Do fardo do homem branco à “tirania da culpa” colonial

discursos de desresponsabilização histórica e alívio de consciência por Nigel Biggar

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2767.2026v86p274-300

Mots-clés :

História da Escravidão, Colonialismo, Racismo, Análise do Discurso, Reparações

Résumé

Este artigo examina como Reparations (2025a) de Nigel Biggar recodifica a responsabilidade histórica como culpa imaginária e tirania, desonerando um “nós” anglosférico e deslegitimando reparações. A pesquisa se ancora na Análise Crítica do Discurso (dialético-relacional) e aplica o modelo tridimensional de Fairclough para analisar léxico avaliativo, metáforas, modalização, pressuposições e agência. Resultados indicam a medicalização da culpa coletiva e a instalação de uma política da prova que redefine o que faz sentido, desloca a injustiça histórica para requisitos de causalidade e cálculo, e reenquadra a centralidade branca como vulnerabilidade moral.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Métriques

Chargements des métriques ...

Bibliographies de l'auteur

Gilberto Alves Araújo, University of the Witwatersrand, UNIFA & Universidade Federal do Pará

Pesquisador Associado no Department of Media Studies University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), South Africa – with an exchange period at the University of Mannheim, Germany –, where he has been carrying out a Critical Discourse Analysis research project regarding the representations on migrants in South African and Brazilian newspapers; Assistant Professor & Researcher at the Departamento de Língua Inglesa, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Brazil, where he has worked on several French Discourse Analysis research initiatives relating to teachers’ and students’ discourses on English language, its learning and teaching processes.

Gizélia Maria da Silva Freitas, Universidade Federal do Pará

Mestre em Letras, com ênfase em Linguística, pela Universidade Federal do Pará, e graduada em Letras Português-Inglês pela mesma instituição. Atualmente é coordenadora do PIBID na UFPA/Altamira, e coordenadora do Laboratório de Linguagem do Campus de Altamira (UFPA).

Eliene Rodrigues Sousa, Universidade Estadual do Tocantins

Doutora em Ensino de Língua e Literatura pela Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) e mestre na mesma área pela mesma instituição. Graduou-se em Letras–Português e Inglês na UFT. Atua como professora de Língua Portuguesa na Secretaria de Educação e Cultura do Tocantins (SEDUC-TO) e realiza estágio pós-doutoral no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade Federal do Norte do Tocantins (UFNT).

Références

ALMEIDA, S. L. de. Racismo estrutural. São Paulo: Jandaíra, 2019.

ANDREWS, K. The new age of empire: how racism and colonialism still rule the world. Nova Iorque: Penguin, 2022.

ARAUJO, A. L. Reparations for slavery and the slave trade: a transnational and comparative history. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2017.

ARMANGE, R.; MULLET, E. Slave descendants’ views regarding national policies on reparations: a Martinican perspective. Social Science Information, v. 55, n. 4, 2016, pp. 511-530.

BANNER, M. Britain’s slavery debt: reparations Now! Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. pp. 15-16.

BARKAN, E. The guilt of nations: restitution and negotiating historical injustices. Nova Iorque: Norton & Co., 2000.

BECKLES, H. McD. “Slavery was a long, long time ago”: Remembrance, Reconciliation and the Reparations Discourse in the Caribbean. Ariel, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 9-26, 2007.

BECKLES, H. McD. Britain’s black debt: reparations for Caribbean slavery and native genocide. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press, 2013.

BIGGAR, N. Reparations: slavery and the tyranny of imaginary guilt. London: Swift Press, 2025a.

BIGGAR, N. Residential schools were no ‘atrocity’. Just look at the evidence. National Post, 2 abr. 2025b. Disponível em: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/nigel-biggar-residential-schools-were-no-atrocity-just-look-at-the-evidence. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2025.

BRANSCOMBE, N. R.; DOOSJE, B. (org.). Collective guilt: international perspectives. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.

