A anomalia persiste

revisitando algumas objeções ao monismo anômalo

Autores

  • Marcelo Fischborn Instituto Federal Farroupilha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2024v25i1:e65267

Palavras-chave:

monismo anômalo, filosofia da mente, anomaly of the mental

Resumo

O monismo anômalo de Donald Davidson foi criticado repetidas vezes desde sua defesa inaugural no artigo Mental Events, publicado em 1970. Apesar da ampla rejeição, não parece haver acordo sobre por que o monismo anômalo falha. Este artigo sistematiza duas objeções fortes ao monismo anômalo. Primeiramente, o argumento de Davidson a favor do monismo exige a suposição problemática de que a física possa fornecer leis causais estritas para relações causais em geral. Em segundo lugar, o monismo de Davidson exige uma ontologia de eventos para a qual nenhum critério de identidade satisfatório foi fornecido. Apesar desses problemas, o artigo defende que as teses sobre a anomalia e irredutibilidade do mental permanecem aceitáveis, apesar da dificuldade de se reconstruir com precisão os argumentos que Davidson usa para defendê-las.

Metrics

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

ANTONY, M. Davidson’s Argument for Monism. Synthese, v. 135, n. 1, p. 1-12, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986117864

ARMSTRONG, D. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

BOURGET, D.; CHALMERS, D. What do philosophers believe?. Philosophical Studies, v. 170, p. 465-500, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7

BURGE, T. Essays on Actions and Events, by Donald Davidson. Ethics, v. 93, n. 3, p. 608-611, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1086/292477

CAMPBELL, N. Causes and Causal Explanations: Davidson and his Critics. Philosophia, v. 31, p. 149-157, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380929

CANFIELD, J.; LEHRER, K. A Note on Prediction and Deduction. Philosophy of Science, v. 28, p. 204-208, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1086/287800

CARTWRIGHT, N. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

CRANE, T. The Mental Causation Debate. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 69, p. 211-236, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/69.1.211

DAVIDSON, D. Causal relations [1967a]. In: DAVIDSON, D. Essays on Actions and Events. 2 ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. p. 149-162.

DAVIDSON, D. Laws and Cause. Dialectica, v. 49, n. 2-4, p. 263-279, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1995.tb00165.x

DAVIDSON, D. Mental Events [1970]. In: DAVIDSON, D. Essays on Actions and Events. 2 ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. p. 207-225.

DAVIDSON, D. Reply to Quine on Events [1985]. In: DAVIDSON, D. Essays on Actions and Events. 2 ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, p. 305-311.

DAVIDSON, D. The Individuation of Events [1969]. In: DAVIDSON, D. Essays on Actions and Events. 2 ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. p. 163-180.

DAVIDSON, D. Thinking Causes. In: HEIL, J.; MELE, A. (eds.). Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. p. 3-17.

DESCARTES, R.; ELISABETH. The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. (Edited and Translated by L. Shapiro). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

DOMHOFF, G. The Scientific Study of Dreams: Neural Networks, Cognitive Development, and Content Analysis. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2003.

FISCHBORN, M. Libet-style experiments, neuroscience, and libertarian free will. Philosophical Psychology, v. 29, n. 4, p. 494-502, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1141399

FODOR, J. Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. Synthese, v. 28, p. 97-115, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485230

FODOR, J. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.

GIBB, S. Why Davidson is not a Property Epiphenomenalist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, v. 14, p. 407-422, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550600858346

GOLDBLUM, N. The Brain-Shaped Mind: What the Brain can Tell us About the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

HARBECKE, J. On the Distinction Between Law Schemata and Causal Laws. Acta Analytica, v. 28, n. 4, p. 423-434, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-013-0185-5

HEIL, J. Anomalous Monism. In: DYKE, H. (org.). From Truth to Reality: New Essays in Metaphysics. London: Routledge, 2008. p. 85-98.

HEIL, J.; MELE, A. (orgs.). Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

HONDERICH, T. The Argument for Anomalous Monism. Analysis, v. 42, p. 59-64, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/42.1.59

HORNSBY, J. Which Physical Events are Mental Events? Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society, v. 81, p. 73-92, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/81.1.73

JOHNSTON, M. Why Having a Mind Matters. In: LEPORE, E; MCLAUGHLIN, B. (orgs.). Actions and events: perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. New York: Blackwell, 1985. p. 408-426.

KIM, J. Can Supervenience and “Non-Strict Laws” Save Anomalous Monism?. In: HEIL, J.; MELE, A. (eds.). Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. p. 19-26.

KIM, J. Psychophysical Laws. In: LEPORE, E.; MCLAUGHLIN, B. (eds.). Actions and events: perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. New York: Blackwell, 1985, p. 369-386.

KIM, J. The Myth of Non-reductive Materialism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, v. 63, p. 31-47, 1989. ttps://doi.org/10.2307/3130081

KOCH, C. Consciousness: Confessions of a romantic reductionist. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2012.

LATHAM, N. What is Token Physicalism? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, v. 84, n. 3, p. 270-290, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00173

LOMBARD, L. Ontologies of Events. In: MACDONALD, C.; LAURENCE, S. (eds.). Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.

LYCAN, W. Giving Dualism its Due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, v. 87, n. 4, p. 551-563, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802340642

MARCUS, E. Events, Sortals, and the Mind-Body Problem. Synthese, n. 150, p. 99-129, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6258-7

MCLAUGHLIN, B. Anomalous Monism and the Irreducibility of the Mental. In: LEPORE, E.; MCLAUGHLIN, B. (orgs.). Actions and events: perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. New York: Blackwell, 1985. p. 331-368.

MCLAUGHLIN, B. On Davidson’s Response to the Charge of Epiphenomenalism. In: HEIL, J.; MELE, A. (orgs.) Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. p. 27-40.

QUIAN QUIROGA, R.; REDDY, L.; KREIMAN, G.; KOCH, C.; FRIED, I. Invariant Visual Representation by Single Neurons in the Human Brain. Nature, v. 435, p. 1102-1107, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03687

ROSKIES, A; NAHMIAS, E. Local determination, even if we could find it, does not challenge free will: Commentary on Marcelo Fischborn. Philosophical Psychology, n. 30, v. 1-2, 2017, p. 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1248286

SCHAFFER, J. The Metaphysics of Causation. In: Zalta, E. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), 2008. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/causation-metaphysics/. Acesso em 8 de abril de 2024.

SCHNEIDER, S. Non-Reductive Physicalism and the Mind Problem. Noûs, v. 47, n. 1, p. 135-153, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00847.x

SOSA, E. Davidson’s Thinking Causes. In: HEIL, J.; MELE, A. (eds.). Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. p. 41-50.

WU, W.; MORALES, J. The Neuroscience of Consciousness. In: Zalta, E; Nodelman, U. (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition), 2024. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/consciousness-neuroscience/. Acesso em 8 de abril de 2024.

YALOWITZ, S. Anomalous Monism. In: ZALTA, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), 2012. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/anomalous-monism/. Acesso em 8 de abril de 2024.

YALOWITZ, S. Rationality and the Argument for Anomalous Monism. Philosophical Studies, v. 87, n. 3, p. 235-258, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004200832034

Downloads

Publicado

2024-05-09

Como Citar

Fischborn, M. (2024). A anomalia persiste: revisitando algumas objeções ao monismo anômalo. Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 25(1), e65267. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2024v25i1:e65267