For a critical hermeneutics of “women’s tradition” in literature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/rct.i34.66709

Keywords:

Literature, feminist literary criticism, hermeneutics, critique of ideologies, Paul Ricoeur

Abstract

This essay reviews the dichotomy between hermeneutics and the critique of ideologies as put forth by Paul Ricoeur, particularly concerning the ways each of these philosophical gestures view the concept of tradition, in order to compare this dichotomy to certain oscillations observed throughout the history of feminist literary criticism. The way tradition is read by feminist criticism first as an oppressive force to be opposed, secondly as a positive search for the past (in the reconfiguration of a particularly female tradition [Showalter, 1977]), and lastly as a problem to be criticized once again, even in its “feminist version”, points to a fluctuation between the critical gesture and the hermeneutic impulse, contained in the same field of studies. Feminist literary criticism may therefore be recognized as a twofold field with a dynamic vocation. The bridges and connections offered by Ricoeur between hermeneutics and the critique of ideology may, perhaps, inspire a clearer distinction between these movements, as well as the dialogue between positions at first seen as antithetical within feminist literary criticism.

Author Biography

Erica Martinelli Munhoz, Unicamp

Doutora em Teoria Literária pelo Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem (UNICAMP). Contato: ericammz@hotmail.com

References

BACHELARD, Gaston. Fragmentos de Uma Poética do Fogo. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1990.

BACHELARD, Gaston. O ar e os sonhos: ensaio sobre a imaginação do movimento. Tradução Antonio de Pádua Danesi. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.

CLOUGH, Patricia Ticineto. The Hybrid Criticism of Patriarchy: Rereading Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics. Sociological Quarterly. 35(3). Abril, 2005. pp. 473 – 486.

COSTA, Cristina H. “A hermenêutica crítica de Paul Ricoeur posta à prova da imaginação feminina”. Remate de Males. 35.2. Jul/Dez 2015. file:///C:/Users/user/OneDrive/novos%20artigos/artigo%20Ricoeur/A_hermeneutica_critica_de_Paul_Ricoeur_posta_a_pro.pdf

ERKKILA, Betsy. The Wicked Sisters: Women Poets, Literary History and Discord. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

FIGES, Eva.: Patriarchal Attitudes. Women in Society.Nova York: Persea Books, 1970.

FIRESTONE, Shulamith. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. Nova Yok: Morrow Editions, 1970.

FRIEDAN, Betty. Mística Feminina. Tradução de Áurea B. Weissenberg. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes Limitadas. 1971.

HALSEMA, Annemie; HENRIQUES, Fernanda (eds). Feminist explorations of Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2016.

LAFUENTE, Maria Avelina Cecilia. “Introducción al pensamento de Paul Ricoeur. Themata Revista de Filosofia. N 19, 1998, pp. 219-223. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/27375/file_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

MILLETT, Kate.: Sexual Politics. Nova York: Doubleday, 1970.

PLAIN, Gill; SELLERS, Susan (Eds.). A History of Feminist Literary Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

RICOEUR, Paul. Do texto à ação. Ensaios de Hermenêutica II. Tradução de Alcino Cartaxo e Maria José Sarabando. Porto: RÉS-Editora, 1990.

RICOEUR, Paul. Tempo d Narrativa 3. O tempo narrado. Tradução Claudia Berliner. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.

SHOWALTER, Elaine. A literature of their own: British women novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.

WILLIAMS, Linda R. “Happy Families? Feminist reproduction and matrilineal thought.” In.: ARMSTRONG, Isobel. New Feminist Discourses: Critical essays on theories and texts. London: Rotledge, 1992. pp. 48-64.

WOOLF, Virginia. Um quarto só seu e três ensaios sobre as grandes escritoras inglesas: Jane Austen, Charlotte & Emily Bronte e George Eliot. Tradução Julia Romeu. São Sebastião: Bazar do Tempo, 2021.

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

Martinelli Munhoz, E. (2025). For a critical hermeneutics of “women’s tradition” in literature. Revista De Cultura Teológica, 35(111), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.23925/rct.i34.66709