TRAJETÓRIA NATURAL DA INOVAÇÃO SUSTENTÁVEL NO BRASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2021v12i3p24-40%20%20%20Palavras-chave:
inovação sustentável, trajetória natural, trajetória tecnológicaResumo
A trajetória natural identifica a direção percorrida pela inovação tecnológica que é influenciada por distintos fatores. No caso da inovação sustentável, não há estudos que analisem esta dimensão no contexto brasileiro e, desta forma, este estudo busca identificar as trajetórias naturais deste tipo de inovação a partir da base de patentes do Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. Foram analisados dados entre 2012 e 2017 que consideraram a relação entre patentes, produto interno bruto, regulação, políticas públicas, sistema educacional, mercado, paradigmas tecnológicos e catching-up. Identificou-se que mesmo em inovações caracterizadas como produtos específicos e que, portanto, tendem a exibir trajetórias tecnológicas distintas, as inovações registradas como patentes no Brasil, possuem trajetórias naturais semelhantes, ou seja, demonstram a utilização do mesmo conjunto de práticas, conhecimentos e experiências para serem produzidas. Neste sentido, o estudo abre possibilidades para se relacionar as trajetórias tecnológicas das patentes concedidas no país com o incrementalismo ou radicalismo na natureza das inovações que resultaram nos produtos ou processos analisados.
Referências
BALKYTE, A.; TVARONAVIČIENE, M. Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: facets of “sustainable competitiveness”. Journal of business economics and management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 341-365, 2010.
BARRAGÁN-OCAÑA, Alejandro; SILVA-BORJAS, Paz; OLMOS-PEÑA, Samuel. Scientific and technological trajectory in the recovery of value-added products from wastewater: A general approach. Journal of Water Process Engineering, p. 101692, 2020.
BELTRÁN-ESTEVE, Mercedes; PICAZO-TADEO, Andrés J. Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up. Energy Policy, v. 104, p. 240-252, 2017.
CARRILLO-HERMOSILLA, Javier; DEL GONZÁLEZ, Pablo Río; KÖNNÖLÄ, Totti. What is eco-innovation? In: Eco-innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2009. p. 6-27.
CASTELLACCI, Fulvio. Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 6-7, p. 978-994, 2008.
CHEN, Yu-Shan; CHANG, Ching-Hsun; LIN, Yu-Hsien. The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: Green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, v. 6, n. 11, p. 7787-7806, 2014.
CHENG, Colin CJ; YANG, Chen-lung; SHEU, Chwen. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 64, p. 81-90, 2014.
CHENG, Colin C.; SHIU, Eric C. Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, v. 32, n. 6, p. 329-344, 2012.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; OVERDORF, Michael. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard business review, v. 78, n. 2, p. 66-77, 2000.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; RAYNOR, Michael E. Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard business review, v. 81, n. 9, p. 66-75, 2003.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M.; RAYNOR, Michael E.; MCDONALD, Rory. What is disruptive innovation. Harvard business review, v. 93, n. 12, p. 44-53, 2015.
CHRISTENSEN, Clayton; RAYNOR, Michael. The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
CHU, Jonathan MWW. Developing and Diffusing Green Technologies: The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights and their Justification. Washington and Lee Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, v. 4, n. 1, p. 53, 2012.
CILLO, Valentina et al. Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 1012-1025, 2019.
CORTEZ, Nathan. Regulating disruptive innovation. Berkeley Tech. LJ, v. 29, p. 175, 2014.
DALENOGARE, Lucas Santos et al. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 204, p. 383-394, 2018.
DAVIDSON, Debra J.; FRICKEL, Scott. Understanding environmental governance: a critical review. Organization & Environment, v. 17, n. 4, p. 471-492, 2004.
DOSI, Giovanni. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, v. 11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982.
DRUCKER, Peter F. The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, v. 76, n. 6, p. 149-157, 1998.
DZHENGIZ, Tulin; NIESTEN, Eva. Competences for environmental sustainability: A systematic review on the impact of absorptive capacity and capabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 162, n. 4, p. 881-906, 2020.
ELKINGTON, John. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 90-100, 1994.
