O conceito de religião
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1677-1222.2021vol22i2a15Resumo
Texto publicado originalmente em 28 de março de 2022 na The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/concept-religion/>. A tradução segue a versão nos arquivos do SEP, disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/concept-religion/>. Esta versão traduzida, portanto, pode diferir da versão final, que pode ter sido atualizada desde o momento desta tradução. A versão atual está disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concept-religion/> e <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concept-religion/notes.html>. Gostaríamos de agradecer ao autor e editores da Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy por conceder permissão para traduzir e publicar este verbete na REVER. O tradutor optou por manter a formatação original do verbete, estando fora das normas típicas de submissão da REVER.
Referências
Abbasi, Rushain, 2020, “Did Premodern Muslims Distinguish the Religious and the Secular? The Dīn-Dunyā Binary in Medieval Islamic Thought”, Journal of Islamic Studies, 31(2): 185–225. doi:10.1093/jis/etz048
Abbasi, Rushain, 2021, “Islam and the Invention of Religion: A Study of Medieval Muslim Discourses on Dīn”, Studia Islamica, 116(1): 1–106.
Albanese, Catherine, 1981, America: Religions and Religion, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Alston, William P., 1964, The Philosophy of Language, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alston, William P., 1967, “Religion”, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards (ed.), New York: Macmillan.
Asad, Talal, 1993, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Asad, Talal, 2001, “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith’s The Meaning and End of Religion”, History of Religions, 40(3): 205–222. doi:10.1086/463633
Asad, Talal and Craig Martin, 2014, “Genealogies of Religion, Twenty Years On: An Interview with Talal Asad”, Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 43(1): 12–17. doi:10.1558/bsor.v43i1.12
Augustine, City of God, Volume III: Books 8–11, David S. Wiesen (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.
Bambrough, Renford, 1960–1, “Universals and Family Resemblances”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 61: 207–222. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/61.1.207
Barton, Carlin A. and Daniel Boyarin, 2016, Imagine No Religion: How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities, New York: Fordham University Press.
Berger, Peter L., 1967, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, New York: Doubleday.
Berger, Peter L., 1974, “Some Second Thoughts on Substantive versus Functional Definitions of Religion”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13(2): 125–133. doi:10.2307/1384374
Biller, Peter, 1985, “Words and the Medieval Notion of ‘Religion’”, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 36(3): 351–369. 10.1017/S0022046900041142
Boyarin, Daniel, 2017, “Nominalist ‘Judaism’ and the Late-Antique Invention of Religion”, in Religion, Theory, Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches and Methodologies, Richard King (ed.), New York: Columbia University Press, ch. 2.
Boyer, Pascal, 2001, Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, New York: Basic Books.
Burley, Mikel, 2019, “‘Being Near Enough to Listen’: Wittgenstein and Interreligious Understanding”, in Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Gorazd Andrejč and Daniel H. Weiss (eds), Leiden: Brill, 33–53.
Campany, Robert Ford, 2003, “On the Very Idea of Religions (in the Modern West and Early Medieval China)”, History of Religions, 42(4): 287–319. doi:10.1086/378757
Campany, Robert Ford, 2012, “Chinese History and Writing about ‘Religion(s)’: Reflections at a Crossroads”, in Dynamics in the History of Religions between Asia and Europe: Encounters, Notions, and Comparative Perspectives, Marion Steineke and Volkhard Krech (eds), Leiden: Brill, 273–294.
Campany, Robert Ford, 2018, “‘Religious’ as a Category: A Comparative Case Study”, Numen, 65(4): 333–376. doi:10.1163/15685276-12341503
Casadio, Giovanni, 2016, “Historicizing and Translating Religion”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion, Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Muckadell, Caroline Schaffalitzky, 2014, “On Essentialism and Real Definitions of Religion”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82(2): 495–520. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfu015
Dubuisson, Daniel, 1998 [2003], L’Occident et la religion: mythes, science et idéologie, Bruxelles: Editions Complexe. Translated as The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology, William Sayers (trans.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.
Dubuisson, Daniel, 2019, The Invention of Religions, Martha Cunningham (trans.), Sheffield: Equinox. French original published as L’invention Des Religions: Impérialisme Cognitif et Violence Épistémique, Paris: CNRS éditions, 2020.
