Innovative Approaches to the Administration of Social Support and Interagency Cooperation in the Field of Social Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2024v26iSI.72999Keywords:
Social services, community, counseling, interagency cooperation, social support, social policyAbstract
In the context of modern social transformations, innovative administration of social support and interagency cooperation are key to enhancing social service efficiency. Integrated management models using digital technologies, cross-sectoral coordination, and organizational partnerships ensure systematic, coherent support. This study examines the theoretical and methodological foundations of interagency cooperation as a tool to optimize resources, strengthen social cohesion, and improve community-level social policy. A survey of 876 service recipients and 188 providers revealed high awareness of integrated approaches (59.7% recipients, 75% providers) and positive impacts on vulnerable groups (82.5% recipients, 88.8% providers). However, full implementation of innovative practices remains limited, with barriers including regulatory gaps, lack of unified methodology, and insufficient professional training, highlighting the need to enhance human, regulatory, and digital support.
References
Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Creativity and innovation under constraints: a cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832
Andreassen, T. A. (2018). Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work: Lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. European Journal of Social Work, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423548
Andriyiv, N., Honchar, M., Mironova, Y., Petrukha, N., & Hrytsyshyn, A. (2022). The impact of military actions on the labor market of Ukraine and the EU: Economic, social and security aspects. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(5), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.5.96
Andriyiv, N., Zachepa, A., Petrukha, N., Shevchuk, I., & Berest, I. (2021). Informational aspects of changing the labor market of the EU and Ukraine through COVID-19. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(12), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.12.90
Anheier, H., Krlev, G., & Mildenberger, G. (2019). Social innovation: Comparative perspectives. Taylor & Francis. 319 p. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/7d497590-c029-4c93-aca4-285735b782c5/9781351655354.pdf
Antonio, L. P., Raquel, P. G., & Victoria, A.-T. M. M. (2018a). e-Social work: Building a new field of specialization in social work? European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 804–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1399256
Antonio, E. M., José, M. J.-P., & Chaime, M. S. (2018b). e-Social work in practice: A case study. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423552
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., & O'Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
Baker, S., Warburton, J., Hodgkin, S., & Pascal, J. (2014). Reimagining the relationship between social work and information communication technology in the network society. Australian Social Work, 67(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.928336
Benjamin, L. M., Voida, A., & Bopp, C. (2020). Policy fields, data systems, and the performance of nonprofit human service organizations. In Human service organizations and the question of impact. Routledge. pp. 73-92. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429280535-5/policy-fields-data-systems-performance-nonprofit-human-service-organizations-lehn-benjamin-amy-voida-chris-bopp
Berzin, S. C., & Coulton, C. J. (2015). Practice innovation through technology in the digital age: A grand challenge for social work (Grand Challenges for Social Work Initiative Working Paper No. 12). Cleveland, OH: American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare
Bode, I. (2017). Social services in post-industrial Europe: An incomplete success story and its tragic moments. In Social services disrupted. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 95-113. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/563d/7f6f7e8a566e208d17d210247420125af3f4.pdf
Borzaga, C., & Bodini, R. (2014). What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746414000116
Bradt, L., Roose, R., & Devlieghere, J. (2017). Creating transparency through electronic information systems: Opportunities and pitfalls. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx052
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
Chan, C., & Holosko, M. J. (2016). A review of information and communication technology enhanced social work interventions. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515578884
Cherneta, S., Zhuk, O., Savchuk, N., Babii, M., & Bielkina-Kovalchuk, O. (2024). Social issues of modernity and their impact on socio-psychological health in the community. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 14(01-XLII), 177–181. https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140142/papers/A_36.pdf
Čižikienė, J. (2020). Managers’ leadership in choosing to implement the European quality assurance system for social services (Vadovų lyderystė pasirenkant diegti Europos socialinių paslaugų kokybės užtikrinimo sistemą) [Doctoral dissertation, Mykolas Romeris University]. Mykolas Romeris University Institutional Repository. https://cris.mruni.eu/cris/entities/etd/16697911-84a4-412c-86bb-301499aa378a
Crepaldi, C., De Rosa, E., & Pesce, F. (2012). Literature Review on Innovation in Social Services in Europe (sectors of Health, Education and Welfare Services). Report. IRS 2012. A deliverable of the project INNOSERV, European Commission-7th Framework Program. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
Dingfelder, H. E., & Mandell, D. S. (2011). Bridging the research-to-practice gap in autism intervention: An application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(5), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1081-0
Eurich, J., & Langer, A. (2016). Social innovations as opportunities: How can innovations in social services be stimulated and managed. Diaconia, 7(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.13109/diac.2016.7.2.174
