Habilidades de procesamiento auditivo en pruebas de patrones de tono y duración para ancianos:
una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2021v33i3p447-461Palabras clave:
Revisión sistemática, Envejecimiento, Percepción auditiva, Pruebas de audición, AudiologíaResumen
Objetivo: analizar el desempeño de ancianos con hipoacusia en comparación con ancianos con audición normal en la prueba de patrones de frecuencia (PPF) y duración (PPD). Estrategia de búsqueda: Se desarrollaron estrategias de búsqueda electrónica individualmente para las siguientes bases de datos: LILACS, LIVIVO, Pubmed, Scopus, SpeechBITE y Web of Science. Se realizaron búsquedas en literatura gris utilizando Google Scholar, OpenGrey y Proquest Dissertations and Theses. Criterios de selección: Se incluyeron estudios observacionales que evaluaron a ancianos (mayores de 60 años) con pérdida auditiva relacionada con la edad o presbiacusia, que van de leve a moderadamente severa, con puntajes diferentes en comparación con ancianos con audición normal en PPF y PPD. La metodología de los estudios seleccionados se evaluó utilizando herramientas de evaluación crítica Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MAStARI) para estudios transversales. No se aplicaron restricciones en cuanto a idioma, período de publicación o género. Resultados: Se analizaron el título y resumen de 1042 artículos después de eliminar los duplicados. A partir de este análisis, se analizaron los textos completos de 15 artículos. Se incluyeron cinco estudios en esta revisión sistemática, tres utilizaron el PPD en la versión Musiek y dos en la versión Auditec del PPF y PPD. El riesgo de sesgo fue bajo (tres estudios) y moderado (dos estudios), según este protocolo. Conclusión: Esta revisión sistemática no mostró diferencias en las puntuaciones entre los grupos con presbiacusia en comparación con la audición normal en PPF y PPD. Se necesitan más estudios primarios que utilicen el mismo protocolo para PPF y PPD.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
American Academy of Audiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. 2010; https://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/CAPD%20Guidelines%208-2010.pdf_539952af956c79.73897613.pdf, 2018.
British Society of Audiology. Auditory processing disorder (APD) position statement and practice guidance 2018; www.thebsa.org.uk/resources/position-statement-practice-guidance-auditory-processing-disorder-apd/.
British Society of Audiology. Position statement auditory processing disorder APD. 2011; http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_APD_PositionPaper_31March11_FINAL.pdf, 2018.
Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Three commonly asked questions about central auditory processing disorders: Assessment. Am J Audiol. 1994; 3: 23-7.
Moore DR, Rosen S, Bamiou D-E, Campbell NG, Sirimanna T. Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): a British Society of Audiology APD special interest group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2013; 52: 3-13.
Cooper JJ, Gates GA. Hearing in the elderly--the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985: Part II. Prevalence of central auditory processing disorders. Ear Hear. 1991; 12: 304-11.
Jerger J, Jerger S, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear. 1989; 10: 79-89.
Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear. 1994; 15: 274-86.
Humes LE, Coughlin M, Talley L. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol. 1996; 7: 419-27.
Schoof T, Rosen S. The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014; 6: 307.
Lima IMdS, Miranda-Gonsalez ECd. Efeitos da perda auditiva, escolaridade e idade no processamento temporal de idosos. Rev CEFAC. 2016; 18: 33-9.
Emanuel DC. The auditory processing battery: Survey of common practices. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 93-117.
Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994; 5: 265-68.
Parra VM, Iório MCM, Mizahi MM, Dos S. Baraldi G. Frequency and duration patterns tests in elderly people with normal hearing sensitivity. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2004; 70: 517-23.
Murphy CFB, Rabelo CM, Silagi ML, Mansur LL, Bamiou DE, Schochat E. Auditory Processing Performance of the Middle-Aged and Elderly: Auditory or Cognitive Decline? J Am Acad Audiol. 2018; 29: 5-14.
Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 467-74.
Kumar U, AV S. Temporal processing abilities across different age groups. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22: 5-12.
Bellis TJ, Ross J. Performance of normal adults and children on central auditory diagnostic tests and their corresponding visual analogs. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011; 22: 491-500.
Casaprima V, Jannelli A, Lobo M, Martínez E, Lizarraga A. Obtaining normative values in the evaluation of central auditory function. Rev Med Rosario. 2013; 79: 73-7.
