Identification of Corporate Risks not Environmental of Value of Private Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Silvye Ane Massaini FEA-USP
  • Viviane Renata Franco de Oliveira FEA-USP
  • Fábio Lotti Oliva FEA-USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20946/rad.v19i1.23444

Keywords:

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Higher Education Institution, Value System.

Abstract

This paper aims to understand what type of corporate risk can be identified in the value system of private higher education institutions. The study is classified as descriptive and qualitative, based on analysis of interviews with managers of two different private higher education institutions. The results show that the nomenclature and typology of corporate risk is still unclear, considering the perception of the private higher education institutions’ managers. In addition, it was noted that the most evident risk was legal, arising from the relationship with the Ministry of Education; followed by financial risk, caused by evasion and lack of students.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Silvye Ane Massaini, FEA-USP

Mestre em Administração de Empresas pela USP. Especialista em Gestão Estratégica de Projetos pela Faculdade de Administração da FAAP e Bacharel em Administração pela FAAP. Doutoranda em Administração de Empresas pela FEA/USP e professora da FAAP.

Viviane Renata Franco de Oliveira, FEA-USP

Mestre em Administração de Empresas pela USP. Especialista em Vendas e Negociação pela Faculdade de Administração da FAAP e Bacharel em Administração pela FAAP e em História pela USP. Doutoranda em Administração de Empresas pela FEA/USP e professora da FAAP.

Fábio Lotti Oliva, FEA-USP

Livre-Docente pela FEA-USP, onde atua como professor associado. Coordenador de cursos de pós-graduação da Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Massaini, S. A., Franco de Oliveira, V. R., & Oliva, F. L. (2017). Identification of Corporate Risks not Environmental of Value of Private Higher Education Institutions. Management in Dialogue Review, 19(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.20946/rad.v19i1.23444