Social marketing for sustainability transitions: integrating behaviour change frameworks with transition management

Authors

  • Lukas Vartiak Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9735-5945
  • Katarina Rentkova Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Management
  • Ludmila Mitkova Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Management
  • Martina Chrancokova Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute for Forecasting https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-2175

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2026v17i1p67-79

Keywords:

Social marketing, Sustainability, Behaviour change, Sustainability transitions, Stakeholder engagement, Systems thinking

Abstract

Sustainability has emerged as a defining challenge for contemporary societies, requiring not only technological innovation and policy reform but also profound changes in everyday behaviours, organisational routines, and social norms. The primary objective of the paper is to develop and justify a conceptual framework that embeds social marketing within sustainability strategies. Drawing on an integrative systematic literature review and conceptual synthesis across social marketing, behaviour change science, and sustainability transitions, the paper proposes a three-dimensional framework comprising: (1) behavioural diagnosis and audience segmentation, (2) value co-creation and stakeholder engagement, and (3) feedback and systemic reinforcement. The framework is designed to explain how pro-sustainable behaviours can be adopted, maintained, and scaled in ways that support longer-term socio-technical transitions. The results synthesise evidence showing that sustainability-oriented interventions are most effective when they move beyond generic awareness-raising and instead address heterogeneous behavioural barriers, involve stakeholders in co-design processes, and create reinforcing feedback loops aligned with infrastructures, institutions, and social norms. Behavioural diagnosis enables targeted intervention design by recognising differences in motivation, capability, opportunity, and social context. Value co-creation enhances relevance, legitimacy, and equity by engaging employees, communities, and cross-sector partners in shaping solutions. Feedback and systemic reinforcement support long-term maintenance by making outcomes visible, leveraging social influence, and embedding behaviours within supportive policy and service environments. The paper contributes theoretically by linking micro-level behaviour change mechanisms with meso- and macro-level sustainability transition dynamics. Practically, it offers organisations and policy actors a structured blueprint for operationalising sustainability goals through social marketing as a strategic capability rather than a communication tool. The article concludes by outlining directions for future empirical research to test the framework across industries, cultural contexts, and sustainability domains, with particular attention to scalability, ethics, and long-term impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Andreasen, A. R. (1994). Social marketing: Its definition and domain. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569401300109

Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.3.17602

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Domegan, C., McHugh, P., Devaney, M., Duane, S., Hogan, M., Broome, B. J., & Layton, R. A. (2016). Systems-thinking social marketing: Conceptual extensions and empirical investigations. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(11–12), 1123–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1183697

Flaherty, T., Domegan, C., Duane, S., Brychkov, D., & Anand, M. (2020). Systems social marketing and macro-social marketing: A systematic review. Social Marketing Quarterly, 26(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500420925188

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Gordon, R. (2011). Critical social marketing: Definition, application and domain. Journal of Social Marketing, 1(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111141850

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

Kopac, L., Triebel, B., Romano Berner, M., & Volkmann, U. (2025). Critical thinking in education: cross-cultural perspectives and analysis of aggregated PISA indicators. Revista on Line De Política E Gestão Educacional, 29(esp4), e025104. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp4.20775

Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297103500302

Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x

Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). New Society Publishers.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2009). Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.033

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Truong, V. D. (2014). Social marketing: A systematic review of research 1998–2012. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413517666

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Vrablikova, M., Ubreziova, I., Kubickova, M., & Skodova, L. (2024). Sustainable clothing buying behavior of Generations X and Y. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(3), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.3-12

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649

649

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30