Emergência e personificação

como o Direito faz entidades não-humanas falarem

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2596-3333.v1n1.77363

Resumo

Apresentamos ao público brasileiro a tradução do artigo Emergence and personification: How the law makes non-human entities speak de autoria do professor e jurista Gunther Teubner da Goethe University Frankfurt.  

     

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Gunther Teubner, Goethe-Universität Frankfur

Professor Emérito da  Faculdade de  Direito da Goethe-Universität Frankfur.  Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Tübingen . Mestrado em Direito e Sociedade (Master of Arts) pela Universidade da Califórnia, Berkeley. Livre-docência (Habilitation) em Tübingen.  Foi professor de Direito Privado na Universidade de Bremen e do  Instituto Universitário Europeu em Florença, Itália. Titular da cátedra Otto Kahn Freund na London School of Economics - LSE , Centenary Visiting e na Universidade Goethe de Frankfurt.  Atuou como professor Jean Monnet no International University College de Turim  e  pesquisador principal do Cluster de Excelência "Normative Orders" (2007-2012). Foi professor visitante nas faculdades de direito de Berkeley, Ann Arbor, Stanford, Leiden, Toronto, Maastricht, Xangai, Pequim e Copenhague.

Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dos Santos, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUCSP

Professora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP), pós-doutora em Psicologia Clínica pela PUC-SP, doutora em Direito pela PUC-SP e doutora em Ciências da Religião pela PUC-SP. É livre-docente em Direito Penal pela USP e atua no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da PUC-SP, com produção relacionada à Filosofia do Direito, Bioética, Biodireito, inteligência artificial e interpretação da norma jurídica.

Marilene Araújo, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUCSP

Doutora em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade São Paulo (2020) . Mestre em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (2016). Tem experiência na área de Direito, com ênfase em Teoria Geral do Direito, Filosofia do Direito e Direito Constitucional, e administrativo, atuando na área de Direito de comunicação e direito administrativo. É uma das editoras da Revista Fronteiras Interdisciplinares do Direito e Coordenadora da REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE VITIMOLOGIA E JUSTIÇA RESTAURATIVA do Grupo de Pesquisa da Faculdade de Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP). Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa da Faculdade de Direito da Pontíficia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) Percepções Cognitivas da Interpretação da Norma e do Grupo Biós Biodireito/Bioética/Biopolitica. Membro do IBDC Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Constitucional. Vice-presidente do Instituto Pro-vítima https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-3184

Rodrigo de Araújo Alcantara Barbieri, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUCSP

Advogado. Doutorando em Direito na PUC-SP. Mestre em Filosofia de Direito pela Pontifica Universidade Católica de São Paulo   (2025) Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (2020). Especialista em Processo Civil pela PUC-SP (2023). Tem experiência na área de Direito, com ênfase em Direito Administrativo e Processual Civil. Tesoureiro no Instituto Provitima.

Referências

ABATE, R. S. 2019. Climate Change and the Voiceless: Protecting Future Generations, Wildlife, and Natural Resources. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

ALLEN, T. & WIDDISON, R. 1996. Can Computers Make Contracts? Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 9, 25-52.

ALTWICKER, T. 2015. Rechtsperson im Rechtspositivismus. In: GRÖSCHNER, R. (ed.) Person und Rechtsperson: Zur Ideengeschichte der Personalität. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

BAECKER, D. 2024a. Die Kunst der Konversation: Kann eine KI echte Gespräche führen? IM+io.

BAECKER, D. 2024b. In der Gesellschaft digitaler Medien. Theorising the Digital Society. Berlin: Humboldt Instituts für Internet und Gesellschaft.

BECKERS, A. & TEUBNER, G. 2021. Three Liability Regimes for Artificial Intelli-gence: Algorithmic Actants, Hybrids, Crowds, Oxford: Hart.

BECKERS, A. & TEUBNER, G. 2022. Mensch-Algorithmus-Hybride als Quasi-Organisationen? Zu Verantwortung und Verantwortlichkeit von digitalen Kollektivakteuren. Soziale Systeme, 25, 95-126.

BERTENTHAL, A. 2019. Standing Up for Trees: Rethinking Representation in a Multi-species Context. Law & Literature, 355-373.

BERTOLINI, A. & EPISCOPO, F. 2022. Robots and AI as Legal Subjects? Disentan-gling the Ontological and Functional Perspective. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 1-15.

BERTOLINI, A. & RICCABONI, M. 2020. Grounding the Case for a European Ap-proach to the Regulation of Automated Driving: The Technology-Selection Effect of Lia-bility Rules. European Journal of Law and Economics, 51, 243-284.