Corazza MCA. Avaliação do processamento auditivo central em adultos: teste de padrões tonais auditivos de frequência e teste de padrões tonais auditivos de duração [doctoral dissertation]. São Paulo, UNIFESP; 1998.
Dias TLL. Resolução temporal e cognição no idoso saudável [dissertation], UNIFESP; 2010.
Fuente A, McPherson B. Auditory processing tests for Spanish-speaking adults: an initial study. Int J Audiol. 2006; 45: 645-59.
Majak J, Zamysłowska-Szmytke E, Rajkowska E, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Auditory temporal processing tests – Normative data for polish-speaking adults. Med Pr. 2015; 66: 145-52.
Marshall EK, Jones AL. Evaluating test data for the duration pattern test and pitch pattern test. Speech, Lang Hear. 2017; 20: 241-6.
Neijenhuis KA, Stollman MH, Snik AF, Van der Broek P. Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Int J Audiol. 2001; 40: 69-77.
Sanchez ML, Nunes FB, Barros F, Ganança MM, Caovilla HH. Auditory Processing Assessment in older people with no report of hearing disability. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 74: 896-902.
Tsang K-m. Norms for the pitch pattern sequence (PPS) test for Cantonese adults. In: The University of Hong Kong; 2003.
Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Int J Audiol. 1990; 29: 304-13.
Azzolini VC, Ferreira MIDdC. Temporal auditory processing in elders. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 14: 95-102.
Liporaci FD, Frota SMMC. Envelhecimento e ordenação temporal auditiva. Rev CEFAC. 2010; 12: 741-8.
Mesquita LG, Pereira LD. Processamento temporal em idosos: o efeito da habilidade de resolução temporal em tarefas de ordenação de série de sons. Rev CEFAC. 2013; 15: 1163-9.
Peixe BP, Sanguebuche TR, Maiavolta VC, Garcia MV. O estudo de respostas a testes de processamento auditivo em um grupo de idosos. Rev. CEFAC. 2019; 21(6): e13818.
Neijenhuis K, Tschur H, Snik A. The effect of mild hearing impairment on auditory processing tests. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15: 6-16.
Gallun FJ, McMillan GP, Molis MR, Kampel SD, Dann SM, Konrad-Martin DL. Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity1. Front Neurosci (Print). 2014; 8: 172.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 264-9.
Prospero. International Prospective Register of Sistematic Reviews https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=105972. Accessed 17/08, 2018.
Federal S. Estatuto do idoso. Brasília (DF): Senado Federal. 2003.
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetc R, et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute 2017; https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/
Cochrane T. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre 2008; https://nordic.cochrane.org/nordic-cochrane-centre-copenhagen
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-98.
Musiek FE, Chermak GD, Weihing J, Zappulla M, Nagle S. Diagnostic accuracy of established central auditory processing test batteries in patients with documented brain lesions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011; 22: 342-58.
Pinheiro M, Musiek F. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates. 1985: 219-38.
Neijenhuis K, Snik A, Priester G, van Kordenoordt S, van den Broek P. Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41: 334-46.
Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Frequency Patterns in Cochlear, Brainstem, and Cerebral Lesions: Reconnaissance mélodique dans les lésions cochléaires, bulbaires et corticales. Int J Audiol. 1987; 26: 79-88.
Mattos LC, Veras RP. A prevalência da perda auditiva em uma população de idosos da cidade do Rio de Janeiro: um estudo seccional. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 73: 654-9.
Megale RL, Iório MCM, Schochat E. Treinamento auditivo: avaliação do benefício em idosos usuários de próteses auditivas. Pró-Fono. 2010; 22: 101-6.
Perrella AC, Branco-Barreiro FC. Avaliação da função auditiva central em idosos e suas contribuições para a adaptação de próteses auditivas. Distúrb Comun. 2005; 17: 333-46.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) auditory processing disorder. 2005; https://www.asha.org/content.aspx?id=10737450473, 2018.
Alonso R. Avaliação eletrofisiológica e comportamental do processamento auditivo (central) e treinamento auditivo em indivíduos idosos [doctoral dissertation], Universidade de São Paulo; 2011.
Musiek FE. The frequency pattern test: a guide. Hear J. 2002; 55: 58.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Debora Bonizio Zukowski, Sheila Andreoli Balen, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Isabella Monteiro de Castro Silva, Lucas Moura Viana, André Luiz Porporatti
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
