Bricolagem de recursos empreendedores e inovação social
efeito moderador do alerta empresarial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2022v13i2p92-110Palavras-chave:
Bricolagem de Recursos Empreendedores, Inovações Sociais, Empreendedorismo, Prontidão Empreendedora, Organizações de Propósito SocialResumo
O conceito de bricolagem de recursos empresariais evoluiu com os estudos científicos e se espalhou para as ciências sociais recentemente. Focando principalmente no contexto da organização de propósito social, a bricolagem de recursos empresariais é uma área de pesquisa que pode levar a solução de problemas sociais por meio de inovações socialmente conscientes. Assim, este estudo investiga como a bricolagem de recursos empresariais leva a inovações sociais nutritivas e como o empreendedor pode moderar todo o processo. A partir de uma amostra de 264 empreendedores sociais, o estudo seguiu uma abordagem quantitativa para investigar a questão principal da pesquisa. Os resultados revelam que a bricolagem de recursos empreendedores influência significativamente na promoção de inovações sociais, enquanto o empreendedor modera o processo. O estudo também descobriu que há um nível mais alto de SI no Sri Lanka e que o nivel de uso dos empreendedores sociais ERB do Sri Lanka está em um nível mais alto. Juntamente com os resultados, este estudo fornece insights teóricos e gerenciais significativos.
Referências
Acs, Z. J., & Sany, J. (2009). Measuring the Social Value of Innovation: The Cases of Muhammad Yunus, Grameen Bank and Bill Gates, Microsoft. Measuring the Social Value of Innovation: A Link in the University Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship Equation, 19, 143. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-4736(2009)19
Adams, D., & Hess, M. (2010). SI and Why it has Policy Significance. https://doi.org/10.1177/103530461002100209
Adomako, S., Danso, A., Boso, N., & Narteh, B. (2018). Entrepreneurial alertness and new venture performance: Facilitating roles of networking capability. International Small Business Journal, 36(5), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617747667
Antadze, N., & Westley, F. R. (2012). Impact Metrics for Social Innovation: Barriers or Bridges to Radical Change? Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726005
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research policy, 32(2), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9
Best, B., Miller, K., Mcadam, R., & Moffett, S. (2021). Mission or Margin? Using Dynamic Capabilities to Manage Tensions in Social Purpose Organizations’ Business Model Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 125, 643-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.068
Burgers, H., Stuetzer, M., & Senyard, J. M. (2014). Antecedents, Consequences, and the Mediating Role of Bricolage in Corporate Entrepreneurship. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 13473). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.13473abstract
Cajaiba-Santana, G., 2014. Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, pp.42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
Chalmers, D. (2013). Social Innovation: An Exploration of the Barriers Faced By Innovating Organizations in the Social Economy. Local Economy, 28(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094212463677
Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2017). A Measure of Entrepreneurial Bricolage Behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256
Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding Social Innovation: A Provisional Framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
Dwivedi, A. And Weerawardena, J., 2018. Conceptualizing and Operationalizing the Social Entrepreneurship Construct. Journal of Business research, 86, pp.32-40. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.053
Gaglio, C. M. And Katz, J. A. (2001) ‘The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics’, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1225(February), pp. 41–42.
Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. Industrial and corporate change, 5(3), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.3.883
Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A., & Rahman, S. A. (2016). The Functional Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Entrepreneurial Bricolage in Ensuring Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Management research review. . https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2015-0144
Hölsgens, R., Lübke, S., & Hasselkuß, M. (2018). Social Innovations in the German Energy Transition: An Attempt to Use the Heuristics of the Multi-Level Perspective of Transitions to Analyze the Diffusion Process of Social Innovations. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0150-7
Jayawardhana, K. And Weerawardena, J., 2014. Conceptualizing the Role of Market Learning in Social Innovation-Based Competitive Strategy.
Jayawardhana, K., 2020. Open Innovation Orientation an Sustainability of SMES: Do Entrepreneurial Orientation And Resource Bricolage Matter? Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 11(4), p.127-146. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2020v11i4p127-146
Jiao, H., Cui, Y., Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2014). Building Entrepreneurs’ Innovativeness through Knowledge Management: The Mediating Effect of Entrepreneurial Alertness. Technology analysis & strategic management, 26(5), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.872774
Kannampuzha, M. J., & Suoranta, M. (2016). Bricolage in the Marketing Efforts of a Social Enterprise. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-07-2015-0039
Kariv, D., & Coleman, S. (2015). Toward A Theory of Financial Bricolage: The Impact of Small Loans on New Businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. . https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2013-0020
Kincheloe, J. L. (2011). Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research. In Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 177-189). Brill Sense.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2011). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. In Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 253-277). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056
Kluvánková, T., Brnkaľáková, S., Špaček, M., Slee, B., Nijnik, M., Valero, D., & Gežík, V. (2018). Understanding SI for the well-being of forest-dependent communities: A preliminary theoretical framework. Forest Policy and Economics, 97(C), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.016
Krlev, G., Bund, E., & Mildenberger, G. (2014). Measuring what matters—Indicators of social innovativeness on the national level. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 200-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
Langevang, T. And Namatovu, R., 2019. Social bricolage in the aftermath of war. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 31(9-10), pp.785-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1595743
Lopes, D. P. T., dos Santos Vieira, N., Barbosa, A. C. Q., & Parente, C. (2017). Management innovation and SI: convergences and divergences. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración.
