USE OF THE LABORATORY OF MANAGEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE REVISED BLOOM'S TAXONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2019v34i2p81-91Keywords:
learning, laboratory management, learning in education.Abstract
This study illustrates how the activities of the laboratory of management can contribute to generate interest and improve the process of student learning. The article analyzes the activities generated in the laboratory of management with the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Potential effects and benefits of the teaching and learning of these activities associated with the revised Bloom's taxonomy will be discussed. Therefore, the objective of this study is to report the whole process of learning during the classes of laboratory management (SIMULAB). The primary data were collected from companies that participated in the laboratory of management through the completion of forms of decision-making and results obtained in the SIMULAB. In addition to the collection of data, was conducted interviews with students of participating companies. The study showed that during the development of activities in the SIMULAB led the students to create innovative projects to compete among themselves as a result. Furthermore, it was observed that the students participated actively in the process of development of activities.
References
Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(3), 152–153.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. DAVID McKAY COMPANY, INC. London.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativos, quantitativo e misto (2nd ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Dochy, F., de Rijdt, C., & Dyck, W. (2002). Cognitive Prerequisites and Learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 265–284.
Illeris, K. (2018a). A comprehensive understanding of human learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning _ learning theorists in their own words (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Illeris, K. (2018b). Contemporary theories of learning _ learning theorists in their own words. (K. Illeris, Ed.) (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Moreira, M. A. (1999). A teoria da aprendizagem significante de Rogers. In Teorias de Aprendizagem. São Paulo: EPU.
Richardson, R. J. (2012). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Sauaia, A. C. A. (2010). Laboratório de gestão: simulador organizacional, jogo de empresas e pesquisa aplicada. Barueri: Manole.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os autores concedem à revista todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os conceitos emitidos em artigos assinados são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
