Industrial SME performance under saudi vision 2030

the role of institutional support, digital transformation, and innovation capability

Autores/as

  • Faiz Alfazzi Yanbu Industrial College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2026v17i2e76637

Palabras clave:

Digital Transformation, Industrial SMEs, Innovation capability, Institutional Support, Saudi Arabia, SME performance

Resumen

Industrial small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a critical role in industrial diversification, innovation development, employment generation, and sustainable economic growth. Within the context of Saudi Vision 2030, industrial SMEs have gained increasing strategic importance due to ongoing economic reforms, entrepreneurship initiatives, digital transformation programs, and industrial development policies. Despite these efforts, limited empirical evidence explains how institutional environments and technological transformation jointly influence industrial SME performance through internal organizational capabilities. Drawing upon Institutional Theory, the Resource-Based View (RBV), and Dynamic Capabilities, this study develops and empirically tests an integrated framework explaining the relationships among institutional support, digital transformation, innovation capability, and industrial SME performance. A quantitative cross-sectional research design was employed using survey data collected from 350 industrial SMEs operating in Saudi Arabia. The proposed model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine direct and indirect relationships. The findings reveal that institutional support and digital transformation exert significant positive direct effects on industrial SME performance while also generating indirect effects through innovation capability. Innovation capability emerged as the principal mediating mechanism explaining how external support systems and technological investments are transformed into organizational performance outcomes. The mediation findings further confirm the complementary roles of Institutional Theory, RBV, and Dynamic Capabilities in explaining industrial SME performance within transformation economies such as Saudi Arabia. This study contributes theoretically by integrating multiple perspectives into a unified explanatory framework and empirically extending the literature on SME performance, innovation, and digital transformation. Contextually, the study provides evidence from Saudi Arabia as an emerging economy experiencing large-scale industrial and structural transformation under Vision 2030. The findings offer important implications for policymakers, industrial stakeholders, and SME managers seeking to enhance innovation capability, digital readiness, industrial competitiveness, and sustainable growth.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Faiz Alfazzi, Yanbu Industrial College

Management Science Department

Royal Commission for Yanbu, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia

Citas

Autio, E., Mudambi, R., & Yoo, Y. (2021). Digitalization and globalization in a turbulent world. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(7), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-6

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009

Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does firm size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x

General Authority for Small and Medium Enterprises (Monsha’at). (2024). SME Monitor Report 2024. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Guo, H., Yang, Z., Huang, R., & Guo, A. (2020). The digital transformation of SMEs: A new knowledge creation and appropriation approach. Journal of Business Research, 116, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.018

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Saudi Vision 2030. Government of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2020). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 30(6), 1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12238

Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00255.x

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). SME and Entrepreneurship Policy in Saudi Arabia. OECD Publishing.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Saudi Industrial Development Fund (SIDF). (2023). Annual Report 2023. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

World Bank. (2020). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Finance. World Bank Group.

bility and measurement quality.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-09-03

Número

Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2026): Journal on Innovation and Sustainability

Sección

Papers

Licencia

This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.

1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;

2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);

3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);

4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.