Analysis of knowledge by Brazilian speech therapists about the battery Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech

Authors

  • Cilmara Cristina Alves da Costa Levy Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-8331
  • Thais Talarico Rodrigues Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2023v35i4e62835

Keywords:

Hearing loss, Cochlear implants, Hearing aids, Protocols

Abstract

Introduction: The advancement of hearing technologies has helped hearing-impaired children to hear, but it is necessary to monitor the development of hearing and oral language skills. Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze the knowledge of Brazilian speech therapists about the EARS battery, which presents nine protocols for evaluating the development of auditory and oral language skills. Method: This is a quantitative and qualitative, cross-sectional, descriptive study. Data collection was carried out using the Google Forms in a digital environment. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions, four about the professional’s profile and nine about their knowledge and/or use of protocols proposed by the EARS battery. 67 participants responded to this study. Results: Of this total, 70% work directly in speech therapy, 41% work in both private and public services. 97% consider it important to use protocols for evaluating and monitoring auditory and oral language skills and 92% feel that validated protocols are lacking. Regarding the use of EARS battery protocols, it was found that the most common are MUSS, MAIS, GASP and MTP. Conclusion: The tests that Brazilian speech therapists most adopt are the MUSS, MAIS, GASP and MPT. Most use more than one protocol in assessment, monitoring and even rehabilitation. However, it is noted that there is still a lack of validated protocols to cover the stages of development of auditory and oral language skills in children with hearing impairment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Romeo RR, Leonard JA, Robinson ST, West MR, Mackey AL, Rowe ML, et al. Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(5): 700–10. doi: 10.1177/0956797617742725

Zhao, T. C., Corrigan, N. M., Yarnykh, V. L., Kuhl, P. K. (2022). Development of executive function-relevant skills is related to both neural structure and function in infants. Developmental Science, 25, e13323. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13323

Brasil. Lei nº 12.303, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12303.htm

Bicas RS, Guijo LM, Delgado-Pinheiro EMC. Habilidades auditivas e de comunicação oral de crianças e adolescentes deficientes auditivos e o processo de reabilitação fonoaudiológica. Rev. CEFAC. 2017; 19(4): 465–74. doi: 10.1590/1982-0216201719412516

Monshizadeh L, Vameghi R, Rahimi M, Sajedi F, Hashemi SB, Yadegari F, Kasbi F. Is There Any Association Between Language Acquisition and Cognitive Development in Cochlear-Implanted Children? J Int Adv Otol. 2021 May; 17(3): 195-199. doi: 10.5152/iao.2021.8990. PMID: 34100742; PMCID: PMC9450217.

Jiang F, Alimu D, Qin WZ, Kupper H. Long-term functional outcomes of hearing and speech rehabilitation efficacy among paediatric cochlear implant recipients in Shandong, China. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 43(20): 2860-2865. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1720317. Epub 2020 Feb 5. PMID: 32024407.

Sheikh M, Noreen H, Khalid H, Irshad A, Sultana R, Ul Ain Q. (2023). Factors Influencing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children Following Early Use of Hearing Aids. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 3(1). Retrieved from https://jhrlmc.com/index.php/home/article/view/37

Giusti E, Befi-Lopes DM. Tradução e adaptação transcultural de instrumentos estrangeiros para o Português Brasileiro (PB). Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 2008;20(3):207–10. doi: 10.1590/S0104-56872008000300012

Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Allum JHJ, Baumgartner W. et al. Multi-language international perceptual test battery for comparing performance of children in different countries: evaluation of auditory responses to speech (EARS). 3rd Eur Symp Pediatr Cochlear Implant, Hannover; 1996.

Alves M, Ramos D, Oliveira G, Alves H, Anderson I, Magalhães I, et al. Adaptação da bateria de testes EARS ao português europeu. Acta Med Port. 2014; 27(1): 23–32.

Allum JH, Greisiger R, Straubhaar S, Carpenter MG. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. Br J Audiol. 2000; 34(5): 293–303. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000141

Sainz M, Skarzynski H, Allum JHJ, Helms J, Rivas A, Martin J. et al. Assessment of auditory skills in 140 cochlear implant children using the EARS protocol. ORL J Otorrinolaringol Relat Spec. 2003; 65(2): 91–6. doi: 10.1159/000070772.

