Comentários do leitor

NRI Legal Services Toronto - How to deal with property related legalities in sale of property without coming to India by SimranLaw - The smart Trick of NRI Legal Services That No One is Discussing

"Roxanne Krieger" (2018-12-06)

Union, [1965] INSC 154; [1966] 1 S. A party is entitled to know why the decision has gone against him. That is why in such circumstances, what is known as a 'speaking order' is called for. [309C-F] 3 03 A 'speaking order' is all the more necessary in the case of a decision under r. We therefore recommend in our submission of 12 nrillegalservices August increasing the DHP pot by £20m in 2013/14 and 2014/15. The government initially decided that, rather than creating general exceptions for persons with disabilities (or certain categories of persons with disabilities), their needs should be met NRI Lawyers as necessary through a scheme of discretionary housing payments NRI Legal services based on individual assessments.

NRI-LEGAL-SERVICES.pngTo the same effect is the judgment of the Kerala High Court in Joseph v. A correct appreciation of the scope and the NRI Legal place of funda- mental rights in our Constitution will give its the right perspective for solving the problem presented before us, Its scope cannot be appreciated unless we have a conspectus of the Constitution, its objects. I have perused the judgment of my learned Brother Wanchoo, J. and I agree with his conclusion that the Constitution NRI Legal services (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964 is legally valid, but in view of the importance.

State of Andhra (2 and Annamalai v. "trying to define ‘significantly adapted accommodation’ for exemption purposes would not be workable. The same difficulty would arise where the State Government gives a number of reasons some of which are good and some are not and the Central Government gives its decision without specifying those reasons which according to it are sufficient to uphold the order of the State Government.

" Refrence may also be made NRI Lawyers to Ramayya v. But when the reasons given in the order of the State Government are scrappy or nebulous and the Central Government makes no attempt to clarify the same, this Court, in appeal may have to examine the case de novo, without anybody being the wiser for the -review by the Central Government. 309B-C] If the State Government gives sufficient reasons for accepting the application of one party and rejecting that of others, as it must, and the Central Government adopts the -reasoning of the State Government, this Court may proceed to examine whether the reasons given are sufficient for the purpose NRI Legal of nrillegalservices upholding the decision.

Shyam Sundar Jhunihunwala, [1961] INSC 185; [1962] 2 S. The Union of India, [1960] INSC 7; [1960] 2 S. In summary, as part of its policy for curbing public expenditure the government aimed to ensure that social sector tenants of working age who were occupying premises with more bedrooms than they required should, wherever possible, move into smaller accommodation. [315H] Shivji Nathubhai v. It was recognised at an early stage that a policy based purely on numbers of rooms and occupants would cause problems for some with disabilities, and there was a debate within government and Parliament about how such problems should be addressed.

Such an exemption would be difficult and expensive to deliver effectively, especially within universal credit. It would either be too broad brush or leave out many other, equally deserving cases. The objective sought- to be achieved by the Constitution is declared in sonorous terms. in its preamble which reads "We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign, Democratic, Republic and to secure to all its citizens justice.

and its machinery to achieve those object. of the constitutional issues raised in this case I would prefer to state, my own reasons in a separate judgment. 55 because there is provision for new material being placed before the Central Government which was not there before the State Government, and further, because the decision, affecting important rights of parties, is given in a summary manner without a hearing being allowed to the parties.

From the standpoint of fair name of the tribunals and also in the interests of the public, they should be, expected to give reasons when they set aside an order of an inferior tribunal. Further, if reasons for an order are given, there will be less scope for arbitrary or partial exercise of powers and the order 'ex facie' will indicate whether extraneous circumstances were taken into consideration by the tribunal in passing the order. The evolution of Reg B13 is described in detail in the judgments given in the case of MA and others by the Divisional Court (paras 20 to 33) and the Court of Appeal (paras 15 to 36).

This approach would enable local authorities to make decisions at a local level about which cases should be prioritised for financial help to meet any shortfall caused by this measure. 55 of any provision for giving such reasons is not decisive of the matter in view of the above considerations. 466, Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Paragraphs 20 to 33 of the judgment of Laws LJ in the Divisional Court are reproduced at appendix 2 to this judgment.

339 and Sardar Govindraov. [320G-321B] The absence in r.