Due constitutional and conventional legal process:

necessary dialogue for the democratic rule of law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.4.57468

Keywords:

Democratic state, Due Legal Process, Constitutionality Control, Conventionality Control, Judicial power

Abstract

The effectiveness of a process due to the restrictive actions of the States is one of the great themes under discussion nowadays. However, in Latin America and, especially in Brazil, there is resistance to the due effectiveness of these guarantees. The weakest democracies have a conservative authoritarian tradition that insists on evading constitutional guarantees recognized on the international stage. Conventional due process in support of the constitutional is a necessary alternative for the paradigm shift in Brazil and in Latin America as a whole. Through the inductive analytical method, this tool was used to observe and analyze its application in the socio-historical and cultural context of the Western world, mainly, aiming at the constitutional observation of fundamental and human rights in Brazil as a paradigm.

 

Author Biographies

Aldo Botana Menezes, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas de Extrema, Extrema, MG

Post-Doctor in Law from the University of Coimbra - Ius Gentium Conimbrigae / Center for Human Rights (IGC). Doctor in Social Sciences from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC/SP). Master in Philosophy from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC/SP). Specialist in Procedural Law (UMC/SP). Graduated in Law from the University of Mogi das Cruzes (UMC/SP). Graduated in Social Sciences from Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL/SP). Researcher in Public Law and Philosophy of Law, with emphasis on the following topics: Legal Post-Positivism, Public Policies, Citizenship, Human Rights, Technologies of Power and Liquid Modernity. University Professor and Lawyer at V.S.S. - Lawyer Society. Academic Coordinator of the Specialization Course in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedural Law at Escola Superior da Advocacia - Subsection of Mogi das Cruzes - SP. Professor at the Faculty of Applied Sciences of Extrema - MG. Content teacher with experience in the development of exclusive teaching material for Distance Learning Institutions in the areas of Human Rights, Criminal Law, Administrative Law, Philosophy and Sociology. He currently coordinates the Research Group of the Faculty of Law at FACULDADE DE SUZANO-Research Line: Democratic State of Law and the realization of Fundamental Rights

Luciano Morgado Guarnieri, Faculdade de Direito de Extrema - FAEX, Extrema, MG

Master's student in Philosophy of Law at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo - PUC-SP, specialist in Human Rights and access to justice at FGVLaw in São Paulo. He is currently a public defender working in the criminal area, Jury Court, Special Criminal Courts, infractions in childhood and youth and criminal execution - Public Defender's Office of the State of Minas Gerais. He has experience in the field of law, with an emphasis on human rights and citizenship. Currently, he teaches the subjects of Introduction to the Study of Law, General Part Criminal Law and Special Part I, Constitutional Actions and Criminal Practice I, at the Faculty of Law of Extrema-MG (FAEX).

References

ARCARO CONCI, Luiz Guilherme. Mercorur, Integration Regional Y Derechos Humanos en un Proceso Multinivel, Estudios constitucionales [online]. 2015, vol.13, n.2, pp.125-152. ISSN 0718-5200. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002015000200005.

BERTOLINO, Pedro. El Debido Processo Penal. Editora La Plata. 1986.

CANOTILHO, JJ Gomes. Direito Constitucional e Teoria da Constituição. Almedina .2018. Lisboa, página 123.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Direito e Razão Teoria do Garantismo Penal. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2002.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Garantismo :uma discussão sobre direito e democracia. Editora Lumen Juris, 2012.

GARCEZ RAMOS, João Gualberto. Evolução Histórica do Princípio do Devido Processo Legal, In Revista da UFPR, Curitiba, 2007.

GIACOMOLLI, Nereu José. O devido Processo Legal. Editora Atlas. São Paulo. 2014.

GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen. Autoritarismo e processo penal: Uma genealogia das ideias autoritárias no processo penal brasileiro. Editora Tirant Lo Blanch, 2018.

LLOBET RODRIGUEZ, Javier. La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y las garantias Penales, Editora Ulpiano, 2019.

LOPES JR, Auri. Fundamentos do Processo Penal - Introdução crítica, Saraiva Jur. 2019.

MAZZUOLI, Valério de Oliveira. O controle jurisdicional da convencionalidade das leis. Revista dos Tribunais; São Paulo, 2011.

MORIN, Edgar. Ensinando a Transgredir – A educação como prática da liberdade. Editora bell Hooks. 2008.

PARLAMENTO EUROPEU. DIRETIIVA (UE) 2016/343 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho – 09 de março de 2016 – relativa ao reforço de certos aspectos da presunção de inocência e do direito de comparecer em julgamento em processo penal (europa.eu). Acesso em 21/04/2021.

PROCESSO ELETRÔNICO: MS 31667 AgR, Relator: Dias Tóffoli, Segunda Turma, julgado em 11/09/2018, processo eletrônico DJE-250 DIVULG 22-11-2018 PUBLIC 23-11-2018.

PROCESSO ELETRÔNICO: STJ. AgRg no AREsp 1373849/PR, Rel. Ministro Joel Ilan Paciornik, Quinta Turma, julgado em 19/11/2019, DJe 28/11/2019, disponível em https://scon.stj.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num registro=201802579429&dt publicação=28/11/2019. Acesso 31/01/2021.;

ROSSI, Jorge Vasquez. El debido Processo em la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Intaremericana de Derechos Humanos, 2017

SILVA, Marco Antonio Marques da. Acesso à justiça penal e Estado Democrático de Direito. Editora Juarez de Oliveira, 2001.

STRECK, Lenio. Dicionário de Hermenêutica. Editora Casa do Direito. Belo Horizonte. 2018.

Published

2022-05-31