BROOKS, R. L. Atonement and forgiveness: a new model for Black reparations. Los Angeles: UCP, 2004.

CORLETT, J. A. Heirs of oppression: racism and reparations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.

CUMMING, E. Nigel Biggar: Being cancelled has worked out fantastically for me. The Telegraph, 14 set. 2025.

DIANGELO, R. White fragility: why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Nova Iorque: Penguin, 2018.

DORITY JR., W. A.; MULLEN, A. K. From here to equality: reparations for Black Americans in the 21st century. Chapel Hill: UNC, 2020.

DYER, R. White: essays on race and culture. 20th anniversary ed. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, 2017.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Londres: Routledge, 2003.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. 2. ed. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2010.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

FRITH, N. Crime and penitence in slavery commemoration: from political controversy to the politics of performance. In: BARCLAY, F. (org.). France’s colonial legacies: memory, identity and narrative. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2013. pp. 227-248.

GILROY, P. The Black Atlantic: modernity and double consciousness. Nova Iorque: Verso, 1993.

HARB, A. Abduction of Venezuela’s Maduro illegal despite US charges, experts say. Al Jazeera, 8 jan. 2026.

HOOPS, J. F. A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis of Reparations Inertia. Discourse & Communication, v. 18, n. 5, 2024, pp. 741-767.

JANSSEN, C. Addressing corporate ties to slavery: corporate apologia in a discourse of reconciliation. Faculty Research and Creative Activity, n. 33, 2012, pp. 1-21.

JORDAN, W. D. The White Man’s Burden: historical origins of racism in the United States. New York: OUP, 1974.

KEDOURIE, E. In the Anglo-Arab Labyrinth: The McMahon-Husayn Correspondence and Its Interpretations, 1914-1939. 2 ed. London: Frank Cass, 2000 [1976]. p. 220.

LEKAS, P. Review – E. Sylvia Kedourie (ed.), Elie Kedourie’s Approaches to History and Political Theory: “The Thoughts and Actions of Living Men”. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, v. 3, 2006, pp. 227-238.

MBEMBE, A. Critique of black reason. Trad. Laurent Dubois. Durham: DUP, 2017.

MIGUEL, L. F. A cruzada contra o capital cultural. Mediações, v. 27, n. 3, 2022, pp. 1-19.

MILLS, C. W. The racial contract. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1997.

PROSS, C. Paying for the past: the struggle over reparations for surviving victims of the Nazi terror. Trad. Belinda Cooper. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1998.

REICHELMANN, A. V.; HUNT, M. O. White Americans’ Attitudes Toward Reparations for Slavery: Definitions and Determinants. Race and Social Problems, v. 14, 2022, pp. 269-281.

SAID, E. W. Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books, 2012.

SAID, E. W. Orientalism. 25th anniversary ed. London: Penguin Books, 2003.

SMITS, E. The shifting discourse on the Dutch slavery past: an analysis on the discourses and frames surrounding the debate on the apology for the Dutch slavery past by the Dutch government. 2023. 125 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Human Geography) – Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, 2023.

STEELE, S. White guilt: how Blacks and Whites together destroyed the promise of the Civil Rights era. New York: Harper Perennial, 2006.

TAIWO, O. O. Reconsidering reparations: worldmaking in the case of climate crisis. New York: OUP, 2022.

THOMPSON, J. Taking responsibility for the past: reparation and historical injustice. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.

TORPEY, J. C. Making whole what has been smashed: on reparations politics. Cambridge: HUP, 2006.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2026-07-27

Comment citer

Araújo, G. A., Freitas, G. M. da S., & Sousa, E. R. (2026). Do fardo do homem branco à “tirania da culpa” colonial: discursos de desresponsabilização histórica e alívio de consciência por Nigel Biggar. Projeto História : Revista Do Programa De Estudos Pós-Graduados De História, 86, 274–300. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2767.2026v86p274-300