Mecanismo de Cooperação Regional em Arbitragem Internacional na Perspectiva do “Cinturão e Rota”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71577Palavras-chave:
Disputas em transações internacionais; arbitragem comercial internacional; cooperação regional; mecanismos cooperativosResumo
Este estudo, realizado no contexto da Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota, investiga os desafios e possíveis otimizações na cooperação regional em arbitragem comercial internacional. O atual sistema de arbitragem internacional, predominantemente influenciado por normas ocidentais e marcado por diferenças culturais-jurídicas entre os países participantes, enfrenta problemas como baixa eficiência na execução de sentenças e desenvolvimento regional desequilibrado. Utilizando o método de análise comparativa, o estudo examina sistematicamente as diferenças na legislação arbitral entre China, Singapura e outros países, complementado por estudos de casos representativos que destacam os desafios em áreas críticas como a otimização de modelos de governança institucional e a unificação de regras para arbitragem digital. O artigo propõe medidas como a adaptação cultural e o aprimoramento de redes regionais para execução de sentenças arbitrais. O objetivo é acumular experiências práticas em regiões como China-ASEAN, contribuindo para a construção de um mecanismo de cooperação em arbitragem comercial internacional mais inclusivo para os países ao longo do Cinturão e Rota.
Referências
MAC, Trang Anh. 2019. “Regionalism: Is It Essential to the Advancement of International Arbitration in ASEAN?” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533660.
Fetais, Abdulmehsen. 2023. “Arbitration In Times of Economic Uncertainty: The Role ofQatar Financial Center’s Jurisprudence in Shaping International Arbitration Principles.”International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology 10 (3): 2489–96. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.1985.
Ngo, Steve K. 2018. “International Commercial Arbitration for Belt and Road Initiative – Some Thoughts on China, Singapore and Hong Kong SAR as Dispute Resolution Locales.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323302.
Helmut, and Martin Hackl. 2024. “Rule of Law and International Commercial Arbitration.”Zeitschrift Für Europarechtliche Studien 27 (4): 486–516. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439x-2024-4-486.
Shan, Wenhua, and Yunya Feng. 2021. “The China International Commercial Court: Towards an Integrated Dispute Resolution System.” Asia Pacific Law Review 29 (1): 107–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2021.2013661.
YANYAN REN, and YIQING QIAN. 2023. “STUDY ON THE LEGAL ISSUES OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION INSTITUTION SETTLING IN CHINA.” Economic Problems and Legal Practice 19 (2): 164–70. https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2023-19-2-164-170.
Nirwal, Gauri. 2021. “Harmonization of Arbitration Laws in Some Asian and European Countries.” Pro Futuro 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.26521/profuturo/2020/4/9465.
Goh, Allison. 2021. “Digital Readiness Index for Arbitration Institutions: Challenges and Implications for Dispute Resolution Under the Belt and Road Initiative.” Journal of International Arbitration 38 (Issue 2): 253–90. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021013.
Alhashemi, Azab Alaziz. 2023. “Impact of International Arbitration Centers on Arab Arbitration Cases: A Comparative Study of the Negative Effects on Arab Dispute Resolution.” International Law Research 12 (1): 107. https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v12n1p107.
Corona, Isabel. 2015. “Arbitration Discourse.” The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi034.
Park, William W. 1983. “The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 32 (1): 21–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/32.1.21.
Peng, Shin-yi. 2023. “Digital Economy and National Security: Contextualizing Cybersecurity-Related Exceptions.” AJIL Unbound 117: 122–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2023.18.
Mubarak Opeyemi Nurudeen, Adetoyese Latilo, Hendrickx Oreoluwa Imosemi, and Queenette Anuoluwapo Imosemi. 2024. “Conceptual Model for Strengthening International Commercial Arbitration in Promoting Cross-Border Trade and Investment in Developing Economies.” Global Journal of Research in Multidisciplinary Studies 2 (1): 017–033. https://doi.org/10.58175/gjrms.2024.2.1.0037.
Mengying, Wang. 2024. “Digital Assets in International Investment Arbitration: Potential Barriers to Qualifying Investments?” Journal of Business Theory and Practice 12 (1): p57. https://doi.org/10.22158/jbtp.v12n1p57.
Stojšić-Dabetić, Jelena, and Predrag Mirković. 2024. “Digital Property: Specific Issues in the Application of Private International Law Rules.” Pravo - Teorija i Praksa 41 (4): 121–33. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2404121s.
Zheng, Fangyan. 2025. “The Application of Artificial Intelligence in International Commercial Arbitration: Technological Advancements and Legal Challenges.” International Journal of Law, Ethics and Social Sciences 2 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.70088/cb1ewj60.
Lando, Massimo. 2022. “Enhancing Conflict Resolution ‘ASEAN Way’: The Dispute Settlement System of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 13 (1): 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac001.
Chen, Meng. 2019. “Reforming Judicial Supervision of Chinese Arbitration.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 10 (4): 542–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz016.
Bjorklund, Andrea K. 2021. “Arbitration, the World Trade Organization, and the Creation of a Multilateral Investment Court.” Arbitration International 37 (2): 433–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiab015.
Dupeyré, Romain. 2014. “The Paris Arbitration Rules: A New Kind of Ad Hoc Arbitration Rules for Sophisticated Users of International Arbitration.” Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 11 (Issue 44): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2014056.
初北平.“一带一路国际商事仲裁合作联盟的构建.”现代法学 41.03(2019):181-194. (Chu Beiping.“The Construction of Belt and Road International Commercial Arbitration Cooperation Alliance.”Modern Law 41.03 (2019): 181-194.)
宋阳.“一带一路商事仲裁中国际商事惯例适用研究.”法商研究 37.02(2020):183-196. (Song Yang." Study on the Application of International Commercial Practice in Commercial Arbitration of "Belt and Road"." Legal Business Research 37.02(2020):183-196.)
高薇. “国际商事仲裁强制性规定适用问题研究.”中国法学 .06(2024):283-302.
(Gao Wei." Study on the Application of Mandatory Provisions in International Commercial Arbitration." China Jurisprudence.06(2024):283-302.)
黎群.“论国际商事仲裁合作机制的构建.”法商研究 40.03(2023):144-157.
(Li Qun, "On the Construction of International Commercial Arbitration Cooperation Mechanism", in Law and Business Studies, No. 3, 2023, pp. 144-157.)
丁丽柏,徐展鹏.“中国—东盟国际商事仲裁合作机制研究.”广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 45.05(2023):167-174 (Ding Libai, Xu Zhanpeng." Research on China-ASEAN international commercial arbitration cooperation mechanism." Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 45.05(2023):167-174.)
