Trajectory of Sustainable Innovation in Brazil
Keywords:Sustainable Innovation, Natural Trajectory, Technological Trajectory
The natural trajectory identifies the direction taken by technological innovation that is influenced by different factors. In the case of sustainable innovation, there are no studies that analyze this dimension in the Brazilian context and, therefore, this study seeks to identify the natural trajectories of this type of innovation based on the patent base of the National Institute of Industrial Property. Data between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed that considered the relationship between patents, gross domestic product, regulation, public policies, educational system, market, technological paradigms and catching-up. It was identified that even in innovations characterized as specific products and that, therefore, tend to exhibit different technological trajectories, the innovations registered as patents in Brazil, have similar natural trajectories, that is, they demonstrate the use of the same set of practices, knowledge and experiences to be produced. In this sense, the study opens possibilities to relate the technological trajectories of patents granted in the country with incrementalism or radicalism in the nature of the innovations that resulted in the analyzed products or processes.
BALKYTE, A.; TVARONAVIČIENE, M. Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: facets of “sustainable competitiveness”. Journal of business economics and management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 341-365, 2010.
BARRAGÁN-OCAÑA, Alejandro; SILVA-BORJAS, Paz; OLMOS-PEÑA, Samuel. Scientific and technological trajectory in the recovery of value-added products from wastewater: A general approach. Journal of Water Process Engineering, p. 101692, 2020.
BELTRÁN-ESTEVE, Mercedes; PICAZO-TADEO, Andrés J. Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up. Energy Policy, v. 104, p. 240-252, 2017.
CARRILLO-HERMOSILLA, Javier; DEL GONZÁLEZ, Pablo Río; KÖNNÖLÄ, Totti. What is eco-innovation? In: Eco-innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2009. p. 6-27.
CASTELLACCI, Fulvio. Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 6-7, p. 978-994, 2008.
CHEN, Yu-Shan; CHANG, Ching-Hsun; LIN, Yu-Hsien. The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: Green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, v. 6, n. 11, p. 7787-7806, 2014.
CHENG, Colin CJ; YANG, Chen-lung; SHEU, Chwen. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 64, p. 81-90, 2014.
CHENG, Colin C.; SHIU, Eric C. Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, v. 32, n. 6, p. 329-344, 2012.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; OVERDORF, Michael. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard business review, v. 78, n. 2, p. 66-77, 2000.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; RAYNOR, Michael E. Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard business review, v. 81, n. 9, p. 66-75, 2003.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; RAYNOR, Michael E.; MCDONALD, Rory. What is disruptive innovation. Harvard business review, v. 93, n. 12, p. 44-53, 2015.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton; RAYNOR, Michael. The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
CHU, Jonathan MWW. Developing and Diffusing Green Technologies: The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights and their Justification. Washington and Lee Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, v. 4, n. 1, p. 53, 2012.
CILLO, Valentina et al. Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 1012-1025, 2019.
CORTEZ, Nathan. Regulating disruptive innovation. Berkeley Tech. LJ, v. 29, p. 175, 2014.
DALENOGARE, Lucas Santos et al. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 204, p. 383-394, 2018.
DAVIDSON, Debra J.; FRICKEL, Scott. Understanding environmental governance: a critical review. Organization & Environment, v. 17, n. 4, p. 471-492, 2004.
DOSI, Giovanni. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, v. 11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982.
DRUCKER, Peter F. The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, v. 76, n. 6, p. 149-157, 1998.
DZHENGIZ, Tulin; NIESTEN, Eva. Competences for environmental sustainability: A systematic review on the impact of absorptive capacity and capabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 162, n. 4, p. 881-906, 2020.
ELKINGTON, John. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 90-100, 1994.
GOLICIC, Susan L.; SMITH, Carlo D. A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of supply chain management, v. 49, n. 2, p. 78-95, 2013.
GOUDA, Sirish Kumar; JONNALAGEDDA, Sreelata; SARANGA, Haritha. Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 248, n. 2, p. 558-570, 2016.
