Civil liability of digital platforms for algorithmic transparency in the silicon society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.16.72513Keywords:
Digital platforms, Algorithmic transparency, Silicon Society, Responsibility, AccountabilityAbstract
Digital platforms have become central elements of contemporary life, exerting a profound influence on various aspects of society, including the way we consume information, make financial decisions, and participate in political processes. The opacity of algorithmic systems poses significant challenges for public and regulatory understanding of how automated decisions are made, which criteria are used, and what impacts these decisions may have on individuals and groups. The lack of transparency can lead to the perpetuation of discriminatory biases, the manipulation of information, and difficulties in holding platforms accountable when their algorithms produce harmful outcomes. In this context, this article adopts a bibliographic review as its methodology, based on the analysis of scholarly literature, scientific articles, institutional reports, and national and international regulatory frameworks, in order to investigate the responsibility of digital platforms to ensure greater algorithmic transparency, examining both the challenges faced and the emerging practices adopted by companies and regulators to mitigate associated risks.
References
ANANNY, Mike; CRAWFORD, Kate. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, v. 20, n. 3, p. 973–989, 2018.
BINNS, Reuben. Algorithmic accountability and public reason. Philosophy & Technology, v. 31, n. 4, p. 543–556, 2018.
BRASIL. Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014. Estabelece princípios, garantias, direitos e deveres para o uso da Internet no Brasil. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2025.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Dispõe sobre a proteção de dados pessoais e altera a Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (Marco Civil da Internet). Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2025.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 1.057.258/MG. Disponível em: https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5217273. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2025.
BRKAN, Maja. Do algorithms rule the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the GDPR and beyond. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v. 27, n. 2, p. 91–121, 2019.
BURRELL, Jenna. How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2016.
CRAWFORD, Kate; SCHULTZ, Jason. Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. BCL Rev., v. 55, p. 93, 2014.
CRUZ, Jefferson de Oliveira; CARVALHO, João Marcos de Oliveira; FERREIRA, Rafael Freire. A tecnologia legal baseada em inteligência artificial na tomada de decisão jurídica frente ao projeto de lei 21/2020. Diálogos & Ciência, v. 3, n. 2, p. 101-118, 2024.
DIAKOPOULOS, Nicholas. Accountability in algorithmic decision-making. Communications of the ACM, v. 59, n. 2, p. 56–62, 2016.
DONEDA, Danilo. Da privacidade à proteção de dados pessoais. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.
EUBANKS, Virgínia. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2018.
FAUSTINO, André. Sociedade do silício: inteligência artificial e a proteção da intimidade. São Paulo: Editora Lura, 2023.
GILLESPIE, Tarleton. Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press, 2018.
GOODMAN, Bryce; FLAXMAN, Seth. European Union regulations on algorithmic decision- making and a "right to explanation". AI Magazine, v. 38, n. 3, p. 50–57, 2017.
MITTELSTADT, Brent Daniel. et al. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, v. 3, n. 2, p. 1–21, 2016.
O’NEIL, Cathy. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown Publishing, 2016.
PASQUALE, Frank. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
SILVEIRA, Ana Cristina de Melo et al. Proteção de dados pessoais na sociedade da informação: entre dados e danos. Editora Foco, 2020.
TUFEKCI, Zeynep. Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
YEUNG, Karen. Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, v. 12, n. 4, p. 505–523, 2018.
ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Democratic Rights & Modern State

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a License Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the published works. The concepts issued in signed articles are the absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.
DD&EM Magazine - ISSN 2675-7648













