Nos braços da maioria silenciosa

o viés de falso consenso e os desafios da democracia em tempos de radicalização política

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

viés de falso consenso, polarização política, tribalização identitária, radicalização ideológica, democracia deliberativa

Resumen

O viés de falso consenso, tendência dos indivíduos a superestimarem o grau de concordância social com suas próprias crenças e atitudes, constitui um dos mecanismos psicológicos centrais para a compreensão de certas dificuldades que enfrenta a política democrática hoje. Este artigo revisa criticamente 64 estudos relevantes sobre o tema, discutindo sua evolução teórica e metodológica e suas aplicações ao campo político. Defende-se aqui que o falso consenso contribui para a polarização afetiva, a tribalização identitária, a radicalização ideológica e a indisponibilidade para o compromisso democrático, ao distorcer a percepção da diversidade de opiniões e legitimar práticas de intolerância. Por fim, discute-se a necessidade de estratégias que enfrentem esse viés para fortalecer a convivência pluralista em sociedades democráticas.

Biografía del autor/a

Wilson da Silva Gomes, Universidade Federal da Bahia

É professor titular de Teoria da Comunicação na Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) e coordenador do Instituto Nacional de Ciência & Tecnologia em Democracia Digital (INCT.DD). Doutor em Filosofia, dedica-se à pesquisa sobre comunicação política, democracia e esfera pública digital. É autor de diversos livros e artigos sobre o tema, entre eles Transformações da política na era digital (Paulus, 2024), A imagem política na esfera pública (Ideias & Letras, 2025) e A democracia no mundo digital (Edições Sesc, 2024). Suas investigações abordam as transformações contemporâneas da política sob o impacto das tecnologias digitais, os desafios democráticos decorrentes da desinformação e o papel da comunicação na construção da legitimidade política.

Citas

ALICKE, Mark D.; LARGO, Edward. The role of self in the false consensus effect. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 28–47, 1995.

AMES, Daniel R. Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 87, n. 3, p. 340–353, 2004.

BAUMAN, Kathleen P.; GEHER, Glenn. We think you agree: the detrimental impact of the false consensus effect on behavior. In: Current Psychology, v. 21, n. 4, p. 293–318, 2002.

BOSVELD, Willem; KOOMEN, Willem; VAN DER PLIGT, Joop. Selective exposure and the false consensus effect: the availability of similar and dissimilar others. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 33, n. 4, p. 457–466, 1994.

BOSVELD, Willem; KOOMEN, Willem; VAN DER PLIGT, Joop; PLAISIER, Janine W. Differential construal as an explanation for false consensus and false uniqueness effects. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 31, n. 6, p. 518–532, 1995.

BURGHARTSWIESER, Dominic; ROTHMUND, Tobias. Conservative bias, selective political exposure and truly false consensus beliefs in political communication about the ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. In: PLOS ONE, v. 16, n. 11, e0259445, 2021.

BURSZTYN, Leonardo; YANG, David Y. Misperceptions about others. In: Annual Review of Economics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 425–452, 2022.

CADINU, Maria Rosaria; ROTHBART, Myron. Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 70, n. 4, p. 661–677, 1996.

CLEMENT, Russell W.; KRUEGER, Joachim. The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 39, n. 2, p. 279–299, 2000.

DAWES, Robyn M. Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1–17, 1989.

FABRIGAR, Leandre R.; KROSNICK, Jon A. Attitude importance and the false consensus effect. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v. 21, n. 5, p. 468–479, 1995.

GILOVICH, Thomas. Differential construal and the false consensus effect. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 59, n. 4, p. 623–634, 1990.

GVIRSMAN, Shira Dvir. Testing our quasi-statistical sense: news use, political know-ledge, and false projection. In: Political Psychology, v. 36, n. 6, p. 729–747, 2015.

HOCH, Stephen J. Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: the pros and cons of projection. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 53, n. 2, p. 221–234, 1987.

JONES, Paul E. False consensus in social context: differential projection and perceived social distance. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 43, n. 3, p. 417–429, 2004.

KRUEGER, Joachim. On the perception of social consensus. In: ZANNA, Mark P. (org.). Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998. p. 163–240.

KRUEGER, Joachim; CLEMENT, Russell W. The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 67, n. 4, p. 596–610, 1994.

KRUEGER, Joachim; CLEMENT, Russell W. Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: the case for social projection. In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, v. 1, n. 4, p. 299–313, 1997.