HAFEZI, Maryam; ZOLFAGHARINIA, Hossein. Green product development and environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 204, p. 395-410, 2018.
HART, Stuart L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, v. 20, n. 4, p. 986-1014, 1995.
HART, Stuart L. Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard business review, v. 75, n. 1, p. 66-77, 1997.
HE, Fang et al. Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research: A systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, v. 174, p. 502-526, 2018.
HOJNIK, Jana; RUZZIER, Mitja ; MANOLOVA, Tatiana S. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of cleaner production, v. 171, p. 1312-1323, 2018.
HOJNIK, Jana; RUZZIER, Mitja; MANOLOVA, Tatiana S. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of cleaner production, v. 171, p. 1312-1323, 2018.
HOOGENDOORN, Brigitte; VAN DER ZWAN, Peter; THURIK, Roy. Goal heterogeneity at start-up: are greener start-ups more innovative? Research Policy, v. 49, n. 10, p. 104061, 2020.
HORBACH, Jens. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 163-173, 2008.
HORBACH, Jens. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 163-173, 2008
HÖTTE, Kerstin. How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energy Economics, v. 85, p. 104565, 2020.
KEMP, R., PONTOGLIO, S., (2007). Workshop Conclusions on Typology and Frame-work. Measuring Ecoinnovation (MEI) Project. UNU MERIT, Maastricht.
LEMOS, Maria Carmen; AGRAWAL, Arun. Environmental governance. Annual review of environment and resources, v. 31, 2006.
MATTEN, Dirk; MOON, Jeremy. Reflections on the 2018-decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 7-28, 2020.
MOUSAVI, Seyedesmaeil; BOSSINK, Bart AG. Firms’ capabilities for sustainable innovation: The case of biofuel for aviation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 167, p. 1263-1275, 2017.
NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) Cambridge. MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
NELSON, Richard R.; WINTER, Sidney G. In search of a useful theory of innovation. In: Innovation, economic change and technology policies. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1977. p. 215-245.
O'LEAR, Shannon; BRIGGS, Chad M.; DENNING, G. Michael. Environmental security, military planning, and civilian research: The case of water. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, v. 55, n. 5, p. 3-13, 2013.
RADOSEVIC, S. Benchmarking innovation policy in catching up and emerging economies: methodology for innovation policy index. 2020. WORKING PAPER. UCL CENTRE FOR COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF EMERGENTI ECONMIES.
RUAN, Yi; HANG, Chang Chieh; WANG, Yan Min. Government׳ s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China. Technovation, v. 34, n. 12, p. 785-796, 2014.
SODERSTROM, Sara B.; WEBER, Klaus. Organizational structure from interaction: Evidence from corporate sustainability efforts. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 65, n. 1, p. 226-271, 2020.
SUBRAMANIAM, Mohan; YOUNDT, Mark A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management journal, v. 48, n. 3, p. 450-463, 2005.
TASKIN, Fatma; ZAIM, Osman. Catching-up and innovation in high-and low-income countries. Economics letters, v. 54, n. 1, p. 93-100, 1997.
TRIGUERO, Angela; MORENO-MONDÉJAR, Lourdes; DAVIA, María A. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological economics, v. 92, p. 25-33, 2013.
TUMELERO, Cleonir ; SBRAGIA, Roberto; EVANS, Steve. Cooperation in R&D and ecoinnovations: The role in companies' socioeconomic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production , v. 207, p. 1138-1149, 2019.
VOLLRATH, Dietrich. How important are dual economy effects for aggregate productivity?. Journal of development economics, v. 88, n. 2, p. 325-334, 2009.
Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2018). Government's green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428. https://doi. org/10.1002/smj.2714
YU, Yanni et al. Environmental catching-up, eco-innovation, and technological leadership in China's pilot ecological civilization zones. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 112, p. 228-236, 2016.
ZHANG, Jianming et al. Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 1, p. 39-53, 2020.
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.