Influencers of Collaborative Management in Supply Chains

Authors

  • Mauro Vivaldini Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba (UNIMEP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2017v19i3.32813

Keywords:

Collaborative Management, Supply Chain, Performance.

Abstract

Collaborative supply chain management has proven to be a way for organizations to improve their relationships in order to achieve better results in their business. This management model is relatively complex because it involves different interests of the organizations, but it can provide new knowledge capable of contributing to the results of the companies. It is the objective of this study, using the literary revision method limited specifically to the theme, to know how values and organizational capacities are generated through collaborative actions, relating them to influencers that contribute or do not contribute to this management model. The research emphasize the importance of all supply chain actors in building collaboration, points out influencers that contribute or not to this management model, and highlights the organizational values and capabilities generated, concluding that the potential generated by collaborative management in the supply chain is based on the knowledge acquired and the competitive advantage that the organization obtains.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Mauro Vivaldini, Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba (UNIMEP)

Mestre em Administração e doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela UNIMEP, onde atua como professor nas áreas de Logística e Cadeia de Suprimentos. Possui especializações e MBAs em Varejo, Marketing e Produção, e mais de 20 anos de experiência profissional no comando de operações industriais e logísticas em grandes empresas nacionais e multinacionais. Também é autor de livro e diversos artigos na área de logística publicados em congressos e revistas especializadas.

Published

2017-08-31

How to Cite

Vivaldini, M. (2017). Influencers of Collaborative Management in Supply Chains. Management in Dialogue Review, 19(3), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2017v19i3.32813