GOLICIC, Susan L.; SMITH, Carlo D. A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of supply chain management, v. 49, n. 2, p. 78-95, 2013.
GOUDA, Sirish Kumar; JONNALAGEDDA, Sreelata; SARANGA, Haritha. Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 248, n. 2, p. 558-570, 2016.
HAFEZI, Maryam; ZOLFAGHARINIA, Hossein. Green product development and environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 204, p. 395-410, 2018.
HART, Stuart L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, v. 20, n. 4, p. 986-1014, 1995.
HART, Stuart L. Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard business review, v. 75, n. 1, p. 66-77, 1997.
HE, Fang et al. Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research: A systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, v. 174, p. 502-526, 2018.
HOJNIK, Jana; RUZZIER, Mitja ; MANOLOVA, Tatiana S. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of cleaner production, v. 171, p. 1312-1323, 2018.
HOJNIK, Jana; RUZZIER, Mitja; MANOLOVA, Tatiana S. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of cleaner production, v. 171, p. 1312-1323, 2018.
HOOGENDOORN, Brigitte; VAN DER ZWAN, Peter; THURIK, Roy. Goal heterogeneity at start-up: are greener start-ups more innovative? Research Policy, v. 49, n. 10, p. 104061, 2020.
HORBACH, Jens. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 163-173, 2008.
HORBACH, Jens. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 163-173, 2008
HÖTTE, Kerstin. How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energy Economics, v. 85, p. 104565, 2020.
KEMP, R., PONTOGLIO, S., (2007). Workshop Conclusions on Typology and Frame-work. Measuring Ecoinnovation (MEI) Project. UNU MERIT, Maastricht.
LEMOS, Maria Carmen; AGRAWAL, Arun. Environmental governance. Annual review of environment and resources, v. 31, 2006.
MATTEN, Dirk; MOON, Jeremy. Reflections on the 2018-decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 7-28, 2020.
MOUSAVI, Seyedesmaeil; BOSSINK, Bart AG. Firms’ capabilities for sustainable innovation: The case of biofuel for aviation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 167, p. 1263-1275, 2017.
NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) Cambridge. MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
NELSON, Richard R.; WINTER, Sidney G. In search of a useful theory of innovation. In: Innovation, economic change and technology policies. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1977. p. 215-245.
O'LEAR, Shannon; BRIGGS, Chad M.; DENNING, G. Michael. Environmental security, military planning, and civilian research: The case of water. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, v. 55, n. 5, p. 3-13, 2013.
RADOSEVIC, S. Benchmarking innovation policy in catching up and emerging economies: methodology for innovation policy index. 2020. WORKING PAPER. UCL CENTRE FOR COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF EMERGENTI ECONMIES.
RUAN, Yi; HANG, Chang Chieh; WANG, Yan Min. Government׳ s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China. Technovation, v. 34, n. 12, p. 785-796, 2014.
SODERSTROM, Sara B.; WEBER, Klaus. Organizational structure from interaction: Evidence from corporate sustainability efforts. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 65, n. 1, p. 226-271, 2020.
SUBRAMANIAM, Mohan; YOUNDT, Mark A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management journal, v. 48, n. 3, p. 450-463, 2005.
TASKIN, Fatma; ZAIM, Osman. Catching-up and innovation in high-and low-income countries. Economics letters, v. 54, n. 1, p. 93-100, 1997.
TRIGUERO, Angela; MORENO-MONDÉJAR, Lourdes; DAVIA, María A. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological economics, v. 92, p. 25-33, 2013.
TUMELERO, Cleonir ; SBRAGIA, Roberto; EVANS, Steve. Cooperation in R&D and ecoinnovations: The role in companies' socioeconomic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production , v. 207, p. 1138-1149, 2019.
VOLLRATH, Dietrich. How important are dual economy effects for aggregate productivity?. Journal of development economics, v. 88, n. 2, p. 325-334, 2009.
Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2018). Government's green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428. https://doi. org/10.1002/smj.2714
YU, Yanni et al. Environmental catching-up, eco-innovation, and technological leadership in China's pilot ecological civilization zones. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 112, p. 228-236, 2016.
ZHANG, Jianming et al. Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 1, p. 39-53, 2020.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
