The employability of refugees and migrants
knowledge from outside for development from within
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1982-4807.2019i25p44-56Keywords:
refugees, local integration, employabilityAbstract
The unprecedented forced displacement of people in different parts of the world has impacted different host societies in their political, economic, social, cultural and legal aspects. On the one hand, the receiving States endeavor to improve emergency responses in a systemic manner due to the prolongation of instabilities in the countries of origin, on the other hand the potential for local integration opens up to displaced populations, when done well, have positive effects for the local development as a whole. In the search, the immediate need for income generation in the context of humanitarian emergencies often overlaps with the construction and consolidation of solid public policies that would ensure better results through the long-term integration bias, reconciling the knowledge and experiences of those who arrive to contribute effectively for the development of the host societies. To this end, institutional articulation between the public and private sectors, mediated by humanitarian agencies and with the support of the civil society, would facilitate the promotion of effective mechanisms for local integration of this population as, with access to formal work and facilitation for entrepreneurship, the local economy becomes more dynamic and corporate results even more efficient, reducing vulnerability and transforming distrust into common earnings.Downloads
Metrics
References
ADAMSON, Fiona (2006). Crossing borders: international migration and national security. International Security, Vol. 31, n.1, pp. 165-199. The MIT Press.
ACNUR - Alto Comissariado das Nações Unidas para Refugiados. (2020). Global trends: forced displacement in 2019. UNHCR.
ANDERSON, Malcolm; DEN BOER, Monica (1994). Policing across national boundaries. London: Pinter.ANDREAS, Peter; SNYDER, Timothy (2000). The wall around the west: state borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
BIGO, Didier (1997). Security, borders and the state. In GANSTER, Paul; SWEEDLER, Alan; SCOTT, James e DIETER-EBERWEIN, Wolf. Borders and border regions in Europe and North America. San Diego: San Diego University Press, p. 81-104.
BLACK, Richard (2001). Fifty years of refugee studies: from theory to policy. Center for Migration Studies of New York. Sussex: University of Sussex.
CHATTY, Dawn e MARFLEET, Philip (2013). Conceptual problems in forced migration. Refugee Survey Quarterly, Vol. 32, N.2, pp. 1–13. Oxford: Oxford Press.
CHIMNI, Bhupinder (1999). From resettlement to involuntary repatriation: towards a critical history of durable solutions to refugee. Nova Deli: Jawaharlal Nehru University.
CHIMNI, Bhupinder. (2009). The Birth of a Discipline: From Refugee to Forced Migration Studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, n. 22.
GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN, Thomas (2014). International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy: The Case of Deterrence Policies. Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 27, n. 4.
GATRELL, Peter (2015). The Making of the Modern Refugee. New York: Oxford University Press.
HADDAD, Emma (2008). The refugee in international society: between sovereigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KRASNER, Stephen (1999). Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
KIRSHNER, Jonathan (2006). Ed. Globalization and National Security. New York: Routledge.
MANN, Itamar (2013). Dialectic of Transnationalism: unauthorized Migration and Human Rights. Harvard International Law Journal, 54(2): 315-391.
MATAS, David (2001). Refugee Determination Complexity. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, n.19.
MCKINSEY & COMPANY (2020). Diversity wins: how inclusion matters. Disponível em https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-wins--how-inclusion-matters. Acesso em 04/10/2020.
Organização Internacional para as Migrações – OIM (2019). Monitoramento de fluxo populacional venezuelano no Brasil DTM. Rodada 5. Disponível em: https://displacement.iom.int/system/tdf/reports/27.01.2020%20OIM%20Brasil-%20DTM%20Rodada%205.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=7750. Acesso em 04/10/2020.
REACH initative (2019). A resposta humanitária no Brasil: uma análise sobre a estratégia de interiorização. Disponível em: https://www.acnur.org/portugues/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/REACH_Relat%C3%B3rio-de-Interioriza%C3%A7%C3%A3o_-FINAL_PORTUGUESE.pdf. Acesso em 03/10/2020.
SHIERHOLZ, Heide (2010). Immigration and wages: methodological advancements confirm modest gains for native workers. Economic Policy Institute. Briefing Paper.
WOOD, Geof (1985). The politics of development policy labelling. London: Sage.
ZETTER, Roger (1988). Refugees and refugee studies: a label and an agenda. Journal of Refuges Studies. v. 1, n. 1. Oxford: Oxford Press.
ZETTER, Roger (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: remaking the refugee Label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies 20: 172-192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ponto-e-Vírgula : Revista de Ciências Sociais

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.


