Contributions of a sequence of activities to the conceptual understanding of sampling and its implications for the teaching of statistics by in-service and pre-service teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2026.v28.e77455Keywords:
Sampling, Teacher education, Statistics education, Teacher knowledgeAbstract
Currently, the critical interpretation of statistical data is becoming increasingly necessary. Understanding sampling-related concepts is also relevant, given the prevalence of sample surveys in everyday life. To meet social demands and the requirements of the curricula, teacher education focused on statistical literacy plays a significant role, contributing to conceptual and pedagogical improvement. This article analyzes a sampling activity, part of a formative program conducted with in-service and pre-service teachers, within the context of a validated proposal developed in doctoral research. The objective of this work is to analyze, from a reflective perspective, the contributions of an activity involving erroneous beliefs about sampling to the development of content and pedagogical knowledge necessary for its teaching. Principles of design experiments support the methodological design of the study, whose data-collection instruments included participant protocols, a field diary, and audio recordings from the activity. We used content analysis following a directed approach, with predefined categories based on statistical literacy and knowledge mastery for teaching. The results revealed gaps in statistical and curriculum knowledge, and enabled the identification of erroneous beliefs about sampling, such as insensitivity to sample size and the composition fallacy. The observed strengths relate to contextual and mathematical knowledge, as well as critical questioning. Finally, when addressing issues aimed at improving the observed obstacles, pertinent discussions emerged that highlighted pedagogical knowledge.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, New York, 59(5), pp. 389-407. https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/handle/20.500.12365/17679
Barbosa, G. C., Lopes, C. E., & Santos, S. S. (2023). Mapeamento das teses e dissertações sobre a formação do professor de matemática: um olhar para a produção na educação estatística. Revista @mbienteeducação, 16(00), e023036. https://doi.org/10.26843/ae.v16i00.1172
Batanero, Carmen; Gea, Maria Magdalena; & Begué, Nuria. (2019) El sentido del muestro. Números - Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas. 100, pp. 121-124.
Begué, N., Batanero, C., Ruiz, K., & Gea, M. M. (2019). Understanding sampling: A summary of the research. Boletín de Estadística e Investigación Operative, BEIO, 35(1), 49-78. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carmen-Batanero/publication/337469892_Understanding_sampling_a_summary_of_the_research/links/5dd9496592851c1fedac9283/Understanding-sampling-a-summary-of-the-research.pdf
Ben-Zvi, D., Bakker, A., & Makar, K. (2015). Learning to reason from samples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 291-303. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-015-9593-3
Brasil. (2018). Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC). Educação é a Base. Brasília, MEC/CONSED/UNDIME. http://basenacionalcomum. mec. gov. br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf
Buehring, R. S. (2021). Movimentos de pensamento estatístico na infância: entre viver e contar histórias. [Tese de Doutorado em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/227356
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
Fernandes, D. F. (2024). Estado do conhecimento de produções científicas que versam sobre estatística nos livros didáticos. Revista Interação Interdisciplinar. pp. 243–263. https://doi.org/10.35685/revintera.v5i2.3681
Frei, F., Rosa, J. S., & Biazi, Â. H. (2023). Professores de Matemática estão preparados para o ensino de Estatística e Probabilidade?. Revista Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática, 13(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37001/ripem.v13i2.3378
Gal, I. (2002). Adults' statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International statistical review, 70(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x
Mateus, M. E. A. (2015). Um estudo sobre os conhecimentos necessários ao professor de Matemática para a exploração de noções concernentes às demonstrações e provas na Educação Básica. [Tese de Doutorado em Educação Matemática, Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo]. https://repositorio.pgsscogna.com.br//handle/123456789/3489
Perfil das crianças do Brasil. (n.d.). IBGE Educa. Acesso: 18 jan. 2024. https://educa.ibge.gov.br/jovens/materias-especiais/20786-perfil-das-criancas-brasileiras.html
Pesquisa Radar Pet 2020. (n.d.). Comac - Comissão Animais de Companhia. 2020. Acesso: 18 jan. 2024. https://comacvet.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/RADAR-PET-2020-APRESENTACAO-2.pdf
Rodrigues, M. U., & Silva, L. D. (2019). Disciplina de Estatística na matriz curricular dos cursos de Licenciatura em Matemática no Brasil. Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática, 14, 1-21.
Samá, S., & Silva, C. S. D. (2020). Estatística Vol. I – Rio Grande: Ed. da FURG.
Viali, L. (2008). O ensino de Estatística e Probabilidade nos cursos de Licenciatura em Matemática. In XVIII SINAPE (Simpósio Nacional de Probabilidade e Estatística).
Zeichner, K. M. (1993). A formação reflexiva de professores: ideias e práticas. Educa. https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstreams/0ffdc485-4163-4644-8750-20551a461f4a/download
Zeichner, K. M. (2003). Formando professores reflexivos para a educação centrada no aluno: possibilidades e contradições. Formação de educadores: desafios e perspectivas. São Paulo: UNESP, 35-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvânia da Silva Costa, Marta Élid Amorim, Luciana Neves Nunes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in EMP agree to the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.