BICH, L. 2006. Autopoiesis and Emergence. In: MINATI, G., PESSA, E. & ABRAM, M. (eds.) Systemics of Emergence: Research and Development. Boston: Springer.

BJARUP, J. 2005. The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism. Ratio Juris, 18, 1-15.

BORA, A. 2019. Kommunikationsadressen als digitale Rechtssubjekte. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/kommunikations-adressen-als-digitale-rechtssubjekte/.

BORA, A., HUBER, M., MÖLDERS, M., MÜNTE, P. & PAUL, R. (eds.) 2017. Socie-ty, Regulation and Governance: New Modes of Shaping Social Change? Cheltenham: Elgar.

BOSTROM, N. 2017. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BOYLE, J. 2023. The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.

CARTWRIGHT, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CHALMERS, D. J. 2008. Strong and Weak Emergence. In: CLAYTON, P. & DAVIES, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DICKEL, S. 2023. Der kybernetische Blick und seine Grenzen: Zur systemtheoretischen Selbstbeschreibung der digitalen Gesellschaft. Berlin Journal für Soziologie 33, 197-226.

DURKHEIM, E. 1966. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

EASTERBROOK, F. H. & FISCHEL, D. 1989. The Corporate Contract. Columbia Law Review, 89, 1416-1448.

EFFER-UHE, D. 2021. Erklärungen autonomer Softwareagenten in der Rechtsgeschäftslehre. Recht Digital, 169-177.

ELDER-VASS, D. 2005. Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause. Journal of Criti-cal Realism, 4, 315-38.

ERDÉLYI, O. J. & ERDÉLYI, G. 2020. The AI Liability Puzzle and a Fund-Based Work-Around. AIES '20: Proceedings of the

AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 50-56.

ESPOSITO, E. 2017. Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Al-gorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46, 249-265.

ESPOSITO, E. 2022. Artificial Communication: How Algorithms Produce Social Intelli-gence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

ESPOSITO, E. 2024. Kommunikation mit unverständlichen Maschinen. Wien, Residenz.

EWALD, W. 1995. Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat. Amer-ican Journal of Comparative Law, 143, 1889-2149.

FEYERABEND, P. 2010. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.

FISCHER-LESCANO, A. 2020. Nature as a Legal Person: Proxy Constellations in Law. Law & Literature, 32, 237-262.

FLORIDI, L. & SANDERS, J.W. 2011. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. In: AN-DERSON, M. & ANDERSON, S.L. (eds) Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 184-212.

FLUME, W. 1983. Allgemeiner Teil des bürgerlichen Rechts: Die juristische Person. Berlin: Springer.

FUCHS, P. 2003. Der Eigen-Sinn des Bewußtseins: Die Person - die Psyche - die Signatur. Bielefeld: transcript.

GIERKE, O. 1936. Deutsches Privatrecht: Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

GILBERT, J. (2023). Creating Synergies between International Law and Rights of Na-ture. Transnational Environmental Law, 12, 671-692.

GOFFMAN, E. 1963. The Interaction Order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.

GRABER, C. B. 2021. How the Law Learns in the Digital Society. Law, Technology and Humans, 3, 12-27.

GRUBER, M.-C. 2015. Was spricht gegen Maschinenrechte? In: GRUBER, M.-C., BUNG, J. & ZIEMANN, S. (eds.) Autonome Automaten: Künstliche Körper und artifizielle Agenten in der technisierten Gesellschaft. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.

GRUBER, M.-C. 2024. The Anthropocenic Cupola: On Future Models of Climate Change Liability. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 44, 67-110.

GRÜNEBERG, C. 2022., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Kommentar. 81. ed. München: C.H. Beck.

GUNKEL, D. J. & WALES, J. J. 2021. What Is Personhood in the Age of AI? AI & SOCIETY, 36.

GUNNELL, M. 2023. Emergent Behavior. AI Dictionary,. Techopedia Artificial Intelli-gence.

GUREVICH, Y. 2012. What Is an Algorithm? Theory and Practice of Computer Science, 31-42.

GUTIÉRREZ, J. L. 2023. On Actor Network Theory and Algorithms: ChatGPT and the New Power Relationships in the Age of AI. AI and Ethics, 1-14.

GUTMANN, A. 2021. Hybride Rechtssubjektivität: Die Rechte der Natur oder „Pacha Mama“ in der ecuadorianischen Verfassung von 2008. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

HACKER, P. 2018. Verhaltens- und Wissenszurechnung beim Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz. Rechtswissenschaft, 243-288.

