A teoria dos stakeholders nas diferentes perspectivas
controvérsias, conveniências e críticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2020v35i2p43-58Palavras-chave:
Partes interessadas, Teoria da Administração, Ciências sociais aplicadasResumo
As ciências sociais aplicadas se caracterizam por controvérsias, conveniências e críticas. Por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica, exploratória, o objetivo do trabalho está em analisar as controvérsias, conveniências e críticas decorrentes das especificidades e limites presentes nas diferentes abordagens da teoria dos stakeholders. Os resultados da pesquisa apontam que a teoria dos stakeholders apresenta inúmeros pontos questionáveis, desde a classificação dos conceitos até a pertinência dos modelos propostos. A contribuição da pesquisa, ao destacar as controvérsias, conveniências e críticas remete a importância de explicitar critérios objetivos para ordenamento dos fins organizacionais, em situações de conflitos de interesse.
Referências
ARGANDOÑA, A. The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 17, n. 9-10, p. 1093-1102, 1998.
BAZANINI, R. Filosofia e evolução das ideias sociais: visão crítica das ideologias no mundo dos negócios. São Paulo, Plêiade, 2010.
BAZANINI, R.; BAZANINI, H. L. Filosofia e ética nas Ciências Sociais Aplicadas: estratégias e lógica da Inteligência Competitiva. São Paulo: Plêiade, 2014.
BEAUCAMP, A & A BOWE, B. Ethical Theory and Business. (6a ed.). Prentice Hall. P.45-105, 2001.
BOAVENTURA, J. M. G, BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R., MONZONI, M. P., SIMONETTI, R., SARTURI, G. Limites da Teoria dos Stakeholders: a Questão da Dominância. In: Encontro da ANPAD, XXXVII, Rio de Janeiro. Anais... Rio de Janeiro, EnANPAD, 2013.
BRICKSON, S. L. Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations. Relations with Stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 50, p. 576-609, 2005.
BRIDOUX, F.; STOELHORST, J. W. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, v. 35, n. 1, p. 107-125, 2014.
CLARKSON, M. E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, v. 20, n. 1, p. 92-117, 1995.
CRANE, A. e RUEBOTTOM, T. Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 102, p. 1. P. 77-87, 2011.
DONALDSON, T. & DUNFEE, T.W. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. 1999.
DONALDSON, T.; PRESTON, L. E. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review. New York – USA, v. 20, n. 01, p. 65-91., jan.1995.
EVAN, W; FREEMAN, R,E. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian Capitalism. Ethical Theory and Business. 5a. ed. Englewood Ethics Prentice Hall, 1988.
FASSIN, Y. The stakeholder model refined. Journal of business ethics, v. 84, n. 1, p. 113-135, 2009.
FREEMAN, R. E. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, v.4, p. 409-422, 1994.
FREEMAN, R. E. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, v.24, n.2, p. 233-236, 1999.
FREEMAN, R.E et al. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
FREEMAN, R. E., HARRISON, J. S., & WICKS, A. C. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press, 2007
FREEMAN, R.E., HARRISON, J. e WICKS, A. Managing for stakeholders: business in the 21st century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.
FREEMAN, R. E., PHILLIPS, R., & SISODIA, R. Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Business & Society, 2018.
FREEMAN, E. R.; REED, D. L. Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, v. 25, n.3, p. 88-106, 1983.
FRIEDMAN, A.; MILES, S. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice: Oxford University Press. New York, 2006.
FROOMAN, J. Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review. New York, v. 24, n. 2, p.191-205, 1999.
GIOIA, D. A. Practicability, paradigms, and problems in Stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, v. 34, n.2, p. 228-232, 1999.
GRANOVETTER, M. Ação econômica e estrutura social: O problema da imersão. RAE – Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 6, n. 1, p.1-41, 2007.
HARRISON, J.; FREEMAN, E.; ABREU, M. C. S. Stakeholder Theory as an ethical approach to effective management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, v. 17, n. 55, p. 858-869. 2015.
HILL, C. W. L. e JONES, T. M. Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, v. 29, n. 2, p. 131-154, 1992.
JENSEN, M.C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business ethics quarterly, p. 235-256, 2002
JONES, T. M. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 404- 437, Apr. 1995.
JONES, Thomas M.; WICKS, Andrew C. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review, v. 24, n. 2, p. 206-221, 1999.
MARCOUX, A. M. Balancing Act. In: Desjardins, J. R., & McCall, J. J. Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics. (4th. ed.) Belmont, Califf: Wadsworth, 2000.
MITCHELL, R. K., AGLE, B. R. e WOOD, D. J. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, New York, v. 22, n.4, p. 853-886, 1997.
NOHRIA, N.; ECLES, R. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1992.
PARENT, M. M; DEEPHOUSE, D. L. A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics., v. 75, p. 1-23, 2007.
PFEFFER, J.; SALANCIK, G. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper & Row, 1978.
Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berret Koehler Publishers, 2003.
PHILLIPS, R. A. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 7, n. 1, p. 51-66, 1997.
PHILLIPS, R.; FREEMAN, R. E.; WICKS, A. C. What Stakeholder Theory Is Not. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 13, n. 4, p. 479-502, Oct. 2003
POLONSKY, M. e SCOTT, D. (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, v, 39 , n. 9-10, p. 1199-1221.
POST, J. E.; PRESTON, L. E.; SACHS, S. Managing the extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 6-28, Fall, 2002.
ROWLEY, T. J. Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. The Academy of Management Review, New York, v.22, n. 4, p. 887–910, 1997.
SCHNEIDER, T.; SACHS, S. The impact of stakeholder identities on value creation in issue-based stakeholder networks. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 144, n. 1, p. 41-57, 2017
STOCKER, F.; MASCENA, K. M. C. Orientação e gestão para stakeholders no processo de decisão organizacional. R.G.SecrGESEC, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 1, p. 167-191, jan.-abr. 2019.
SUCHMAN, M. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review. v. 20, 1995.
STERNBERG, R. J. Practical Intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge, 2000.
WEBER, M. Economia y Sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. XVII reimpresión. Buenos Aires: Fondo de cultura económica, 2008.
WOOD, D. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, v. 16, p. 691-718, 1991.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Pensamento & Realidade
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os autores concedem à revista todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os conceitos emitidos em artigos assinados são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
