The multiple temporalities of infrastructure
atomic cities and the memory of lost futures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1982-6672.2022v15i45p117-134Keywords:
Anthropocene, nuclear power plants, atomic city, myth of progressAbstract
Nuclear power plants, with their promise of boundless cheap energy, are archetypal figures of progress modernity. As we acknowledge the limits of industrial progress and growth-based capital, places for where the dream is now over, and whose inhabitants are finding ways of living through its transition, offer emergent practical ontologies based on maintenance, bricolage and necessity. Through the case study of the atomic city of Visaginas, Lithuania, this paper addresses the question of how to account for forms of life that emerge in the aftermath of high modernity. Here, infrastructures operate as residual cultural and material resources for practical ontologies and world building after progress. Building on emerging scholarship on the political aesthetics of infrastructure, I suggest that their ontological transition involves what Fisher describes as the ‘memory of lost futures’, a future anterior that, through the remains of material connections, technocultures and cultural memory, provide limits and conditions for emergent ways of living ‘after progress.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ANAND, N. A public matter: Water, hydraulics, biopolitics. In: ANAND, N.; GUPTA, A. and APPEL, H. (eds). The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2018, p. 155–172.
BALOCKAITE, R. Coping with the unwanted past in planned socialist towns: Visaginas, Tychy, and Nowa Huta. Slovo, 2012, 24: 41–60.
BAUBINAS, R. and BURNEIKA, D. Social Consequences of Closing the Ignalina NPP. Geografija, 2001, 37: 69–75.
BERLANT, L. (2016) The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2016, 34: 393–419.
BERMAN, M. All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Brooklyn, NY, Verso, 1983. [Tudo que é sólido desmancha no ar, trad. bras. Carlos Felipe Moisés e Ana Maria L. Ioriatti. São Paulo, Companhia de Bolso, 2007.]
BROWN, K. L. Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters. New York, Oxford University Press, 2013.
DAWNEY, L. Figurationing. In: UPRICHARD, E.; LURY, C; FENSHAM, R. et al. (eds). Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods. London, Routledge, 2018.
DAWNEY, L. Decommissioned places: Ruins, endurance and care at the end of the first nuclear age. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2020a.
DAWNEY, L. Dramatising deindustrialisation. In: PRICE, W.; Rhodes, M. and WALKER, A. (eds). Geographies of Post-Industrial Memory, Place, and Heritage. London, Routledge, 2020b.
FISHER, M. Ghosts of my Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures. Winchester, UK, John Hunt Publishing, 2014. [Fantasmas da minha vida: Escritos sobre depressão, assombrologia e futuros perdidos, trad. bras. Guilherme Ziggy. São Paulo, Autonomia Literária, 2022].
HARVEY, P. and KNOX, H. The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities, 2012, 7: 521–536.
HECHT, G. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2012.
HETHERINGTON, K. Surveying the future perfect: Anthropology, development and the promise of infrastructure. In: Infrastructures and Social Complexity. London: Routledge, 2016, p. 58–68.
JENSEN, C. B. and MORITA, A. Introduction: Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Ethnos, 2017, 82: 615–626.
JONES, B. M. (Com)Post-capitalism: Cultivating a more-than-human economy in the Appalachian Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 2019, 11: 3–26.
KIRKSEY, S. E.; SHAPIRO, N. and BRODINE, M. Hope in blasted landscapes. Social Science Information, 2013, 52: 228–256.
KOHN, M. Dreamworlds of deindustrialization. Theory & Event, 2009, 12.
LARKIN, B. The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2013, 42: 327–343.
LARKIN, B. Promising forms: the political aesthetics of infrastructure. In: ANAND, N.; GUPTA, A. and APPEL, H. (eds). The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham, Duke University Press, 2018, p. 175–202.
MASCO, J. The Theater of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Durham, Duke University Press, 2014.
PAPADOPOULOS, D. Experimental Practice: Technoscience, Alterontologies, and More-than-Social Movements. Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2018.
PITKANEN, L. and FARISH, M. Nuclear landscapes. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42: 862–880.
RINGEL, F. Post-industrial times and the unexpected: Endurance and sustainability in Germany’s fastest-shrinking city. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2014, 20: 52–70.
RINGEL, F. The production of indeterminacy: On the unforseeable futures of postindustrial excess. In: ALEXANDER, C. and SANCHEZ, A. (eds). Indeterminacy: Waste, Value, and the Imagination. Oxford, Berghahn, 2018, p. 68–88.
ROBBINS, J. Beyond the suffering subject: Toward an anthropology of the good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2013, 19: 447–462.
SCHWENKEL, C. (2018) The current never stops: Intimacies of energy infrastructure in Vietnam. In: ANAND, N.; GUPTA, A. and APPEL, H. (eds). The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2018, p. 102–129.
ŠLIAVAITĖ, K. ‘Homeland is where everything is for the people’: The rationale of belonging and _ citizenship in the context of social uncertainty. In: KNUDSEN, I. H. and FREDERIKSEN, M. D. (eds). Ethnographies of Grey Zones in Eastern Europe: Relations, Borders and Invisibilities. New York, Anthem Press, 2015, p. 107–122.
TSING, A. L.; BUBANDT, N; GAN, E. et al. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aurora. Journal of Art, Media and Politics.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