HACKER, P., KRESTEL, R., GRUNDMANN, S. & NAUMANN, F. 2020. Explaina-ble AI under Contract and Tort Law: Legal Incentives and Technical Challenges. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28, 415-439.

HARTH, J. & LORENZ, C.-F. 2017. ‚Hello World‘ - Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des Algorithmus. kommunikation@gesellschaft, 18, 1-21.

HEINTZ, B. 2004a. Emergence and Reduction. New Perspectives on the Micro-Macro-Link. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 56, 1-31.

HEINTZ, B. 2004b. Emergenz und Reduktion: Neue Perspektiven auf das Mikro-Makro-Problem. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 56, 1-31.

HILDEBRANDT, M. 2015. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law. Cheltenham: Elgar.

HORNER, S. & KAULARTZ, M. 2016. Haftung 4.0: Rechtliche Herausforderungen im Kontext der Industrie 4.0. Zeitschrift zum Innovations- und Technikrecht, 22-27.

HOYNINGEN-HUENE, P. & LOHSE, S. 2010. Emergence: Postulates and Candidates. PhilSciArchive https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5209/.

ISMAYILZADA, T. 2024. Technical Overview of AI and Its Participation in the Contract Formation: A Framework for AI-Made Mistakes in German and English Contract Law. Cham: Springer.

JENSEN, M. & MECKLING, W. H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 306-360.

KANT, I. 1870 [1785]. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Berlin, Heimann.

KANTOROWICZ, E. H. 1957. The King's Two Bodies. A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

KAUFFMAN, C. & MARTIN, P. 2018. Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US, Ecuador, and New Zealand. Global Environmental Politics, 18, 43-62.

KELSEN, H. 1978 [1934]. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.

KERSTEN, J. 2015. Menschen und Maschinen: Rechtliche Konturen instrumenteller, symbiotischer und autonomer Konstellationen. JuristenZeitung, 70, 1-8.

KERSTEN, J. 2017. Die Konsistenz des Menschlichen: Post- und transhumane Dimensionen des Autonomieverständnisses. In: BUMKE, C. & RÖTHEL, A. (eds.) Autonomie im Recht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

KERSTEN, J. 2017. Die Konsistenz des Menschlichen: Post- und transhumane Dimensionen des Autonomieverständnisses. In: BUMKE, C. & RÖTHEL, A. (eds.) Autonomie im Recht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

KERSTEN, J. 2019. KI-Kunst - Künstliche Intelligenz und künstlerische Freiheit. In: ISMER, R., REIMER, E., RUST, A. & WALDHOFF, C. (eds.) Territorialität und Personalität. Köln: Otto Schmidt.

KERSTEN, J. 2023. Ecological Constitutionalism: A Necessity. Rachel Carson Center Review, 4.

KIM, D. 2024. What Is Emerging in Artificial Intelligence Systems? Max Planck Law.

KIM, J. 1992. Downward Causation. In: BECKERMANN, A., FLOHR, H. & KIM, J. (eds.) Emergentism and Nonreductive Physicalism. Berlin: de Gruyter.

KIRSTE, S. 2015. Die beiden Seiten der Maske: Rechtstheorie und Rechtsethik der Rechtsperson. In: GRÖSCHNER, R.,

KIRSTE, S. & LEMBCKE, O. W. (eds.) Person und Rechtsperson: Zur Ideengeschichte der Personalität. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

KISCHEL, U. 2015. Rechtsvergleichung, München, Beck.

KLEINER, C. 2021. Die elektronische Person: Entwurf eines Zurechnungs- und Haftungssubjekts für den Einsatz autonomer Systeme im Rechtsverkehr. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

KLINGBEIL, S. 2017. Der Begriff der Rechtsperson. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 217, 848-885.

KONERTZ, R. & SCHÖNHOF, R. 2020. Das technische Phänomen „Künstliche Intelligenz“ im allgemeinen Zivilrecht: Eine kritische Betrachtung im Lichte von Autonomie, Determinismus und Vorhersehbarkeit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

KOLT, N. (2025). Governing AI Agents. Notre Dame Law Review. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4772956, 101, forthcoming.

KORNILAKIS, A. 2023. Legal Personhood for Autonomous AI: Practical Consequences in Private Law. In: KORNILAKIS, A., NOUSKALIS, G., PERGANTIS, V. & TZIMAS, T. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Normative Challenges: International and Comparative Legal Perspectives. Cham: Springer.

KUHN, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chi-cago Press.

