Responsabilidade Civil em Contratos Inteligentes: Desafios para a definição de responsáveis em caso de falhas técnicas

Wellington Jose Campos

doi:10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.13.68665

Authors

Wellington Jose Campos Faculdades Milton Campos - FMC, Belo Horizonte, MG https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9159-2931

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.13.68665

Keywords:

Civil liability, Smart contracts, Technical failures, Coding security, Digital legislation

Abstract

This article addresses civil liability in smart contracts, highlighting the challenges that arise from technical failures or coding errors. Using the inductive method and an analysis of up-to-date literature, the study explores the differences between traditional concepts of civil liability and the new challenges posed by smart contract technology. The research is based on theories of civil liability, particularly those that discuss faults and risk, adapting them to the digital context. The article seeks to answer two central questions: (1) How does the immutability of smart contracts affect the possibility of damage reparations in the event of technical failures? (2) What technological and legal mechanisms can be implemented to prevent technical failures in smart contracts, and how can these mechanisms be integrated into existing legislation? To address these issues, the study proposes the creation of new legal models that include guidelines to ensure secure coding, shared responsibility between developers and platforms, and the introduction of specific mechanisms for conflict resolution. The conclusion is that current legislation is insufficient to adequately address the particularities of smart contracts, especially regarding the definition of liability in the event of technical failures.

Author Biography

Wellington Jose Campos, Faculdades Milton Campos - FMC, Belo Horizonte, MG

Master in Economic and Social Relations Law from Faculdades Milton Campos. Graduated in Law from Centro Universitário Metodista Izabela Hendrix. Specialist in Information Technology Management. Specialist in History and Political Cultures from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2008). Bachelor's and Licentiate's Degree in History from Faculdade ASA de Brumadinho (2006). Currently dedicated to legal research with interfaces with computer science. Holds debates in the Theory and History of Law, with studies on Hanna Arendt and Carl Shimtt and Military Dictatorship in Brazil. Member of the research group: Digitalization, artificial intelligence and legal research in times of pandemic (DGP/CNPq), from Faculdades Milton Campos, led by Carlos Alberto Rohrmann. Member of the Interdisciplinary Center for Law and Culture (NIDC) - Advanced Studies Workshop Axis: Law Course at Faculdades Milton Campos - Member of the Study Group on Herman Dooyeweerd at the Federal University of Minas Gerais.

References

AL HAMRANI, N. R.; AL HAMRANI, A. R. (2021). A blockchain and smart contract-based recruitment model for people of determination (disabilities). Technology and Investment, 12, 136-150. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2021.123008.

ALLEN, J. G.; HUNN, P. (2022). Smart Legal Contracts: Computable Law in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.

ARNER, D. W., BARBERIS, J.; BUCKLEY, R. P. (2019). The evolution of fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47, 1271-1319.

ATZEI, N., BARTOLETTI, M.; CIMOLI, T. (2017). A survey of attacks on Ethereum smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust (pp. 164-186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_8.

CLACK, C. D., BAKSHI, V. A.; BRAINE, L. (2016). Smart contract templates: Foundations, design landscape, and research directions.

CORRALES, M., FENWICK, M.; HAAPIO, H. (2019). Legal Tech, Smart Contracts, and Blockchain, Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer.

DE FILIPPI, P.; WRIGHT, A. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press.

FILIPPI, D., PRIMAVERA; HASSAN, S. (2017). Blockchain's legal implications: How blockchains enable self-executing contracts. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 30, 723-773.

FILIPPI, P. D.; WRIGHT, A. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press.

FINCK, M. (2019). Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609708.

FRANKENREITER, J. (2019). The limits of smart contracts. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 175, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2019-0021

GARY, M. (2006). Software Security: Building Security. In. Addison-Wesley Professional.

GOLDSMITH, J.; WU, T. (2006). Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press.

GRIMMELMANN, J. (2018). All smart contracts are ambiguous. Penn Journal of Law & Innovation, 2, 1-22.

HIRSCHFIELD, D.; DURIC, M. (2022). Part Two: Why English law is the smart choice for governing smart contracts? https://www.taylorwessing.com/en/insights-and-events/insights/2022/03/why-is-english-law-the-smart-choice-for-governing-smart-contacts acesso em 01 de agosto de 2024.

LEVY, K. E. C. (2017). Book-smart, not street-smart: Blockchain-based smart contracts and the social workings of law. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.107

MIDDLEBROOK, S. T.; HUGHES, S. D. (2016). Regulating cryptocurrencies in the United States: Current issues and future directions. William Mitchell Law Review, 40, 813-847.

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (NCSL). (2022). Electronic Transactions Laws.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (PwC). (2021). Blockchain and Smart Contracts: Auditing the Decentralized Finance Ecosystem.

REINERS, B. (2019). The good, the bad, and the ugly of smart contracts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27, 1-18.

ROBERT, B., COOTER JR.; ULEN, T. (2011). Law and Economics. Prentice Hall.

SALHA, R. A., EL-HALLAQ, M. A.; ALASTAL, A. I. (2019). Blockchain in smart cities: Exploring possibilities in terms of opportunities and challenges. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 7, 118-139. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2019.73008

SCOTT, R. E.; KRAUS, J. S. (2013). Contract Law and Theory. LexisNexis.

SWAN, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O'Reilly.

SZABO, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548

TAPSCOTT, D.; TAPSCOTT, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies Is Changing the World. Portfolio.

UNITED KINGDOM, LAW COMMISSION. (2022). The Law Commission Annual Report 2021-22: The Fifty-Sixth Annual Report of the Law Commission. Stationery Office.

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL). Texts on Electronic Communication and Smart Contracts. https://uncitral.un.org: acesso em 08 de agosto de 2024

WANG, Z. J. (2019). Between constancy and change: Legal practice and legal education in the age of technology. Law in Context, 36, 64-79. https://doi.org/10.26826/law-in-context.v36i1.87.

WERBACH, K. (2018). The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust, Information Policy Series. MIT Press.