KRUEGER, Joachim; ZEIGER, Joanna S. Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 65, n. 4, p. 670–680, 1993.

LUZSA, Robert; MAYR, Susanne. False consensus in the echo chamber: exposure to favorably biased social media news feeds leads to increased perception of public support for own opinions. In: Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, v. 15, n. 1, 2021.

MARKS, Gary; MILLER, Norman. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. In: Psychological Bulletin, v. 102, n. 1, p. 72–90, 1987.

MONIN, Benoît; NORTON, Michael I. Perceptions of a fluid consensus: uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v. 29, n. 5, p. 559–567, 2003.

MORRISON, Kimberly Rios; MATTHES, Jörg. Socially motivated projection: need to belong increases perceived opinion consensus on important issues. In: European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 41, n. 6, p. 707–719, 2011.

MULLEN, Brian et al. The false consensus effect: a meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 262–283, 1985.

MULLEN, Brian; HU, Li-tze. Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: two meta analytic integrations. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 27, n. 4, p. 333–356, 1988.

NICKERSON, Raymond S. How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. In: Psychological Bulletin, v. 125, n. 6, p. 737–759, 1999.

PRINSTEIN, Mitchell J.; WANG, Shirley S. False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. In: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, v. 33, n. 3, p. 293–306, 2005.

ROSS, Lee; GREENE, David; HOUSE, Pamela. The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 279–301, 1977.

SANDERS, Glenn S.; MULLEN, Brian. Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. In: European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 57–70, 1983.

SCHULZ, Anne; WIRTH, Werner; MÜLLER, Philipp. We are the people and you are fake news: a social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. In: Communication Research, v. 47, n. 2, p. 201–226, 2020.

SEVENANS, Julie et al. Projection in politicians’ perceptions of public opinion. In: Political Psychology, v. 44, n. 6, p. 1259–1279, 2023.

SHERMAN, Steven J.; PRESSON, Clark C.; CHASSIN, Laurie. Mechanisms underlying the false consensus effect: the special role of threats to the self. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v. 10, n. 1, p. 127–138, 1984.

SOLAN, Lawrence; ROSENBLATT, Terri; OSHERSON, Daniel. False consensus bias in contract interpretation. In: Columbia Law Review, v. 108, n. 5, p. 1268–1300, 2008.

STEINER, Nils D.; LANDWEHR, Claudia; HARMS, Philipp. False consensus beliefs and populist attitudes. In: Political Psychology, 2025. (Online ahead of print).

SULS, Jerry; WAN, C. K. In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: fear and estimates of social consensus. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 52, n.1, p. 211–217, 1987.

SULS, Jerry; WAN, Choi K.; SANDERS, Glenn S. False consensus and false uniqueness in estimating the prevalence of health-protective behaviors. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 66–79, 1988.

TABACHNIK, Naomi; CROCKER, Jennifer; ALLOY, Lauren B. Depression, social comparison, and the false-consensus effect. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 45, n. 3, p. 688–699, 1983.

VANDEWEERDT, Clara. Someone like you: false consensus in perceptions of Democrats and Republicans. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, v. 32, n. 3, p. 739–749, 2022.

WEINSCHENK, Aaron C.; PANAGOPOULOS, Costas; VAN DER LINDEN, Sander. Democratic norms, social projection, and false consensus in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In: Journal of Political Marketing, v. 20, n. 3–4, p. 255–268, 2021.

WOJCIESZAK, Magdalena E. False consensus goes online: impact of ideologically homogeneous groups on false consensus. In: Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 72, n. 4, p. 781–791, 2008.

WOJCIESZAK, Magdalena E.; PRICE, Vincent. What underlies the false consensus effect? How personal opinion and disagreement affect perception of public opinion. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, v. 21, n. 1, p. 25–46, 2009.

WOJCIESZAK, Magdalena Elzbieta. Computer-mediated false consensus: radical online groups, social networks and news media. In: Mass Communication and Society, v. 14, n. 4, p. 527–546, 2011.

Publicado

2025-12-25

Cómo citar

Gomes, W. da S. (2025). Nos braços da maioria silenciosa: o viés de falso consenso e os desafios da democracia em tempos de radicalização política. GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar De Comunicação E Cultura, 50(1), e71482. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/71482

Número

Sección

Artigos | Articles