Comentários do leitor

NRI Legal Services Birmingham - Why to deal with property concerning legalities in purchase of property without coming to India by Simranjeet Law Associates - How Much You Need To Expect You'll Pay For A Good NRI Legal Services

"Roxanne Krieger" (2018-12-09)

But Article 39(d) read with Articles 14 and 16 of the Con- stitution declares the constitutional goal enjoining the State not NRI Legal to deny any person equality before law in matters relating to employment including the scales of pay. This is not a matter merely of some dispensable procedural 'form' but the requirement of substance. But it is NRI Lawyers not disputed that the gift also is nothing more than an oral gift and the same is about adoption. It might have to pay individuals before it could utter that word, but with it remains the final power .

HOs9SZc.pngThe Additional Munsiff, Hubli who tried the suit pass ed a preliminary decree for partition of l/3rd share of Gura p- pa's properties in the hands of the defendants 2 to 4 by metes and bounds. If it has a rational nexus with the object to be sought for, as reiterat- ed before a certain amount of value judgment of the administrative authorities who are charged with fixing the pay scale has to be left with them and it cannot be interfered with nrillegalservices by the court NRI Legal services unless it is demonstrated that either it is irrational or based on no basis or arrived mala fide either in law or infact.

As regards the two events i. of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' is applicable when employees holding the same rank perform similar functions and discharge similar duties and responsibilities are treated differently. The doctrine of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' is not abstract one, it is open to the State to prescribe different scales of pay for different posts having regard to educational qualifications, duties and responsibilities of the post. The respondent is a regi s- tered partnership firm doing business in metallic yarn a nd other allied products at Salem.

The principle of "Equal Pay for Equal Work" has been enforced by this Court in Randhir Singh v. (b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant, be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector (c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer-employee relations. placed in the situation in which the appellant was placed. 104-105 para 11) "The same amount of physical work may entail different 435 quality less--it varies from nature and cul- ture of employment.

It has the last word as to whether its mountains shall be stripped of their forests and its inhabitants shall breathe pure air. [120G] Judicial proceedings of this Court are not subject to writ jurisdiction thereof. The High Court has expressed its view in the following terms: In the second appeal preferred to the High Court, the appellant's counsel contended that the Trial Court ought to have treated the appellant's application under Section 13(3) and 13(4) as one under Section 13-A and given the benefit of the Section to the appellant and dismissed the suit for eviction.

, [1982] INSC 24; [1982] 1 SCC 618; Article 39(d) read with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution enjoins the State that where all things are equal and person holding indentical posts, performing indentical and similar duties under the same employer should not be treated differ- ently in the matter of their pay. 2 If the decision suffers from an error, the only way to correct it, is to go in Review under Article 137 read with order 40 Rule 1 framed under Article 145 before "as far as is practicable" the same judges.

In that capacity the State has an interest independent of and behind the titles of its citizens, in all the earth and air within its domain. The problem about equal pay cannot always be translated into a mathe- matical formula. State of Maharashtra & Anr. The application of doctrine would arise where employees are equal in every respect but they are denied equality in matters relating to the scale of pay. The second appellant is a sister concern of the fir st appellant doing business with it.

<a href=nrillegalservices" style="max-width:430px;float:right;padding:10px 0px 10px 10px;border:0px;">[109A] In the instant case, the remedy of the appellant is recourse to Article 137, no where else. [118H] Naresh Sridhar Mirajkar & Ors. The High Court, in spite of accepting the position that though the suit was pending when the Amending Ordinance was promul- gated, the appellant could not have filed a petition under Section 13A within thirty days from the date of the Ordi- nance coming into force as the suit summons came to be served on him only later, nevertheless declined to interfere because in its view the Act has not provided for any relief to tenants.

4 The first appellant is a manufacturer and supplier of metallic yarn under the name and style 'Rupalon Metall ic Yarn' having its registered office at Udyognagar, Mohamad a- bad, Gujarat within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court of Kaira. This is both in good sense and good law. 4 was lawfully married wife of Gurappa. adoption and gift there is some controversy in respect of the respective dates. "This is a suit by a State for an injury to it in its capacity of quasi-sovereign.

Defendants 2 to 4 contested that Defenda nt No. The High Court has further held that the Act contains a lacuna but it can NRI Legal be remedied only by the Legis- lature and not by the Courts and, as such, the appellant cannot claim the benefit of Section 13A of the NRI Legal services Act. Even so, the Trial Court passed a decree for eviction against the appellant on the ground of default in payment of rent and the Appellate Court confirmed the decree.

It appears and it was contended by the counsel for the appel- lants that adoption was first and gift was only a consequen- tial act to accelerate the succession whereas learned coun- sel for the respondents contended that gift was first where- as adoption was subsequent. , [1966] 3 SCC 744 followed. "Provided further that if any person appointed to the Section officers' Grade is considered for promotion to Grade I under this sub-rule, all persons senior to him in Section officers' Grade, belonging to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes who have rendered not less than 4 years' approved service in that grade, shall also be considered for promotion.