Martinez, F., O’Sullivan, P., Smith, M., & Esposito, M. (2017). Perspectives on the role of business in SI. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2016-0212
Minniti, M. (2004). Entrepreneurial alertness and asymmetric information in a spin-glass model. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 637-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.003
Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.003
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated.
Nandan, M., Jaskyte, K. And Mandayam, G., 2020. Human Centered Design as a New Approach to Creative Problem Solving: Its Usefulness and Applicability for Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2020.1737294
Neumeier, S., 2017. Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The geographical journal, 183(1), pp.34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12180
Noor, F. A., & Noor, F. A. (2012). This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, and Singapore.
Pick, D., Weber, P., Connell, J., Geneste, L. A., & de Klerk, S. (2015). The creative industries: an entrepreneurial bricolage perspective. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2014-0169
Puhakka, V. (2011). Developing a creative-cognitive model of entrepreneurial alertness to business opportunities. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v2n4p85
Quandt, C., Ferraresi, A., Kudlawicz, C., Martins, J., & Machado, A. (2017). SI practices in the regional tourism industry: Case study of a cooperative in Brazil. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2015-0038
Ruebottom, T. (2011). Counting Social Change: Outcome Measures For Social Enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111156628
Sadik-Rozsnyai, O. (2016). Willingness to Pay For Innovations: An Emerging European Innovation Adoption Behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(4), 568-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2016-0003
Saji, B. S., & Ellingstad, P. (2016). Social Innovation Model for Business Performance and Innovation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2015-0147
Samo, A. H. (2016). Entrepreneurial Alertness among Business School Students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies, 3(1), 127-137.
Samo, A. H., & Hashim, N. (2016). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Alertness on Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 1(6), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.16.3001
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & ccoll-Kennedy, J. R. (2011). Entrepreneurial Bricolage and Service Innovation-Based Competitive Strategy. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085-1097.
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & mccoll-Kennedy, J. R. (2013). Competing Through Service Innovation: The Role of Bricolage and Entrepreneurship in Project-Oriented Firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.005
Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial bricolage: Towards systematic empirical testing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(5), 5.
Senyard, J. M., Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Steffens, P. R. (2011). Resource Constraints in Innovation: The Role of Bricolage in New Venture Creation and Firm Development. Proceedings of the 8th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, 609-622.
Senyard, J., Davidsson, P., & Steffens, P. (2015). Bricolage and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of the Environment. In Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research Exchange Conference 2015 Proceedings (pp. 857-971).
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource‐Constrained New Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12091
Sunley, P., & Pinch, S. (2012). Financing social enterprise: social bricolage or evolutionary entrepreneurialism? Social Enterprise Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211252837
Sullivan Mort, G., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. International journal of nonprofit and voluntary sector marketing, 8(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202
Sharma, L., 2019. A Systematic Review of the Concept of Entrepreneurial Alertness. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-05-2018-0049
Sillanpää, V. (2013). Measuring the Impacts of Welfare Service Innovations. International Journal of productivity and performance management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2012-0094
Svensson, P. G., Andersson, F. O., Mahoney, T. Q., & Ha, J. P. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of social innovation: A global study of sport for development and peace organizations. Sport Management Review, 23(4), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.08.001
Svetlik, I., Stavrou‐Costea, E., & Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge Sharing and Firm Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study. International Journal of manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
Szutowski, D. (2012). 3. Classification of Innovations in Tourism Companies–Systematic. Dynamika przemian rynku turystycznego, 33(4), 782-783.
Teasdale, S., Sunley, P., & Pinch, S. (2012). Financing Social Enterprise: Social Bricolage or Evolutionary Entrepreneurialism? Social Enterprise Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211252837
Tang, J. (2008). Environmental Munificence for Entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial Alertness and Commitment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550810874664
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial Alertness in the Pursuit of New Opportunities. Journal of business venturing, 27(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001
Taylor, S.P., 2017. What Is Innovation? A Study of the Definitions, Academic Models and Applicability of Innovation to an Example of Social Housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), pp.128-146. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.511010
Thompson, N., Kiefer, K., & York, J. G. (2011). Distinctions not Dichotomies: Exploring Social, Sustainable, and Environmental Entrepreneurship. In Social and Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540(2011)0000013012
Urban, B. (2017). Corporate Entrepreneurship in South Africa: The Role of Organizational Factors and Entrepreneurial Alertness in Advancing Innovativeness. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 22(03), 1750015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946717500157
Uy, M. A., Chan, K. Y., Sam, Y. L., Ho, M. H. R., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2015). Proactivity, Adaptability and Boundary less Career Attitudes: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Alertness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.005
Valliere, D., 2013. Towards A Schematic Theory of Entrepreneurial Alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), pp.430-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.004
Witell, L., Gebauer, H., Jaakkola, E., Hammedi, W., Patricio, L., & Perks, H. (2017). A Bricolage Perspective on Service Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 79, 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.021
Yu, X., Li, Y., Su, Z., Tao, Y., Nguyen, B. And Xia, F., 2019. Entrepreneurial Bricolage and Its Effects on New Venture Growth and Adaptiveness in an Emerging Economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09657-1
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
