The “seats” institute and the legal function of the Supreme Courts, by A. Castanheira Neves

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/ddem.v0i2.51371

Keywords:

Overviews, Binding Summary, Supreme Courts

Abstract

There are dead who are resurrected, as the work deals with the existing problem regarding the unconstitutionality of overviews’ Portuguese, and the theme resurfaces as the institute resurges, with the new garment entitled binding summary, despite the existence of criticisms in opposite winds

Author Biography

Luciana Paggiatto, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC-SP, São Paulo, SP

CNPq fellow. PhD student in Civil Procedural Law at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo - Concentration Area: Effectiveness of Law; Line of Research: Effectiveness of Private Law and Civil Liberties; Research Project: Cognition as a means of settling the contentious material law. Master in Civil Procedural Law from PUC / SP [2015] - CAPES Scholarship. Postgraduate with specialization in Civil Procedural Law from PUC-SP. I was Coordinator of strategic matters, as well as civil, labor and tax litigation at Valfredo Bessa Advogados. Practice in the areas of Tax Law, Civil Administrative, Family, Banking, Environmental, Consumer and Telecommunications. He worked in renowned law firms, among them Advocacia Salomone, Sette Câmara, Corrêa e Bastos Advogados Associados, De Vivo, Whitaker e Castro Advogados Associados, Leite, Tosto e Barros Advogados, contract law, consumer law, corporate law, real estate development, banking and telecommunications. She was an assistant professor in Civil Procedural Law at Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU and Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, undergraduate and graduate studies.

References

CASTANHEIRA NEVES, A. O instituto dos “assentos” e a função juridica dos Supremos Tribunais. 1o Edição ed. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2014; p. 679

Published

2021-06-30