Flynn, M. L. (2017). Science, innovation, and social work: Clash or convergence? Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516686198
Gillingham, P. (2015). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
Gillingham, P. (2016). Electronic information systems and human service organizations: The needs of managers. Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1069232
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4
Halvorsen, C. J. (2017). Bridging social innovation and social work: Balancing science, values, and speed. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516658353
Hill, A., & Shaw, I. (2011). Social work & ICT. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446269541
Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2015). Innovation attributes and adoption decisions: Perspectives from leaders of a national sample of addiction treatment organizations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 49, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.08.003
Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: The role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.14.157
Lebedyk, L. V. (2021). The application of educational management in the professional training of future specialists in social work. In L. V. Zadoroznaya-Knyagnytska (Ed.), New Ukrainian school: The trajectory of progress (pp. 295–297). Mariupol State University. http://dspace.pnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16913
Melnyk, S., Petrukha, N., Shuprudko, N., Ilychok, B., & Balanutsa, O. (2022). Socio-economic aspects of the impact of military actions on the labor force. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(7), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.7.31
Mialkovska, L., Redchuk, R., Sushyk, I., Martyniuk, Y., Maiboroda, O., & Savchuk, N. (2023a). Social management and digital communications as important components of modern higher education. Cadernos Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 16(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n1.143-152
Mialkovska, L., Herasymchuk, H., Sushyk, I., Martyniuk, Y., Haponchuk, O., & Melnychuk, Y. (2023b). Management models and methods in modern education: Information technologies, sustainability and development. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 16(se2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nse2.94-108
Mosley, J. E. (2020). 10. Social Service Nonprofits: Navigating Conflicting Demands. In W. W. Powell & P. Bromley (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (3rd ed., pp. 251–270). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611085-015
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Mulgan, G. (2012). The theoretical foundations of social innovation. In A. Nicholls & A. Murdock (Eds.), Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets (pp. 33–65). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367098_2
Mulgan, G. (2015). Foreword: The study of social innovation—Theory, practice and progress. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon, & M. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. i–xiv). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50680-1
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation (p. 2). National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf
Rakšnys, A. V., Valickas, A., & Vanagas, R. (2020). Challenges of creation and implementation of collaborative innovations in public sector organisations. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.19.1.25989
Roberson, C. J., & Baker, L. R. (2021). Designing and implementing the use of VR in graduate social work education for clinical practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 39(3), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1915926
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Diffusion-of-Innovations-4th-Edition/Everett-M-Rogers/9781451602470
Rønning, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). Innovation in social welfare and human services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849812
Ryan, D., & Garrett, P. M. (2018). Social work ‘logged on’: Contemporary dilemmas in an evolving ‘technohabitat’. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1278520
Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747537.001.0001
Stoliaryk, O., & Semigina, T. (2022). Focus on optimism and happiness: Psychological foundations for developing the social work clients’ strengths. Social Work and Social Education, 2(9), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.31499/2618-0715.2(9).2022.267333
Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C. (2016). Why novelty is overrated. Journal of Education and Work, 29(6), 728–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1040379
Traube, D. E., Begun, S., Okpych, N., & Choy-Brown, M. (2016). Catalyzing innovation in social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516659140
Trubavina, I., Karaman, O., Kamenova, D., Stepanenko, V., & Yurkiv, Y. (2021). The response strategy of social work with displaced families and the receiving community (within the context of sustainable development). In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 280, p. 04010). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128004010
Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & Garcia Fronti, J. (2017). The three governances in social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537
Yurkiv, Y., & Krasnova, N. (2021). Civil socialization of youth in the conditions of the postmodern information society. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/246
Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2016). The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(5), 884–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12126
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Svitlana Cherneta, Iryna Bychuk, Viktoriia Stepanenko, Andrii Kolosok, Olena Bielkina-Kovalchuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License after publication, allowing the sharing of work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).






