Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8Keywords:
Origen, Paul, Rufinus, natural law, mosaic law, exegesis, allegoryAbstract
The commentary on the epistle to the Romans by Origen, completely involved with Paul's theology, is the result of the controversies that surrounded him, and it is at the same time an attempt to systematize Paul's writings, since it was believed that Pauline texts contained gaps that needed to be filled and interpreted, in order to make them clearer and more intelligible for any reader. Controversial topics such as the comparison between natural law and mosaic law; literal or spiritual and mystical exegesis; free will and God's omniscience; the pre-existence of the soul, which contributed to Origin's later reputation as a heretic author, highlighted the great moment of the Alexandrine, already in his maturity.
Downloads
Published
2017-08-24
Issue
Section
Intercâmbio
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:- Authors retain copyright, but grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC License.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), as long as with acknowledgment of authorship and first publication in this journal.