Durkheim, Emile, 1912 [1915], Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, le système totémique en Australie, Paris: F. Alcan. Translated as The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, a Study in Religious Sociology, Joseph Ward Swain (trans.), London: George Allen & Unwin, 1915.
Edwards, Rem, 1972, Reason and Religion: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanavich.
Ferro-Luzzi, Gabriella Eichinger, 1989, “The Polythetic-Prototype Approach to Hinduism”, in Hinduism Reconsidered, Günther-Dietz Sontheimer and Hermann Kulke (eds), New Delhi: Manohar, pp. 294–304.
Finley, Stephen C., Biko Mandela Gray, and Lori Latrice Martin (eds.), 2020, The Religion of White Rage: Religious Fervor, White Workers and the Myth of Black Racial Progress, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fitzgerald, Timothy, 2000, The Ideology of Religious Studies, New York: Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, Timothy, 2007, Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300093.001.0001
Fitzgerald, Timothy, 2015, “Critical Religion and Critical Research on Religion: Religion and Politics as Modern Fictions”, Critical Research on Religion, 3(3): 303–319. doi:10.1177/2050303215613123
Fitzgerald, Timothy, 2017, “The Ideology of Religious Studies Revisited: The Problem with Politics”, in Method and Theory in the Study of Religion: Working Papers from Hannover, Steffen Führding (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 124–152.
Geertz, Armin W., 2016, “Conceptions of Religion in the Cognitive Science of Religion”, in Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion, Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, and Mikael Rothstein (eds), Sheffield: Equinox, 127–139.
Geertz, Clifford, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Griffiths, Paul J., 2000, “The Very Idea of Religion”, First Things, 103(May): 30–35. [Griffiths 2000 available online]
Haidt, Jonathan, 2012, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York: Vintage.
Hanegraaff, Wouter J., 1995, “Empirical Method in the Study of Esotericism”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 7(2): 99–129.
Harrison, Peter, 1990, ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627972
Hick, John, 1989, An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hick, John, 1989, 1993, Disputed Questions in Theology and the Philosophy of Religion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
James, William, 1902 [1985], The Varieties of Religious Experience, London: Longmans, Green, and Co.; reprinted, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
James, William, 1912 [1979], The Will to Believe, London: Longmans, Green, and Co.; reprinted, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Kant, Immanuel, 1793 [1934], Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, Königsberg. Translated as Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson (trans.), La Salle, IL: The Open Court, 1934.
Laurence, Stephen and Eric Margolis, 1999, “Concepts and Cognitive Science”, in Concepts: Core Readings, Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence (eds), Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–81.
Lehrich, Christopher I., 2021, Jonathan Z. Smith on Religion, London: Routledge.
Lincoln, Bruce, 2006, Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11. Second edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ling, Trevor, 1980, Karl Marx and Religion: In Europe and India, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lofton, Kathryn, 2011, Oprah: The Gospel of an Icon, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lofton, Kathryn, 2012, “Religious History as Religious Studies”, Religion, 42(3): 383–394. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2012.681878
Lopez, Donald S., Jr., 1998, “Belief”, in Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Mark C. Taylor (ed), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lovric, Bruno, 2020, “Pokémon Fandom as a Religion: Construction of Identity and Cultural Consumption in Hong Kong”, in Handbook of Research on the Impact of Fandom in Society and Consumerism, Cheng Lu Wang (ed.), Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 460–479.
Luther, Martin, 1526 [1973], Der Prophet Jonah, Nuremberg. Translated in Lectures on the Minor Prophets, Volume II, Hilton Oswald (ed.), (Luther’s Works, 19), Saint Louis, MO: Concordia.
Marett, Robert Ranulph, 1909, The Threshold of Religion, London: Methuen and Co.
Martin, Craig, 2009, “Delimiting Religion”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 21(2): 157–176. doi:10.1163/157006809X431015
Mason, Steve, 2019, “Our Language and Theirs: ‘Religious’ Categories and Identities”, in Roubekas 2019: 11–31.
Masuzawa, Tomoko, 2005, The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCarraher, Eugene, 2019, The Enchantments of Mammon: How Capitalism Became the Religion of Modernity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCutcheon, Russell T., 1997, Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia, New York: Oxford University Press.
