When actors organize to deorganize
an integrative review on the work of interrupting institutionalized practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2020v35i3p.70-86Keywords:
Institutional Theory, Institutional Work, DeinstitutionalizationAbstract
This study aims to conduct an integrative literature review on the process of
deinstitutionalization. We sought to understand the advances in the works that are based on the
discussion about the deinstitutionalization work. Lawrence and Suddaby (2006) point to the
need for work from the perspective of institutional work, especially empirical studies. As a
methodological approach, an integrative review of the international literature on institutional
deinstitutionalization work was carried out on the international bases of journals indexed to the
Capes, Scopus and Web of Science journals. The integrative review pointed out not only the
situation of the field with its mature and emerging themes, as well as the theoretical and
methodological aspects, but also new directions for the field. Altogether, nine empirical studies
were completed. As an emerging field, it was observed the plurality of institutional fields in the
process of investigating deinstitutionalization practices, which corroborates the need for greater
attention to approach in institutional work with the approximation of other theoretical
approaches. The analyzed studies present challenges to be explored in the field of Institutional
Theory, which proves to be an open field for dialogue with other approaches.
References
BATTILANA, J.; D'AUNNO, T. Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency. In: LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cap. 2, p. 31-59.
BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; MACEDO, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Revista Eletrônica Gestão e Sociedade, v. 4, n. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.
BOUMA, G. Distinguishing institutions and organisations in social change. Journal of Sociology, v.3, n. 3,p. 232–245, 1998.
CANNON, S. M.; DONNELLY-COX, G. Surviving the Peace: Organizational Responses to Deinstitutionalization of Irish Peacebuilding. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 360-378, 2015.
CHAUDHRY, S.; RUBERY, J. Why do established practices deinstitutionalize? An actor- centered approach. British Journal of Management, v. 00, p.1-20, 2017.
DIMAGGIO, P. J.; POWELL, W. W. Introduction. In: POWELL, W.W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J.
The new institucionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 1-38.
GILMORE, S.; SILLINCE, J. Institutional theory and change: the deinstitutionalisation of sports science at Club X. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 314-330, 2014.
HASSELBALCH, J. Professional disruption in health regulation: electronic cigarettes in the European Union. Journal of Professions and Organization, v. 3, n. 1, p. 62-85, 2016.
HUQ, J.-L. Conditioning a Professional Exchange Field for Social Innovation. Business & Society, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1047–1082, 2019.
JARVIS, L. C.; GOODRICK, E.; HUDSON, B. A. Where the heart functions best: Reactive– affective conflict and the disruptive work of animal rights organizations. Academy of Management Journal, v. 62, n. 5, p. 1358-1387, 2019.
KARAM, C.; JAMALI, D. (2013). Gendering CSR in the Arab Middle East: An Institutional Perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 23, n. 1, p. 31-68, 2013.
LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R. Institutions and Institutional Work. S. R. CLEGG, C. HARDY, T. B. LAWRENCE; W.R., NORD (eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies. 215-254. Sage. March, JG (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 2006.
LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R; LECA, B. Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work. In Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R; LECA, B. Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20 n.1, p. 52-58, 2011.
LAWRENCE, T. B.; LECA, B.; ZILBER, T. B. Institutional Work: Current Research, New Directions and Overlooked Issues. Organization Studies, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1023-1033, 2013.
MAGUIRE, S.; HARDY, C. Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The Decline of DDT. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 52, n. 1, 148-178, 2009.
MOTHERWAY, D.; PAZZAGLIA, F.; SONPAR, K. Failures in Regulator-Led Deinstitutionalization of Questionable Business Practices. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 149, n. 3, p. 627-641, 2018.
OLIVER, C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Process. Academy of Management Review, v. 16 n. 1, p. 145-179, 1991.
OLIVER, C. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization studies, v. 13, n. 4, p. 563- 588, 1992.
PECI, A. A nova teoria institucional em estudos organizacionais: uma abordagem crítica.Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-12, 2006.
PEREIRA, F. A. M.A evolução da teoria institucional nos estudos organizacionais: um campo de pesquisa a ser explorado. Revista Organizações em Contexto, v. 8, n. 16, p. 275-295, 2012.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
TORRACO, R. J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356–367, 2005.
TORRACO, R. J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 15, n. 4, p. 404-428, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Pensamento & Realidade
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os autores concedem à revista todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os conceitos emitidos em artigos assinados são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.