SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN BRAZIL PARADOXES AND SOLUTIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2020v11i4p36-52

Keywords:

Sustainable Development, The National Solid Waste Policy, Urban Solid Waste Management, The Great ABC region

Abstract

In Brazil, the National Solid Waste Policy, implemented by the Law 12305/2010, determined the extinction of landfills up to 2014. Were analyzed the Municipal Plans of Integrated Management of Urban Solid Waste, of the seven municipalities from the Great ABC region and actions adopted by the Municipal to perform the Municipal Solid Waste Management. The research is descriptive, using the deductive method, was conducted by a documental analysis of such Plans, in the light of the legislation. The research field was based on interviews with managers responsible for the Urban Solid Waste Management in each studied municipal district. At the end, the following conclusions: selective collection has not yet been deployed as requires the National solid waste Policy and that public managers of the studied municipal districts are favorable to finding solutions Consortium.

 

Author Biographies

Estela Cristina Bonjardim, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul

Advogada, Mestre e Doutora em Administração (USCS, 2017)

Raquel da Silva Pereira, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul

Administradora, Mestre e Doutora em Adminisração pela Pontificia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (2004)

Isabel Cristina Dos Santos, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul

Professora Doutora em Engenharia pela EPUSP (2004), Mestre em Administração pela PUCSP (1999). Administradora (UNIFMU, 1983)

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-01-08

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Papers

License

This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.

1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;

2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);

3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);

4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.