBIA EARLY HEARING PROGRAM: AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE PROTOCOL. 2022.

9. Protocol for audiological surveillance of children at risk for Permanent hearing. 2019.

10. Jewett DL, Williston JS. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain. 1971; 94(4): 681-96. doi: 10.1093/brain/94.4.681. PMID: 5132966.

11. Hood LJ, Hood LJ. Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. San Diego: Singular Publ. Group; 1998. 285 p. (A Singular audiology textbook).

12. Lins OG, Picton TW. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. setembro de 1995; 96(5): 420–32.

13. John MS, Lins OG, Boucher BL, Picton TW. Multiple Auditory Steady-state Responses (MASTER): Stimulus and Recording Parameters. Int J Audiol. janeiro de 1998; 37(2): 59–82.

14. Tazinazzio TG, Diniz TA, Marba STM, Colella-Santos MF. Emissões otoacústicas e medidas de imitância acústica com tons de sonda de 226 e 1000 hz em lactentes. Rev CEFAC. 22 de dezembro de 2010;13(3): 479–88.

15. Northern JL. Hearing disorders. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1996.

16. Carvallo RMM, Sanches SGG. Medidas de Imitância Acústica. Em: Tratado de audiologia. Guanabara Koogan; 2015.

17. Jerger J. Clinical Experience With Impedance Audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1o de outubro de 1970; 92(4): 311–24.

18. Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Arehart KH, Burns EM. Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1o de novembro de 1993; 94(5): 2617–38.

19. Hunter LL, Tubaugh L, Jackson A, Propes S. Wideband Middle Ear Power Measurement in Infants and Children. j am acad audiol. 1o de abril de 2008; 19(4): 309–24

20. BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Guia para realização da Triagem Auditiva Neonatal (TAN) e seguimento assistencial. p. 64 p.-64 p., 2025.

21. Fisher, L. D. and van Belle, G. (1993). Biostatistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

22. OLIVEIRA, Thalita Da Silva; DUTRA, Monique Ramos Paschoal; CAVALCANTI, Hannalice Gottschalck. Triagem Auditiva Neonatal: associação entre a cobertura, oferta de fonoaudiólogos e equipamentos no Brasil. CoDAS, v. 33, n. 2, p. e20190259, 2021.

23. MALLMANN, Mariana B.; TOMASI, Yaná T.; BOING, Antonio Fernando. Neonatal screening tests in Brazil: prevalence rates and regional and socioeconomic inequalities. Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português), v. 96, n. 4, p. 487–494, jul. 2020.

24. ROSA, Barbara Cristina da Silva. Avaliação audiológica em crianças com microcefalia pela síndrome congênita do Zika vírus. 15 ago. 2019.

25. SININGER, Yvonne S. et al. Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss. Ear & Hearing, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1207–1223, nov. 2018.

26. DENG, Xidong et al. Receipt and Timeliness of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnostic Services Among Babies Born in 2017 in 9 States. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, v. 28, n. 1, p. E100–E108, jan. 2022.

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Santos, F. A. da S., & Lewis, D. R. (2026). Electrophysiological diagnostic process in neonates after failure in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS). Distúrbios Da Comunicação, 38(2), e74855. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2026v38i2e74855

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.