Many hands on this study: Development of a metonymy comprehension task
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202339350607Palavras-chave:
metonymy, metonymy comprehension, figurative language, psycholinguistic task elaboration, Cognitive LinguisticsResumo
Metonymy is a pervasive linguistic/cognitive mechanism in everyday language. Still, studies assessing its comprehension are rare in the literature. Our goal is to present the elaboration of a verbal metonymy comprehension task in Brazilian Portuguese as well as test it using pilot studies. The task was based on the cognitive linguistics framework and psychometric guidelines were considered. The construction of the task considered psycholinguistic variables and included a conventionality task and an expert analysis. Three studies (N = 290, ages ranging 2 to 54 years old) were conducted until we reached a final version. The study resulted in a task composed of one practice item and six test items. Each item includes a sentence-stimulus and two questions (one open-ended and one closed-ended). Together, the items make up a raw score that represents metonymy comprehension. Data obtained from the pilot studies show that metonymy comprehension improves gradually with age and that there is a significant difference between items in both types of questions. This is in consonance with the literature, and thus points towards the instrument’s construct validity. The study results in a task that presents enough sensitivity to gauge comprehension of this phenomenon at different ages.
Referências
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Barcelona, A. S. (2000). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. De Gruyter Mouton.
De Leon, V., Siqueira, M., Parente, M., & Bosa, C. (2007). Especificidade da compreensão metafórica em crianças com autismo. Psico, 38(3), 269-277. https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/1454 (Acessado 01 março, 2023).
Falkum, I. L., Recasens, M., & Clark, E. V. (2017). “The moustache sits down first”: on the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 87-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000720
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366-1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1366
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960601017013
Goossens, L. (1990) Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
Köder, F., & Falkum, I. L. (2020). Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.
Melogno, S., & Pinto, M. A. (2014). Enhancing metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Psychology, 5(11), 1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.511148
Nerlich, B., Clarke, D. D., & Todd, Z. (1999). Mummy, I like being a sandwich. Metonymy in Language Acquisition. In K. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 361-383). John Benjamins.
Panther, K. U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (1999). Metonymy in Language and Thought . John Benjamins.
Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236-263). Oxford University Press.
Pasquali, L. (2010). Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Artmed.
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010a). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism, 14(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309340667
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010b). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X454373
Siqueira, M. (2004). As metáforas primárias na aquisição da linguagem: um estudo interlinguístico [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Sul, Porto Alegre. http://www.leffa.pro.br/tela4/Textos/Textos/Anais/Textos_Em_Psicolin/TESES%20DOUTORADO/As%20Met%C3%A1foras%20Prim%C3%A1rias%20Na%20Aquisi%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Da%20Linguagem-%20Um%20Estudo%20Interling%C3%BC%C3%ADstico.pdf (Acessado 01 março, 2023).
Siqueira, M., & Gibbs Jr, R. (2007). Children’s acquisition of primary metaphors: a crosslinguistic study. Organon, 21(43), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.39590
Siqueira, M., & Lamprecht, R. (2007). As metáforas primárias na aquisição da linguagem: um estudo interlinguístico . Delta, 23(2), 245-272. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502007000200004
Siqueira, M., Parente, M., & Gil, M. (2009). Metáfora e cultura: uma interface entre a Linguística e a Antropologia. Antares: Letras e Humanidades, 2, 99-111. https://professor.ufrgs.br/maity/files/2009._siqueira_parente_gil.pdf (Acessado 01 março, 2023).
Siqueira, M., & Marques, D. (2018). Desenvolvimento e validação do instrumento de compreensão de expressões idiomáticas. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 26(2), 571-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.26.2.571-591
Theodoropoulou, M. (2021). “Has she got a mouth?” Metonymy, salience, and experience in a child’s speech. 14ο Διεθνές Συνέδριο Ελληνικής Γλωσσολογίας, 1(1), 1269-1277. https://doi.org/10.26220/icgl.v1i1.3759
Van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D., & Rundblad, G. (2013). Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1300-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.017
Urbina, S. (2014). Essentials of psychological testing. John Wiley & Sons.
Van Herwegen, J., & Rundblad, G. (2018). A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children, adolescents, and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00945
Xie S (2022) The developmental trajectory of mandarin Chinese-speaking children’s pure metonymy comprehension ability. Forum for Linguistic Studies 4(1): 78-99. https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v4i1.1457
Zheng, Q., Jia, Z., & Liang, D. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy comprehension in Chinese-speaking children with high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 10, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.007
Zhu, R. (2021). Preschoolers’ acquisition of producer-product metonymy. Cognitive Development, 59, 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101075