McCutcheon, Russell T., 2018, Fabricating Religion: Fanfare for the Common e.g., Berlin: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110560831
McCutcheon, Russell, and Arnal, William, 2012, The Sacred is the Profane: The Political Nature of “Religion”, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757114.001.0001
McWhorter, John, 2021, Woke Racism: How a New Religion has Betrayed Black America, New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Needham, Rodney, 1975, “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences”, Man, New Series 10(3): 349–369. doi:10.2307/2799807
Nongbri, Brent, 2013, Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nongbri, Brent, 2019, “Introduction: The Present and Future of Ancient Religion”, in Roubekas 2019: 1–8.
Omer, Atalia and Jason A. Springs, 2013, Religious Nationalism: A Reference Handbook, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Platvoet, J. G., 1982, Comparing Religions: A Limitative Approach, The Hague: Mouton.
Possamai, Adam, 2018, The i-zation of Society, Religion, and Neoliberal Post-Secularization, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5942-1
Proudfoot, Wayne, 1985, Religious Experience, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Proudfoot, Wayne, 2000, “William James on an Unseen Order”, Harvard Theological Review, 93(1): 51–66. doi:10.1017/S0017816000016667
Riesebrodt, Martin, 2007 [2010], Cultus und Heilsversprechen: eine Theorie der Religionen, München : Verlag C.H. Beck. Translated as The Promise of Salvation: A Theory of Religion, Steven Rendall (trans.), Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Roubekas, Nickolas P. (ed.), 2019, Theorizing “Religion” in Antiquity, (Studies in Ancient Religion and Culture), Bristol, UK: Equinox Publishing.
Saler, Benson, 1977, “Supernatural as a Western Category”, Ethos, 5(1): 31–53. doi:10.1525/eth.1977.5.1.02a00040
Saler, Benson, 1993, Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Saler, Benson, 1999, “Family Resemblance and the Definition of Religion”, Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques, 25(3): 391–404.
Saler, Benson, 2021, The Construction of the Supernatural in Euro-American Cultures: Something Nice about Vampires, London: Bloomsbury.
Schaefer, Donovan O., 2015, Religious Affects: Animals, Evolution, and Power, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Schellenberg, J. L., 2005, Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schilbrack, Kevin, 2013, “What Isn’t Religion?”, Journal of Religion, 93(3): 291–318. doi:10.1086/670276
Schilbrack, Kevin, 2018, “Mathematics and the Definitions of Religion”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 83(2): 145–160. doi:10.1007/s11153-017-9621-6
Schilbrack, Kevin, 2021, “Religious Practices and the Formation of Subjects”, in The Future of the Philosophy of Religion, M. David Eckel, C. Allen Speight, and Troy DuJardin (eds), (Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life 8), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 43–60. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44606-2_4
Smart, Ninian, 1996, Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Smith, Christian, 2017, Religion: What it is, How it Works, and Why it Matters, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, John E., 1994, Quasi-religions: Humanism, Marxism, and Nationalism, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Smith, Jonathan Z., 1978, Map is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions, Leiden: Brill.
Smith, Jonathan Z., 1982, Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Jonathan Z., 1995, “Afterword: Religious Studies: Whither (Wither) and Why?”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 7(4): 407–414. doi:10.1163/157006895X00171
Smith, Jonathan Z., 1998, “Religion, Religions, Religious”, Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Mark C. Taylor (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, 1962, The Meaning and End of Religion, New York: Macmillan.
Southwold, Martin, 1978, “Buddhism and the Definition of Religion”, Man, New Series 13(3): 362–379. doi:10.2307/2801935
Spiro, Melford, 1966, “Religion: Problems of Definition and Explanation”, in Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, Michael Banton (ed.), London: Tavistock, 85–126.
Taves, Ann, 2009, Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and other Special Things., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tillich, Paul, 1957, Dynamics of Faith, New York: Harper and Row.
Tillich, Paul, 1963, Christianity and the Encounter of the World Religions, New York: Columbia University Press.
Turner, Bryan S., 2011, Religion and Modern Society: Citizenship, Secularization and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511975660
Tylor, Edward Burnett, 1871 [1970], Primitive Culture, two vols., London: John Murray, 1871; vol. 2 reprinted as Religion in Primitive Culture, Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1970.
Vásquez, Manuel A., 2011, More than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weed, Eric, 2019, The Religion of White Supremacy in the United States, Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Whitehead, Alfred North, 1926, Religion in the Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, Timothy, 1994, Vagueness, London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953 [2009], Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Armstrong (trans.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell; reprinted: 4th edition, Malden: Blackwell, 2009.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1974, Philosophical Grammar, Anthony Kenny (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.