A new look at the unproductivity of resultative constructions in Brazilian Portuguese

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202339457357

Palabras clave:

resultative constructions, morphology, event framing, Brazilian Portuguese

Resumen

Typical resultative constructions in English are unavailable in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) and in Romance. This fact has been attributed by previous studies to different event-framings, following the Talmian view. English would illustrate the satellite-framing pattern, whereas Romance would illustrate the verb-framing pattern. Literature in BP has mainly focused on describing properties of different sentences similar to resultatives of the English type. A large part of the debate has been devoted to answering whether these can be classified as true resultatives. Much less attention has been dedicated to a proper description of the framing patterns in BP. This paper fills in this gap and, by doing so, argues that BP admits both framing patterns. The v-framing pattern is highly productive, exemplified by numerous complex parasynthetic verbs that entail a result. The s-framing pattern is marginal, illustrated by a small sample of modified resultatives and verb-particle constructions. This paper supports the framing analysis, but recasts its merits in light of new connections established among (apparent) resultatives in BP.

Biografía del autor/a

Bruna Elisa da Costa Moreira, Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Doutorado em Linguística (Universidade de Brasília). Pesquisadora Assistente credenciada ao Departamento de Linguística, Português e Línguas Clássicas da Universidade de Brasília.

Citas

Acedo-Matellán, V. (2016). The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford University Press.

Baker, M. C. (2004) Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge University Press.

Barbosa, J. W. C. (2008). A estrutura sintática das chamadas construções resultativas em PB. [Master thesis]. Universidade de São Paulo. https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8139/tde-07102008-151004/pt-br.php (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Barbosa, J. W. C (2012). Variação paramétrica em predicados complexos e nomes compostos: um estudo translinguístico. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidade de São Paulo. https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8139/tde-06032013-094902/publico/2012_JulioWilliamCurveloBarbosa_VCorr.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Barbosa, J. W. C. (2018). Ter estado resultante não é ter construção resultativa: predicados secundários pseudo-resultativos e orações adjuntas de resultado no português brasileiro. D.E.L.T.A. 34(2): 547-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-44508038365019402

Bassani, I. (2013). Uma abordagem localista para a morfologia e estrutura argumental dos verbos complexos (parassintéticos) do português brasileiro. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidade de São Paulo. https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8139/tde-19022014-104851/publico/2013_IndaiaDeSantanaBassani_VCorr.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Beavers, J. (2012). Resultative Constructions. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 909-933). Oxford University Press.

Bertucci, R. (2014). Construções resultativas infinitivas em português brasileiro. Alfa 59(3), 623-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1409-5

Bowers, J. (1997). A binary analysis of resultatives. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 1997 Texas Linguistics Society Conference. https://conf.ling.cornell.edu/bowers/Abinaryanalysisofresultatives.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H. (1992). The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2), 173-234. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178766 (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Embick, D. (2004). On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 355-392. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4179282

Folli, R., & Ramchand, G. (2005). Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. Van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on Aspect (pp. 81-105). Springer.

Foltran, M. J. G. D. (1999). As construções de predicação secundária no português do Brasil: aspectos sintáticos e semânticos. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of São Paulo.

Giannakidou, A., & Merchant, J. (1999). Why Giannis can’t scrub his plate clean: On the absence of resultative secondary predication in Greek. [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Athens. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=17a80298c012d733cf8ec1d78c9026b3b8c431b0

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37-81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174950

Harley, H. (2007). The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically (or: Why Mary can’t exhibit John her paintings). V Congresso Internacional da ABRALIN. http://heidiharley.com/heidiharley/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/harley_07_The-bipartite-s.pdf

Hoekstra, T. (1988). Small clause results. Lingua. 74(2-3), 101-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3

Houaiss, A. (2020) Dicionário Houaiss da língua portuguesa. Editora Objetiva.

Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Degree modification and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2), 345-381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071

Knöpfle, A. (2011). Resultativas adjetivais e o estatuto nu do adjetivo. Revista Estudos Linguísticos, 19(1), 115-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.19.1.115-142

Knöpfle, A. (2014). Resultativas em línguas ocidentais germânicas: generalizações descritivas, descobertas empíricas e questões analíticas. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Federal University of Paraná. https://acervodigital.ufpr.br/bitstream/1884/36580/1/R%20-%20T%20-%20ANDREA%20KNOPFLE.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Knöpfle, A. (2017a). Sobre resultativas e pseudoresultativas: distinções de base empírica. D.E.L.T.A., 33(2), 315-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-445005256075811671

Knöpfle, A. (2017b). Predicação secundária, modificação e ambiguidade: uma reflexão de base empírica. Revista do GELNE, 19(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.21680/1517-7874.2017v19n2ID11229

Kopecka, A. (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic systems and Cognitive Categories (pp. 83-101). John Benjamins.

Kratzer, A. (2005). Building resultatives. In C. Maienborn, & A. Wöllstein-Leisen (Eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and Applications (pp. 177-212). Niemeyer Tübingen Publisher.

Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1996). Two types of derived accomplishments. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the First LFG Workshop, Grenoble, France. https://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/lfg96.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Levinson, L. (2010). Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28, 135-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x

Lobato, L. (2004). Afinal, existe a construção resultativa em português? In L. Negri, M. J. Foltran, & R. Pires de Oliveira (Eds.), Sentido e significação em torno da obra de Rodolfo Ilari (pp. 142-180). Editora Contexto.

Marcelino, M. (2000). Construções Resultativas em Português e em Inglês: Uma Nova Análise. [Master thesis]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.

Marcelino, M. (2007). O parâmetro de composição e a aquisição/aprendizagem de L2. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP. http://www.educadores.diaadia.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/2010/artigos_teses/Ingles/marcelino.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Marcelino, M. (2014). Resultativas em português brasileiro. Veredas on-line, 18(1), 121-137. https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/24976

Mateu, J. (2000). Why can’t we wipe the slate clean? A lexical-syntactic approach to resultative constructions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 71-95. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/CatalanWP/article/download/18160/18001

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2020). Online Dictionary. [online access at [online access at https://www.merriam-webster.com/ (last accessed 04 July, 2020).

Molina, S. G., Herranz, I. N., & Jiménez, I. P. (1999). Some remarks on de-adjectival verbs and resultative secondary predicates. Catalan Working Paper in Linguistics, 7, 107-124. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/CatalanWP/article/download/18146/17988/0

Moreira, B. E. C. (2021). Improving Secondary Predication in Romance. ReVEL (edição especial), 19(18), 166-187. http://www.revel.inf.br/files/67b77924f4a21168f3924cfb599a1dd7.pdf

Napoli, D. J. (1992). Resultative Predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 53-90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4176146

Ramchand, G. C. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first phase syntax. Cambridge University Press.

Rech, N. (2007). A formação de construções resultativas no português brasileiro. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, 49(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v49i1.8637248

Simpson, J. (1983). Resultatives. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar (pp. 143-157). Indiana University Linguistics Club. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/140

Snyder, W. (1995). Language Acquisition and Language Variation: The Role of Morphology. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/11130 (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Snyder, W., & Beck, S. (2001) The Resultative Parameter and Restitutive Again. In C. Féry & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Armim von Stechow (pp. 48-69). Akademie Verlag.

Snyder, W. (2001). On the nature of syntactic variation: evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language, 77(2), 324-342. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3086777

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Descriptions: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 57-149). Cambridge University Press.

Talmy, L. (1991). Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Proceedings of The Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17 (pp. 480-519). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620

Washio, R. (1997). Compositionality and Language Variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110

Wechsler, S. (2001). An analysis of English resultatives under the event-argument homomorphism model of telicity. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure (pp. 13-15). https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/s07/events/wechsler05.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2021).

Wechsler, S. (2015). Word meaning and syntax. Approaches to the interface. Oxford University Press.

Publicado

2023-12-27

Cómo citar

da Costa Moreira, B. E. (2023). A new look at the unproductivity of resultative constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. DELTA: Documentação E Estudos Em Linguística Teórica E Aplicada, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202339457357