Esser-Leyding B, Anderson I. EARS® (Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech): an internationally validated assessment tool for children provided with cochlear implants. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2012; 74(1): 42–51. doi: 10.1159/000335054

Popov TM, Stancheva I, Kachakova D, Rangachev J, Konov D, Varbanova V, et al. Auditory outcome after cochlear implantation in patients with congenital nonsyndromic hearing loss: influence of the GJB2 status. Otol Neurotol. 2014; 35(8): 1361–5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000348

AlSanosi A, Hassan SM. The effect of age at cochlear implantation outcomes in Saudi children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 78(2): 272–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.021

Nandurkar A, Susmitha CG. Listening skill progress in children with cochlear implants in the first three months after implantation, Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 3(3): 632–8. doi: 10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20173038

Nikolopoulos TP, Wells P, Archbold SM. Using Listening Progress Profile (LiP) to assess early functional auditory performance in young implanted children. Deafness Education Int. 2000; 2(3): 142–51. doi:10.1179/146431500790561125

Ngui LX, Tang IP, Rajan P, Prepageran N. Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implant in children and adults—a literature review and clinical experience. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2017; 5: 304–14. doi: 10.1007/s40136-017-0165-1

Silva BCS, Moret AL, Silva LTN, Costa AO, Alvarenga KF, Silva-Comerlatto MP. Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP): marcadores clínicos de desenvolvimento das habilidades de reconhecimento e compreensão auditiva em crianças usuárias de implante coclear. CoDAS. 2019; 31(4): e20180142 doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018142

Rawes C, Ngaage LM, Mackenzie R, Martin J, Cordingley A, Raine C. A review of the outcomes of children with designated additional needs receiving cochlear implantation for severe to profound hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021; 22(6): 338–44. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1944519.

Ferreira AA. A relação entre estilos parentais e desenvolvimento auditivo em crianças usuárias de implante coclear. Dissertação, UFMG; 2021.

Lee M, Cho S. The changes of auditory performance after cochlear implantation in child with KID syndrome. Audiol. 2011; 7(1): 84–8 doi: 10.21848/audiol.2011.7.1.84

Melo ME, Levy CCAC. Abordagem centrada na família de serviços fonoaudiológicos para bebês e crianças pequenas surdas. In: Levy CCAC. Manual de audiologia pediátrica. 2a edição. Ed Manole; 2022. p.165–75.

Nascimento LT. Uma proposta de avaliação da linguagem oral [monografia]. Bauru: Hospital de Pesquisa e Reabilitação de Lesões Lábio-Palatais, 1997. Adaptado de: Robins AM, Osberger MJ. Meaningful use of speech scales. Indianápolis: University of Indiana School of Medicine; 1990.

Estima NF, Miguel JHS, Azevedo MF, Gil D. Categorias auditivas e de linguagem em crianças usuárias de Implante Coclear. Distúrb Comum. 2022; 34(3): e5556. doi: 10.23925/2176-2724.2022v34i3e55560

Bevilacqua MC, Tech EA. Elaboração de um procedimento de avaliação de percepção de fala em crianças deficientes auditivas profundas a partir de cinco anos de idade. In: Tópicos em Fonoaudiologia 1996. São Paulo: Lovise; 1996.

Erber NP. Auditory communication for deaf children. Australia: aCER press; 2011.

May-Mederake B; Shechata-Dieler W. A case study assessing the auditory and speech development of four children implanted with cochlear implants by the chronological age of 12 months. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013; 2013: 359218. doi: 10.1155/2013/359218

Orlandi AC, Bevilacqua MC. Deficiência auditiva profunda nos primeiros anos de vida: procedimento para a avaliação da percepção da fala. Pró-Fono. 1998; 10(2): 87–91.

Wertzner HF. Fonologia (Parte A). In: Andrade CRF, Befi-Lopes DM, Fernandes FDM, Wertzner HF. ABFW: Teste de linguagem infantil: nas áreas de fonologia, vocabulário, fluência e pragmática. Carapicuíba: Pró-Fono; 2000. Cap 1. p. 5–40.

Published

2024-02-27

How to Cite

Levy, C. C. A. da C., & Rodrigues, T. T. (2024). Analysis of knowledge by Brazilian speech therapists about the battery Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech. Distúrbios Da Comunicação, 35(4), e62835. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2023v35i4e62835

Issue

Section

Artigos