KURKI, V. 2022. Can Nature Hold Rights? It’s Not as Easy as You Think. Transnational Environmental Law, 11, 525-552.

LATOUR, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

LATOUR, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.

LATOUR, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.

LEIMBACHER, J. 1988. The Rights of Nature. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.

LINARDATOS, D. 2021. Autonome und vernetzte Aktanten im Zivilrecht: Grundlinien zivilrechtlicher Zurechnung und Strukturmerkmale einer elektronischen Person Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

LOHSE, S. 2011. Zur Emergenz des Sozialen bei Niklas Luhmann. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 40, 190-207.

LORENTZEN, K. F. 2002. Luhmann Goes Latour: Zur Soziologie hybrider Beziehungen. In: RAMMERT, W. & SCHULZ-

SCHAEFFER, I. (eds.) Können Maschinen handeln? Soziologische Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik. Frankfurt: Campus.

LUHMANN, N. 1981. Interpenetration - Zum Verhältnis personaler und sozialer Systeme. In: LUHMANN, N. Soziologische Aufklärung 3. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

LUHMANN, N. 1987. Läßt unsere Gesellschaft Kommunikation mit Gott zu? In: LUHMANN, N. Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

LUHMANN, N. 1992. Wer kennt Wil Martens? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44, 139-142.

LUHMANN, N. 1993. "Was ist der Fall" und "Was steckt dahinter". Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 22, 245-260.

LUHMANN, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

LUHMANN, N. 2000a. Art as a Social System. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

LUHMANN, N. 2000b. Die Politik der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

LUHMANN, N. 2012. Theory of Society vol. 1, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

LUHMANN, N. 2013. Theory of Society vol. 2, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

LUHMANN, N. 2018. Organization and Decision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MAATZ, J. 2024. Deanthropozentrierte Rechtssubjektivität - Zur Expansion des menschlichen Körpers am Beispiel des deliktsrechtlichen Persönlichkeitsschutzes. Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum 16, 2024, 425-448.

MACPHERSON, E. 2023. Can Western Water Law Become More “Relational”? A Sur-vey of Comparative Laws Affecting Water across Australasia and the Americas’. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 53, 395–424.

MAY, J. & DALY, E. 2016. Global Environmental Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

MAYINGER, S. M. 2017. Die künstliche Person: Untersuchung rechtlicher Veränderungen durch die Installation von Softwareagenten im Rahmen von Industrie 4.0. Frankfurt: Fachmedien Recht und Wirtschaft.

MESSNER, C. 2020. Listening to Distant Voices. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de sémiotique juridique, 33, 1143-1173.

MORIN, E. 1986. La méthode 3: La connaissance, Paris, Seuil.

MUHLE, F. 2018. Sozialität von und mit Robotern? Drei soziologische Antworten und eine kommunikationstheoretische Alternative. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47, 147-163.

MÜHLEN, H. 1967. Una Mystica Persona: Die Kirche als das Mysterium der heilsgeschichtlichen Identität des Heiligen Geistes in Christus und den Christen. Eine Person in vielen Personen. Paderborn: Schöningh.

NASSEHI, A. 2019. Muster: Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. München: C.H. Beck.

NOVELLI, C. 2023. Legal Personhood for the Integration of AI Systems in the Social Context: A Study Hypothesis. AI & Society 38 (2023), S. 1347-1359.

NOVELLI, C., FLORIDI, L., SARTOR, G. & TEUBNER, G. 2025. AI as Legal Per-sons: Past, Patterns, and Prospects. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5032265).

O’CONNOR, T. 2021. Emergent Properties. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Ency-clopedia of Philosophy.

O’DONNELL, E. L. & TALBOT-JONES, J. 2018. Creating Legal Rights for Rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society, 23.

PANEZI, A. 2021. Liability Rules for AI-Facilitated Wrongs: An Ecosystem Approach to Manage Risk and Uncertainty. In:

GARCÍA MEXÍA, P. & PÉREZ BES, F. (eds.) AI and The Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.

PARSONS, T. 1951. The Social System: The Major Exposition of the Author's Concep-tual Scheme for the Analysis of the Dynamics of the Social System. New York: Free Press.

PEARL, T. H. 2019. Compensation at the Crossroads: Autonomous Vehicles & Alterna-tive Victim Compensation Schemes. William & Mary Law Review, 60, 1827-1891.

PIETRZYKOWSKI, T. 2014. Law, Personhood, and the Discontents of Juridical Hu-manism. ssrn.com.

