Orofacial myofunctional assessment protocols for cleft lip and palate

systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2024v36i3e66169

Keywords:

Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Stomatognathic System, Stomatognathic System Abnormalities, Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: Cleft Lip and Palate are congenital malformations that affect the lips and/or palate and compromise other orofacial structures and functions. The orofacial myofunctional alterations caused by clefts are specific to the malformation and require a comprehensive and specific evaluation of the stomatognathic system. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to identify the orofacial myofunctional assessment protocols for cleft lip and palate and to verify the specific variables for the assessment of this malformation. Methods: This systematic review followed the recommendations of the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses”, approved by the COMPESQ of the educational institution and registered in PROSPERO. The search strategy for the review was guided by the “PICO” strategy. Searches were conducted in the following databases (between 2010 and May 2020): MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scielo. Cross-sectional observational studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, and clinical trials were included, with instruments for orofacial myofunctional evaluation for cleft lip and palate in English, Spanish, and Portuguese languages. The “Study Quality Assessment Tools” were used to assess the quality of observational studies. Results: Three articles with protocols for orofacial myofunctional evaluation among the population with cleft lip and palate were included. The variables considered specific in the comparison of protocols were lips, tongue, teeth, cheeks, hard palate, labial, and lingual mobility. Conclusion: This systematic review identified three orofacial myofunctional assessment protocols for individuals with cleft lip and palate, focusing on the evaluation of the structures of the lips, tongue, soft and hard palate, cheeks, teeth, and labial and lingual mobility. The comparison of frequent items with the AMIOFE-A protocol indicated the absence of essential variables such as: FLP classification, scar characteristics, evaluation of the lingual frenulum, number of teeth, presence and appearance of the uvula and palatine tonsils, mobility of the soft palate and pharynx, as well as specific aspects of speech and velopharyngeal function. It is recommended to create a comprehensive instrument that assesses orofacial functions, structures, mobility, tonicity, and sensitivity. This would aid in the development of precise therapeutic plans and improve the quality of research. Furthermore, future studies should standardize the age ranges of samples to allow for more accurate comparisons and widely applicable protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Allessandra Fraga Da Ré, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre

Fonoaudióloga, Mestre e Doutoranda em Ciências da Reabilitação - UFCSPA

Gustavo Jungblut Kniphoff, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre

Fisioterapeuta, Mestre e Doutor em Ciências da Reabilitação.

Maria Cristina de Almeida Freitas Cardoso, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre

Fonoaudióloga, Doutora, Professora do Departamento de Fonoaudiologia e do PGG Ciências da Reabilitação da UFCSPA.

References

Marchesan IQ. Avaliando e tratando o sistema estomatognático. In: Campiotto AR et al. Tratado de Fonoaudiologia. São Paulo (SP): Roca, 1997; 763-80.

Genaro KF, Berretin-Felix, Rehder MIBC, Marchesan IQ. Avaliação miofuncional orofacial: protocolo MBGR. Revista Cefac. 2009; 11(2): 237-55.

Folha GA. Ampliação das escalas numéricas do Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial (AMIOFE), validação e confiabilidade. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo. 2010.

Felício CM, Ferreira CLP. Protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 7(3): 367-75.

Felício CM, Medeiros AP, de Oliveira Melchior M. Validity of the ‘protocol of oro-facial myofunctional evaluation with scores’ for young and adult subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39(10): 744-53.

Benacchio EGM. Desenvolvimento do manual de aplicação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial-MBGR [tese de doutorado]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2019.

Souza-Freitas JÁ, Dalben GS, Freitas PZ, Santamaria Jr. M. Tendência familial das fissuras lábio-palatais. Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial, 2004; 9(5): 74-8.

Shibukawa BMC Rissi GP, Higarashi IH, Oliveira RP. Factors associated with the presence of cleft lip and / or cleft palate in Brazilian newborns. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant. [Internet]. 2019; 19(4): 947-56.

Silva RN, Santos EMNG. Ocorrência de alterações de motricidade oral e fala em indivíduos portadores de fissuras labiopalatinas. RBPS. 2004;17(1): 27-30.

