Strategic Pathology of Sports and Youth Departments of Hamadan Province in the Field of Sports Based on the SWOT Model, Iran

Bisotoon Azizi; Rasoul Monem; Mohammad Mohammadi

doi:10.23925/2178-0080.2021v23i2.49619

Autores

Bisotoon Azizi Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, IranCorresponding Author: Email: bistonazizi@gmail.comORCID ID: https:orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-4935 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-4935
Rasoul Monem PhD student in Sports Management, Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran Email: Monem1346@gmail.com ORCID ID: https:orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-633X https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-633X
Mohammad Mohammadi Lecture, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran Email: M.mohammadi@malayeru.ac.ir ORCID ID: https:orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-0648

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2021v23i2.49619

Palavras-chave:

Patologia Estratégica, Departamento de Esportes da Juventude, Provincia de Hamadan, Análise SWOT

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi compreender a patologia estratégica dos departamentos de esportes e juventude da província de Hamadan, Irã, com base no modelo SWOT. O método de pesquisa é um levantamento. O método utilizado foi o inquérito e a amostra foi constituída por 135 pessoas. 12 especialistas em esportes confirmaram a validade do questionário (Alpha Cronbach α = 0,89). A análise compara as médias e o teste de Friedman e para determinar a posição estratégica, matrizes de avaliação de fatores internos (IFE), avaliação de fatores externos (EFE) e matriz interna e externa (IE). A este respeito, conclui-se que; Os formuladores de políticas esportivas do Hamadan e aqueles envolvidos em esportes devem se concentrar mais em usar as oportunidades existentes, usando seus pontos fortes internos em duas áreas: esportes públicos e campeonatos.

Metrics

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2013). Are selling, general and ‎administrative costs "Sticky"? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1): 47- 63.‎

Ball, R & Shiva kumar, L. (2005). ‎‏Earnings Quality In Uk Private Firms: Comparative Loss ‎Recognition Timeliness‏‎. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1): 83-128.‎

Barzideh. Farrokh, Kaffash Panjeshahi. Mohammad, Shariatpanahi. Seyed Majid, Taghavifard. ‎Mohammad Taghi (2016). Stock Pricing Model Based on Prospect ‎Theory. Journal of Financial Research, 8 (1): 59-76.‎

Beaver, W.H (1989). ‎‏Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution‏. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.‎‏ ‏Prentice Hall.‎

Biddle, G. C., Hilary, G. and Verdi, R. S. (2009). ‎‏"‏How does financial reporting quality improve ‎investment efficiency?‎‏‎ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48: 112-131.‎

Bushman, R.M., Smith, A.J. (2003). Financial Accounting Information and corporate ‎governance. Journal of Accounting Economics, 31: 237-333.‎

Collingwood, H. (2001). The Earnings Game: Everyone Plays, Nobody Wins. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 65-74

Easley, D., OHara, M., (2004). Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance ‎‎(August).‎

Fridson, M. and Alvarez, F. (2002). Financial Statement Analysis – A Practitioner’s Guide‏‎. 3rd ‎Ed. University Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons‏.‏

Hens, T., Vlcek, M., (2011). Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? Journal of ‎Behavioral Finance, 12: 141–157.‎

Hirshleifer, D., Kewei H. & Siew Hong Teoh (2009). Accruals, cash flows, and aggregate ‎stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91: 389-406.‎

Hunton, J. E. (2005). Toward an Understanding of the Risky Choice Behavior of ‎Professional Financial Analysts. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(4): 182–189.‎

Jahan Khani, A. Saffarian, A (2005). stock market response to the announcement of profit per ‎share in tehran stock exchange. Financial Research Journal, 16: 81 - 81(in Persian).‎

Khajavi, Sh. Fattahi Naghchi, H (2013). Neuro finance, Perspective of Behavioral Finance. ‎Journal of Investment Knowledge, 2 (7): 34 – 21 (in Persian).‎

Lajevardi, M. Faez, A (2018). Investigation the effect of cognitive errors on ‎the type of investment: evidence on Tehran stock exchange. Second International Conference ‎on Management and Development Culture, Tehran, Mobin institution (in Persian).‎

Moshtaghi. Yousef, Yazdani. Naser (2017). Studying the influence of psychological factors ‎with orientation perceptual errors on Decision making process of individual investors. ‎Journal of Financial Research, 18 (4): 735-752. ‎

‎O'Donnell Ed & Joseph J. Schultz Jr (2016). The Halo Effect in Business Risk Audits: Can ‎Strategic Risk Assessment Bias Auditor Judgment about Accounting Details? The ‎Accounting Review, 80 (3): 921-939.‎

Saghafi. Ali, Farhadi. Rohollah, Taghavi Fard. Mohammad Tafhi (2015). Beta Risk: Evidence ‎from Landscape Theory. Journal of Experimental Studies in Financial Accounting, 12 (45): 38-9 ‎‎(in Persian).‎

Sher anaghiz S, Hasas yeganeh Y, sadidi M, narrei B. (2017). Sentimental decision-making of ‎investors, Corporate governance and Investment efficiency. Quarterly Financial Accounting ‎Journal, 8 (32) :1-37 (in Persian).‎

Shiffrin, H., (2007). Behavioral Corporate Finance: Decision that Create Value‏. McGraw ‎Hill Press‏.‏

Statman, M. (2014). ‎‏Behavioral finance: Finance With Normal People‏‎. Borsa Istanbul ‎Review, 14: 65-73. ‎

Utami Intiyas, Wijaya Kusuma, Gudono & Supriyadi (2018). Halo Effect in Analytical ‎Procedure: The Impact of Client Profile an Information Scope. ‎Global Journal of Business Research, 8(32): 9-26.‎

Wang, L. X., Shi, K., Xia Fan, H., (2017). Psychological Mechanisms of Investors in Chinese ‎Stock Markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27: 762-780.‎