Linguistics and gesture studies in Brazil: data collection and discussion on the state of the art

Authors

  • Maíra Avelar Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia
  • Adriana Fernandes Barbosa Universidade de Brasília
  • Beatriz Graça Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202541263528

Keywords:

Gesture Studies, Linguistics, State-of-the-art study

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the state of the art of research carried out in Brazil on the interface between Linguistics and Gesture Studies. To this end, we first carried out a survey of academic-scientific production on gestures in the country over the past 20 years using the Google Scholar and Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD) platforms. Based on an analysis of the titles, abstracts and bibliographical references of the works found, it was possible to determine whether they fall within the scope of research on gestures in the interface with linguistic studies. Of the 144 papers found, 76 were selected for analysis and discussion. The results show that, although all the articles base their analysis and discussion on the theoretical framework of Gesture Studies, only 28 articles discuss and apply specific methods for gesture analysis, mostly LASG and MIG-G. In addition, the survey reveals a growing trend in gesture research in Brazil, with the number of publications having doubled in the last 5 years.

References

Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. (2011). Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement?. Semiotica , 2011(184), 53-91. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022

Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body - Language - Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction , vol. 1 (pp. 1079-1097). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1079 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1079

Bressem, J., Ladewig, S., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures. In C. Müller , A. Cienki, E. Fricke , S. Ladewig, D. McNeill , & S. Tessendorf (Ed.), Body - Language - Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction , vol. 1 (pp. 1098-1124). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1098 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1098

Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 189-204). CSLI Publications.

Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5-25). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.04cie » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.04cie

Cienki, A. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics , 27(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0063 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0063

Cienki, A. (2017). Analyzing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 131-147). Routledge.

Cienki, A. (2022). The study of gesture in cognitive linguistics: How it could inform and inspire other research in cognitive science. WIREs Cognitive Science , 13(6), e1623. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1623 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1623

Harrison, S. (2018). The Grammar-Gesture Nexus: A Mechanism for Regularity in Gesture. In The Impulse to Gesture: Where Language, Minds, and Bodies Intersect (pp. 21-46). Cambridge University Press.

International Society for Gesture Studies - ISGS (n.d.). Who we are Disponível em: Disponível em: https://www.gesturestudies.com Acesso em 03/09/2023. » https://www.gesturestudies.com

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and Speech: Two Aspects of the Process of Utterance. In The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication (pp. 207-228). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813098.207 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813098.207

Kendon, A. (1983). The Study of Gesture: Some Remarks on its History. In J. N. Deely, M. D. Lenhart (eds). Semiotics 1981. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_15 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_15

Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131-141). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: unity or duality? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 47-63). Cambridge University Press.

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance Cambridge University Press.

Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In I. Wachsmuth, & M. Fröhlich (eds), Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction GW 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1371. Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986

Ladewig, S., & Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of gesture phases. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Ed.), Body - Language - Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction , vol. 1 (pp. 1060-1079). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1060 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1060

McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review , 92 (3), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought Chicago University Press.

McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica , 95 (1-2), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5

McNeill, D. (ed.) (2000). Language and Gesture Cambridge University Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought University of Chicago Press.

McNeill D. (2016). Why We Gesture: The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication Cambridge University Press.

Mondada, L. (2007). Commentary: transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies , 9(6), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082581 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082581

Mondada, L. (2013). Multimodal interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Ed.), Body - Language - Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction , vol. 1 (pp. 577-589). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.577 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.577

Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction, Journal of Pragmatics , 65 , 137-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004

Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 51 (1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878

Müller, C. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Ed.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 219-245). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.12mul » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.12mul

Müller, C. (2014). Gesture as “deliberate expressive movement”. In M. Seyfeddinipur, & M. Gullberg (Ed.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 127-152). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.07mul » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.07mul

Müller, C. (2018). Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations? Frontiers in Psychology , 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651

Mulligan, A., Hall, L., & Raphael, E. (2013), Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 64 (1), 132-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798

Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture PhD Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen. https://doi.org/10.17617/2.59337 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17617/2.59337

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2

Streeck, J. (2017). Self-Making Man: A Day of Action, Life, and Language Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341 » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world Cambridge University Press.

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Avelar, M., Fernandes Barbosa, A., & Graça , B. (2026). Linguistics and gesture studies in Brazil: data collection and discussion on the state of the art. DELTA: Documentação E Estudos Em Linguística Teórica E Aplicada, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202541263528