Montes ABM, Oliveira TM, Gavião MBD, Barbosa TS. Orofacial functions and quality of life in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Brazilian oral research, 2019; 33.

Liberati A et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10): e1-34.

Eriksen MB, Tove FF. O impacto do paciente, intervenção, comparação, resultado (PICO) como uma ferramenta de estratégia de pesquisa na qualidade da pesquisa de literatura: uma revisão sistemática. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 106.4, 2018; 420.

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. 2013. Acesso em 2021, https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.

Graziani AF, Fukushiro AP, Marchesan IQ, Berretin-Félix G, Genaro KF. Ampliação e validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial para indivíduos com fissura labiopalatina. CoDAS, 2019; 31.

Campillay PL, Delgado SE, Brescovici SM. Avaliação da alimentação em crianças com fissura de lábio e/ou palato atendidas em um hospital de Porto Alegre. Rev. CEFAC. 2010; 12(2): 257-66.

Menegueti KI, Mangilli LD, Alonso N, Andrade CRF. Perfil da fala de pacientes submetidos à palatoplastia primária. CoDAS, 2017; 29.

Rossi DC, Di Ninno CQMS, Silva KRS, Motta AR. O efeito da massagem no processo de cicatrização labial em crianças operadas de fissura transforame unilateral. Rev. CEFAC, 2005; 7(2): 205-14.

Marçano ACB et al. X-linked cleft palate and ankyloglossia: refinement of the minimal critical region in Xq21.3. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2000; 67, A1802.

Stanier P, Moore GE. Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts. Human molecular genetics, 2004; 13(1): 73-81.

Von den Hoff JW, Carvajal Monroy PL, Ongkosuwito EM, van Kuppevelt TH, Daamen WF. Muscle fibrosis in the soft palate: delivery of cells, growth factors and anti-fibrotics. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2019; 146, 60- 76.

Nakahara K, Mishiba K, Doi R, Kondo K. Nasal expiration image detection on mirror surface using alternating optimization. In: Proceedings of the 7th IIAE International conference on industrial application engineering. 2019: 233-8.

Freitas JS, Cardoso MCAF. Sintomas de disfagia em crianças com fissura labial e/ou palatina pré e pós-correção cirúrgica. CoDAS. 2018; 30(1): e20170018.

Marino VCC, Dutka JCR, Pegoraro-Krook MI, Lima-Gregio AM. Articulação compensatória associada à fissura de palato ou disfunção velofaríngea: revisão de literatura. Revista CEFAC, 2012; 14: 528-43.

Martins PB, Cardoso MCAF. Variações articulatórias nas fissuras labiopalatinas: enfoque fonoterapêutico. Universitas: Ciências da Saúde, Brasília. 2015, 13 (1):17-27.

Da Ré AF, Cardoso MCAF. Importância da oroscopia na avaliação fonoaudiológica: Relato de caso. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 2021; 4(1), 217-24.

Totta T. Análise do padrão mastigatório em indivíduos com fissura labiopalatina [tese]. Bauru (SP): Universidade de São Paulo. 2016.

Clarren SK, Anderson B, Wolf LS. Feeding infants with cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 224–249.

Bessell A, Hooper L, Shaw WC, Reilly S, Reid J, Glenny AM. Intervenções de alimentação para o crescimento e desenvolvimento de bebês com fenda labial, fenda palatina ou lábio leporino. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (2): CD003315.

Cooper ME, Ratay JS, Marazita ML. Asian oral-facial cleft birth prevalence. Cleft Palate J, 2006; 43: 580-89.

Loh J, Ascoli M. Cross-cultural attitudes and perceptions towards cleft lip and palate deformities. World Cult Psychiatry Res Rev, 2011; 6(2): 127-34.

Published

2024-11-05

How to Cite

Da Ré, A. F., Kniphoff, G. J., & Cardoso, M. C. de A. F. (2024). Orofacial myofunctional assessment protocols for cleft lip and palate: systematic review. Distúrbios Da Comunicação, 36(3), e66169. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2024v36i3e66169

Issue

Section

Artigos