A social movement seen from within: the counter-hegemonic proposal of the “Urban Rights” Movement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2021-5010

Keywords:

new social movements, counter-hegemony, discourse, urban rights, Foucauldian analysis

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the discourse of the social movement “Urban Rights” (UR) and understand how this movement is articulated to challenge hegemonic discourses of modern urbanism and promote discourses that are alternative to the neoliberal model. We used the theoretical contribution of the New Social Movements (NSMs) theory. Foucault's archeology was employed in order to identify the strategies for constructing the UR discourse based on the subjects that constitute it. The analyses indicated that UR is a counter-hegemonic and resistant center that combats the urban management model developed in the city of Recife, affirming an alternative city project. UR has a fluid hierarchy, dynamic and contingency strategies, operates in a network, and agglomerates for specific demands.

Author Biographies

Jouberte Maria Leandro Santos, Instituto Federal de Pernambuco - IFPE

Professora do Instituto Federal de Pernambuco. Doutora em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (PROPAD-UFPE) e Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (modalidade sanduíche).

Sérgio Carvalho Benício de Mello, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Tem formação na área de Administração de Empresas e Filosofia, tendo alcançado o título de Doutor pela City, University of London, Reino Unido (1997). É Professor Titular da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco e bolsista de produtividade em pesquisa nível 1D do CNPq. Tem experiência nas áreas de ensino e pesquisa atuando principalmente com os seguintes temas: Estudos Urbanos; Mobilidades; Tecnologias; Política e Práticas Discursivas; Pós-Estruturalismo.

Published

2020-12-03

How to Cite

Santos, J. M. L., & de Mello, S. C. B. (2020). A social movement seen from within: the counter-hegemonic proposal of the “Urban Rights” Movement. Cadernos Metrópole, 23(50), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2021-5010