Aplicabilidad y consideraciones clínicas del sistema de enrutamiento de señal contralateral (CROS):
revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2022v34i1e51149Palabras clave:
Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral, Audición, Rehabilitación, AudífonosResumen
Introducción: El Sistema Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) es una opción de intervención auditiva con el propósito de mejorar la percepción monoaural y minimizar las dificultades de la pérdida auditiva unilateral. Objetivo: analizar y describir el público objetivo, el tiempo de adaptación, el control del uso del Sistema CROS, las evaluaciones utilizadas para medir sus beneficios, su efectividad y limitaciones. Metodo: Este estudio se realizó de acuerdo con las pautas PRISMA. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó a través de bases de datos científicas online del área de salud, PubMed y Scopus, utilizando las palabras clave “Unilateral hearing loss”, “Hearing aid”, “CROS” y “Contralateral Routing of Signal”. Los resultados de la investigación se limitaron a artículos científicos experimentales, que abordaron directamente el sistema CROS, publicados en inglés, portugués o español. Resultados: Se seleccionaron once artículos para revisión de texto completo. En cuanto a los usuarios de CROS, la edad osciló entre los nueve y los 84 años; prevalencia masculina. Hub gran diversidad en las evaluaciones, realizadas con tiempos de uso de menos de 30 días y más de seis meses tras la adaptación del CROS. Dicha evaluación se realizó mediante cuestionarios no estandarizados y evaluaciones objetivas con estímulos controlados. El uso de CROS proporcionó beneficios en la localización del sonido, el efecto de sombra de la cabeza y la inteligibilidad del habla, pero no fue efectivo en situaciones ruidosas. Conclusión: Al tratarse de un dispositivo no invasivo, de fácil adaptación y manejo que aporta beneficios inmediatos, CROS debería ser la primera opción en la rehabilitación de la hipoacusia unilateral.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Silman S, Iório MCM, Mizhahi MM, Parra VM. Próteses auditivas: um estudo sobre seu benefício na qualidade de vida de indivíduos portadores de perda auditiva neurossensorial. Distúrb. comun. 2004; 16(2): 153-65.
Zhang Y et al. Detection of Unilateral Hearing Loss by Stationary Wavelet Entropy. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2017; 16(2): 122-8. DOI: 10.2174/1871527315666161026115046.
Usami S et al. Etiology of single-sided deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 2017; 137(565): S2- 7. DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1300321.
Mondelli MFCG, Hoshii LA, Garcia TM, de Souza Jacob RT. Unilateral hearing loss: CROS fitting. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol., 2013; 79(4), 523. DOI: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130093.
Almeida K, Santos TMM. Seleção e adaptação de próteses auditivas em crianças. In: Almeida K, Iorio MCM. Próteses auditivas: fundamentos teóricos e aplicações clínicas. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Lovise; 2003. p.357-80.
Costa LD, Santos SN, Costa MJ. Perda auditiva unilateral e o uso de prótese auditiva: reconhecimento de fala, benefício, autopercepção do desempenho funcional e satisfação. Rev. CEFAC. 2019; 21(1), e13918. DOI: 10.1590/1982-0216/201921113918.
Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Holden LK, Dwyer NY, Cadieux JH. Results in individuals with asymmetric hearing loss using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. In: Semantic Scholar; 2015 [base de dados na internet]; [cited 2020 Set 15]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Results-in-Individuals-with-Asymmetric-Hearing-Loss-Firszt-h./f97f0e89f3eda1bdbf3c5e47 a0 9f778905e63453.
Lee DH, Noh H. Prediction of the use of conventional hearing aids in Korean adults with unilateral hearing impairment. Int. J. Audiol. 2015; 54(9): 6139. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1023902.
Krishnan LA, Hyfte SV. Management of unilateral hearing loss. Int. J. Pediatric. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 88: 63-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.048.
Mondelli MFCG, Santos MM, José MR. Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 82(4): 427-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.019.
Snapp HA, Hoffer ME, Liu X, Rajguru SM. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users. Otol Neurotol. 2017; 38(10): 1397-1404. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001614.
Tharpe A, Sladen D, Murphy JD, Boney S. Minimal Hearing Loss in Children: Minimal But Not Inconsequential. Semin Hear. 2009; 30: 80-93. DOI: 10.1055/S-0029-1215437.
Ryu N et al. Clinical effectiveness of wireless CROS (contralateral routing of offside signals) hearing aids. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272(9): 2213-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3133-0.
Gelfand SA. Usage of CROS hearing aids by unilaterally deaf patients. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979; 105(6): 328-332. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1979.00790180026005.
Snapp H. Nonsurgical Management of Single-Sided Deafness: Contralateral Routing of Signal. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019; 80(2): 132-138. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677687.
Kiessling J, Brenner B, Jespersen CT, Groth J, Jensen OD. Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16(04): 237–249. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.4.5.
