Formação de sentido em charges políticas de extrema direita
uma análise à luz dos estudos da linguagem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1982-6672.2024v17i49p29-49Abstract
This paper investigates the formation of meaning in Jota Camelo's cartoons, using the analytical tool of Conceptual Integration (FAUCONNIER; TURNER, 2002), together with the concepts of frame (FILLMORE, 1976) and moral frame (LAKOFF, 2004). The analysis focuses on the humor generated by the integration of concepts to form complex conceptual entities conveyed by language. Adopting a qualitative approach (SILVERMAN, 2000; GIL, 1991) and influenced by Ginzburg's (1989) venatory methodology, we seek to identify patterns in the processes of integration of concepts for the formation of meaning, which leads to humor. The object of research is the meaning-making operations in cartoons, which leads to the understanding of the creation and interpretation of humor in satirical contexts, especially in far-right cartoons.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ATTARDO, Salvatore. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor. Routledge, 2017.
________. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Reprint 2010, De Gruyter Mouton, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail. Esthétique de La Création Verbale. Gallimard, 1984.
FAUCONNIER, Gilles. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.
________. Creativity, simulation, and conceptualization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v.22, n.4, p.615-615, 1999.
FAUCONNIER, Gilles; TURNER, Mark. The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
FELINTO, Erick. Me parecer verdadeiro pelo contexto Olavo de Carvalho, Conspiracionismo e a Desinformação como Programa político. Revista Eco-Pós, v.26, n.01, p.12–30. 2023. https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-ps.v26i01.28143.
FILLMORE, Charles. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In: HARNARD, Steven R.; STEKLIS, Horst D.; LANCASTER, Jane. (eds.) Origins and evolution of language and speech. Nova York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.
GINZBURG, Carlo. Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário. In: ______. Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989. p.143-179.
LAKOFF, George. Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Pub. Co, 2004.
________. Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals In the Dust. Social Research, vol. 62, n. 2, p. 177–213, 1995.
________. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Third edition, The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
________. The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. Viking, 2008.
MORREALL, John, editor. The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. State University of New York Press, 1987.
SILVERMAN, David. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: Sage Publications, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aurora. Journal of Art, Media and Politics.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