ROBINSON, J.M.. 2021. Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Restoration Ecology: A Call to Listen Deeply, to Engage with, and Respect Indigenous Voices. Restoration Ecology, 29.

ROSSIPAUL, A. 2022. Künstliche Intelligenz in Kommunikation und Kunst: Eine verfassungsrechtliche Betrachtung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

SAMMUT, C. & WEBB, G. I. (eds.) 2017. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Boston, MA: Springer.

SAVIGNY, F. C. 1840. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Berlin: Veit.

SAWYER, K. 2005. Social Emergence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SCHICH, S. & KIM, B.-H. 2011. Guarantee Arrangements for Financial Promises: How Widely Should the Safety Net be Cast? OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2011, 201-235.

SCHIRMER, J.-E. 2016. Rechtsfähige Roboter. Juristenzeitung, 660-666.

SHEFFI, N. 2024. We Accept: Bit-by-bit Constitution. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 44, 174-212.

SIMMEL, G. 2009. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Boston: Brill.

SPINDLER, G. & SCHUSTER, F. 2019. Recht der elektronischen Medien. Kommentar. 4. ed. München: C.H. Beck.

SPRENGER, G. 2017. Communicated into Being: Systems Theory and the Shifting of Ontological Status. Anthropological Theory, 17, 108-132.

STAR, S. L. 1989. The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Het-erogenous Distributed Problem Solving. In: GASSER, L. & HUHNS, M. N. (eds.) Dis-tributed Artificial Intelligence II. London: Pitman.

STEPHAN, A. 2011. Emergenz in sozialen Systemen. In: GREVE, J. & SCHNABEL, A. (eds.) Emergenz. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

STUCKI, S. 2020. Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights. Oxford: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40, 533-560.

TEUBNER, G. 1988. Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the 'Essence' of the Legal Person. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 36, 130-155.

TEUBNER, G. 1993. The Many-Headed Hydra: Networks as Higher-Order Collective Actors. In MCCAHERY, J.,

PICCIOTTO, S. & SCOTT, C. (eds.) Corporate Control and Accountability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

VARELA, F. & DUPUY, J.-P. 1992. Understanding Origins. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

VARELA, F. J. 1979. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier.

VESTING, T. 2023. Subjectivity Transformed: The Cultural Foundation of Liberty in Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

VLADECK, D. C. 2014. Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial In-telligence. Washington Law Review, 89, 117-150.

WAGNER, G. & LUYKEN, L. 2020. Haftung für Robo Advice. In: BACHMANN, G., GRUNDMANN, S., MENGEL, A. &

KROLOP, K. (eds.) Festschrift für Christine Windbichler. Berlin: de Gruyter.

WAGNER, G. 2019a. Robot Liability. In: SCHULZE, R., LOHSSE, S. & STAUDENMAYER, D. (eds.) Liability for Robotics and in the Internet of Things. Ba-den-Baden/Oxford: Nomos/Hart.

WAGNER, G. 2019b. Robot, Inc.: Personhood for Autonomous Systems? Fordham Law Review, 88, 591-612.

WEBER, M. 1968 [1914-1920]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Soci-ology. New York: Bedminster.

WEGENER, B. 2019. Urgenda - Weltrettung per Gerichtsbeschluss? Klimaklagen testen die Grenzen des Rechtsschutzes. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, 3-13.

WEYER, J. & FINK, R. 2011. Die Interaktion von Mensch und autonomer Technik in soziologischer Perspektive. Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 20, 39-45.

WHITEHEAD, A. N. 1997 [1925]. Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press.

WILDMAN, W. J. & SHULTS, F. L. 2018. Emergence: What Does it Mean and How is it Relevant to Computer Engineering? In: MITTAL, S., DIALLO, S. & TOLK, A. (eds.) Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems Engineering. London: Wiley.

WOODWARD, P. 2018. Explaining the Ontological Emergence of Consciousness. In: GUTA, M. P. (ed.) Consciousness and the Ontology of Properties. New York: Routledge.

ZECH, H. 2019. Künstliche Intelligenz und Haftungsfragen. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft, 198-219.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-08-11

Como Citar

Teubner, G., Santos, M. C. C. L. dos, Araújo, M., & Barbieri, R. de A. A. (2026). Emergência e personificação: como o Direito faz entidades não-humanas falarem. Revista Fronteiras Interdisciplinares Do Direito, 1(1), 04–56. https://doi.org/10.23925/2596-3333.v1n1.77363

Edição

v. 1 n. 1 (2026): Fronteiras Interdisciplinares do Direito

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2026 Gunther Teubner

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.