BRASIL, 2012. Instrutivos de reabilitação auditiva, física, intelectual e visual. [cited 2020 Set 15]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009; 62: 1006-1012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Busk Linnebjerg L, Wetke R. The benefits of CROS aids for individuals with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Hear. Balance Commun. 2014; 12:1, 36-40. DOI: 10.3109/21695717.2013.794593.
Lundborg T, Swärd I, Lindström B. Experience with Classic Cros Hearing Aids in Unilateral Deafness. Scand Audiol. 1976; 5: 1,17-23. DOI: 10.3109/01050397609043091.
Navarro MR, Vogelson DO. An objective assessment of a CROS hearing aid. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974; 100(1): 58-59. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1974.00780040062012.
Tonning FM. Directional Audiometry: V. The Influence of Azimuth on the Perception of Speech in Patients with Monaural Hearing Loss treated with Hearing Aids (CROS), Acta Oto-Laryngol. 1972; 74: 1-6,37-44. DOI: 10.3109/00016487209128420.
Aufricht H. A follow-up study of the CROS hearing aid. J Speech Hear Disord. 1972; 37(1): 113-117. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.3701.113.
Lotterman SH, Kasten RN. Examination of the CROS type hearing aid. J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14(2): 416-420. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1402.416.
Harford E, Dodds E. The clinical application of CROS. A hearing aid for unilateral deafness. Arch Otolaryngol. 1966; 83(5): 455-464. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1966.00760020457010.
Harford E, Barry J. A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: the contralateral routing of signals CROS. J Speech Hear Disord. 1965; 30: 121-138. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.3002.121.
Park SN et al. Standardization for a Korean version of hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2011; 54: 828–834. DOI: 10.3342/KJORL-HNS.2011.54.12.828.
Chu H et al. Standardization for a Korean adaptation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids: study of validity and reliability. Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2012; 55:20–25. DOI: 10.3342/KJORL-HNS.2012.55.1.20.
Moon IJ et al. Sound localization performance improves after canaloplasty in unilateral congenital aural atresia patients. Otol Neurotol. 2014; 35: 639–644. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000271.
Moon SK et al. The Korean hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47: 375–376. DOI: 10.1080/14992020701882457.
Aiello CP, Lima II, Ferrari DV. Validity and reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.). 2011; 77, 4, 432-438. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000400005.
Mondelli MFCG, Jacob RTS, Ribeiro JP, Felici MGFM, Sanches RCP. Unilateral Hearing Loss: The Benefit of Auditory Localization after Adaptation of Hearing Aids Individual. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 14(3): 309-15.
Bevilacqua MC, Banhara MR, Da Costa EA, Vignoly AB, Alvarenga KF. The Brazilian Portuguese hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47(6): 364-5. DOI: 10.1080/14992020701870205.
Tonning FM. Directional audiometry. II The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech. Acta Otolaryng. 1971, 352. DOI: 10.3109/00016487109122493.
Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC Lists for Auditory Tests. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 1962; 27(1), 62. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62.
Dirks D, Carhart R. A survey of reactions from users of binaural and monaural hearing aids. J. Speech Hearing Dis.1962; 311-322. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.2704.311.
Finbow J, Bance M, Aiken S, Gulliver M, Verge J, Caissie R. A Comparison Between Wireless CROS and Bone-anchored Hearing Devices for Single-sided Deafness: A Pilot Study. Otol Neurotol. 2015; 36(5): 819-25. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000762.
Snapp H A, Hoffer M E, Liu X, Rajguru S M. Effectiveness in rehabilitation of current wireless CROS technology in experienced bone-anchored implant users. Otol Neurotol. 2017a; 38(10): 1397-1404. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001614.
Snapp H A, Holt F D, Liu X, Rajguru S M. Comparison of speech-in-noise and localization benefits in unilateral hearing loss subjects using contralateral routing of signal hearing aids or bone-anchored implants. Otol Neurotol. 2017b; 38(01): 11–18. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001269.
Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: The key influencing factors in hearing aid purchase intent. Hear Rev. 2012; 19(03): 12–25.
Williams VA, McArdle RA, Chisolm TH. Subjective and objective outcomes from new BiCROS technology in a veteran sample. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012; 23(10): 789–806. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.5.
Ericson H1 SI, Högset O, Devert G, Ekström L. Contralateral routing of signals in unilateral hearing impairment. A better method of fitting. Scand Audiol. 1988; 17: 111–6. DOI: 10.3109/01050398809070699.
Taal CH, van Barneveld DC, Soede W, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. Benefit of contralateral routing of signals for unilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 140(01): 393. DOI: 10.1121/1.4955307
Van de Heyning P, Távora-Vieira D, Mertens G, et al. Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper. Audiol Neurotol. 2016; 21(6): 391-398. DOI: 10.1159/000455058.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Vanessa de Oliveira Cristiano Nascimento, Letícia Bitencourt Uberti, Geise Corrêa Ferreira, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
