Mecanismo de Cooperação Regional em Arbitragem Internacional na Perspectiva do “Cinturão e Rota”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71577Keywords:
International Transaction Disputes; International Commercial Arbitration; Regional Cooperation; Cooperative MechanismsAbstract
This paper discusses the challenges and optimization path of regional cooperation in international commercial arbitration against the background of the “Belt and Road” initiative. The current international arbitration system is subject to the double constraints of the western dominant rules and the legal and cultural differences of the countries along the route, which leads to the inefficiency of the award enforcement and the unbalanced development of the region. Through the comparative analysis method, the differences in arbitration legislation between China, Singapore and other countries are systematically examined, and the dilemmas faced in key areas such as the optimization of institutional governance model and the unification of digital arbitration rules are analyzed in conjunction with typical cases. Suggestions such as introducing cultural adaptation measures and improving the regional award enforcement network are put forward. It is hoped that China-ASEAN and other regions will accumulate practical experience and serve the countries along the Belt and Road to build a more inclusive international commercial arbitration cooperation mechanism.
References
MAC, Trang Anh. 2019. “Regionalism: Is It Essential to the Advancement of International Arbitration in ASEAN?” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533660.
Fetais, Abdulmehsen. 2023. “Arbitration In Times of Economic Uncertainty: The Role ofQatar Financial Center’s Jurisprudence in Shaping International Arbitration Principles.”International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology 10 (3): 2489–96. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.1985.
Ngo, Steve K. 2018. “International Commercial Arbitration for Belt and Road Initiative – Some Thoughts on China, Singapore and Hong Kong SAR as Dispute Resolution Locales.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323302.
Helmut, and Martin Hackl. 2024. “Rule of Law and International Commercial Arbitration.”Zeitschrift Für Europarechtliche Studien 27 (4): 486–516. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439x-2024-4-486.
Shan, Wenhua, and Yunya Feng. 2021. “The China International Commercial Court: Towards an Integrated Dispute Resolution System.” Asia Pacific Law Review 29 (1): 107–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2021.2013661.
YANYAN REN, and YIQING QIAN. 2023. “STUDY ON THE LEGAL ISSUES OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION INSTITUTION SETTLING IN CHINA.” Economic Problems and Legal Practice 19 (2): 164–70. https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2023-19-2-164-170.
Nirwal, Gauri. 2021. “Harmonization of Arbitration Laws in Some Asian and European Countries.” Pro Futuro 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.26521/profuturo/2020/4/9465.
Goh, Allison. 2021. “Digital Readiness Index for Arbitration Institutions: Challenges and Implications for Dispute Resolution Under the Belt and Road Initiative.” Journal of International Arbitration 38 (Issue 2): 253–90. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021013.
Alhashemi, Azab Alaziz. 2023. “Impact of International Arbitration Centers on Arab Arbitration Cases: A Comparative Study of the Negative Effects on Arab Dispute Resolution.” International Law Research 12 (1): 107. https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v12n1p107.
Corona, Isabel. 2015. “Arbitration Discourse.” The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi034.
Park, William W. 1983. “The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 32 (1): 21–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/32.1.21.
Peng, Shin-yi. 2023. “Digital Economy and National Security: Contextualizing Cybersecurity-Related Exceptions.” AJIL Unbound 117: 122–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2023.18.
Mubarak Opeyemi Nurudeen, Adetoyese Latilo, Hendrickx Oreoluwa Imosemi, and Queenette Anuoluwapo Imosemi. 2024. “Conceptual Model for Strengthening International Commercial Arbitration in Promoting Cross-Border Trade and Investment in Developing Economies.” Global Journal of Research in Multidisciplinary Studies 2 (1): 017–033. https://doi.org/10.58175/gjrms.2024.2.1.0037.
Mengying, Wang. 2024. “Digital Assets in International Investment Arbitration: Potential Barriers to Qualifying Investments?” Journal of Business Theory and Practice 12 (1): p57. https://doi.org/10.22158/jbtp.v12n1p57.
Stojšić-Dabetić, Jelena, and Predrag Mirković. 2024. “Digital Property: Specific Issues in the Application of Private International Law Rules.” Pravo - Teorija i Praksa 41 (4): 121–33. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2404121s.
Zheng, Fangyan. 2025. “The Application of Artificial Intelligence in International Commercial Arbitration: Technological Advancements and Legal Challenges.” International Journal of Law, Ethics and Social Sciences 2 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.70088/cb1ewj60.
Lando, Massimo. 2022. “Enhancing Conflict Resolution ‘ASEAN Way’: The Dispute Settlement System of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 13 (1): 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac001.
Chen, Meng. 2019. “Reforming Judicial Supervision of Chinese Arbitration.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 10 (4): 542–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz016.
Bjorklund, Andrea K. 2021. “Arbitration, the World Trade Organization, and the Creation of a Multilateral Investment Court.” Arbitration International 37 (2): 433–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiab015.
Dupeyré, Romain. 2014. “The Paris Arbitration Rules: A New Kind of Ad Hoc Arbitration Rules for Sophisticated Users of International Arbitration.” Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 11 (Issue 44): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2014056.
初北平.“一带一路国际商事仲裁合作联盟的构建.”现代法学 41.03(2019):181-194. (Chu Beiping.“The Construction of Belt and Road International Commercial Arbitration Cooperation Alliance.”Modern Law 41.03 (2019): 181-194.)
宋阳.“一带一路商事仲裁中国际商事惯例适用研究.”法商研究 37.02(2020):183-196. (Song Yang." Study on the Application of International Commercial Practice in Commercial Arbitration of "Belt and Road"." Legal Business Research 37.02(2020):183-196.)
高薇. “国际商事仲裁强制性规定适用问题研究.”中国法学 .06(2024):283-302.
(Gao Wei." Study on the Application of Mandatory Provisions in International Commercial Arbitration." China Jurisprudence.06(2024):283-302.)
黎群.“论国际商事仲裁合作机制的构建.”法商研究 40.03(2023):144-157.
(Li Qun, "On the Construction of International Commercial Arbitration Cooperation Mechanism", in Law and Business Studies, No. 3, 2023, pp. 144-157.)
丁丽柏,徐展鹏.“中国—东盟国际商事仲裁合作机制研究.”广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 45.05(2023):167-174 (Ding Libai, Xu Zhanpeng." Research on China-ASEAN international commercial arbitration cooperation mechanism." Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 45.05(2023):167-174.)
