The role of Memes in the communication process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i2p60-76Keywords:
Memetics, Communication, Strategic memes, Material memes, Memetic field, Agency, Evolution, IntersubjectivityAbstract
Memetics, as a scientific framework for cultural evolution, must be integrated into the communication process to remain viable. This paper explores whether communication is better explained through memes and whether memes act as autonomous agents. While communication can be understood without memetics, applying a memetic framework offers deeper heuristic insights into communicative phenomena. By examining concepts such as news, meaning, language, reading, listening, writing, silence, lateral thinking, and teaching, this paper demonstrates that memetic fields structure and reshape communication. Drawing from thought experiments and interdisciplinary references, it argues that memes actively reconstruct their environment, making them more than passive replicators. Additionally, the study extends McLuhan’s “medium is the message” thesis to social media, where user-generated submedia function as memetic ecosystems that redefine intersubjectivity. The analysis raises an evolutionary question: are humans the agents of memes, or are memes the true agents of cultural evolution? While full validation of memetic agency remains open, this paper advances a model in which memes influence, constrain, and direct human cognition in ways previously unexplored.
References
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. 2018. The Summa Theologica: Complete Edition. barthes: Coyote Canyon Press.
Aunger, Robert. 2002. The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think. New York: Free Press.
Barthes, Roland. 1967. The Death of the Author. Aspen 5–6.
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. 1st edition. Northvale: Jason Aronson Inc.
Breivik, Jarle. 2001a. Don’t Stop for Repairs in a War Zone: Darwinian Evolution Unites Genes and Environment in Cancer Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (10): 5379–81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101137698.
Breivik, Jarle. 2001b. ‘Self-Organization of Template-Replicating Polymers and the Spontaneous Rise of Genetic Information’. Entropy 3 (4): 273–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/e3040273.
Breivik, Jarle. 2023. Making Sense of Cancer: From Its Evolutionary Origin to Its Societal Impact and the Ultimate Solution. River Grove Books.
Cochrane, Ethan. 2011. Units of Transmission in Evolutionary Archaeology and the Role of Memetics. In Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies. Left Coast Press. https://www.academia.edu/705359/Units_of_Transmission_in_Evolutionary_Archaeology_and_the_Role_of_Memetics?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper.
Corbin, Alain. 2018. A History of Silence: From the Renaissance to the Present Day. Translated by Jean Birrell. 1st edition. Medford, MA: Polity.
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New ed. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Back Bay Books. Little, Brown.
Drapal, Andrej. 2022. Homonism. Scholars’ Press. https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/homonism/isbn/978-613-8-96091-1.
Einstein, Albert. 1905. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. 1st edition. Samaira Book Publishers.
Falster, Daniel S., Sigve Nakken, Marie Bergem-Ohr, Einar Andreas Rødland, and Jarle Breivik. 2010. Unstable DNA Repair Genes Shaped by Their Own Sequence Modifying Phenotypes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 70 (3): 266–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-010-9328-0.
Haig, David. 2020. From Darwin to Derrida: Selfish Genes, Social Selves, and the Meanings of Life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 2010. Govorice: kako se rodijo? Kako krožijo? Kdo jih vrže med ljudi? Jih lahko utišamo? : [najstarejši vir informacij]. Translated by Agata Tomažič. 1. izd. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.
King, Peter. 1998. Augustine on the Impossibility of Teaching. Metaphilosophy 29 (3): 179–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00090.
Kumar, Manjit. 2009. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality. Icon Books.
Mandelbrot, Benoit B. 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Henry Holt and Company.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. PDF. https://www.abebooks.com/9780262631594/Understanding-Media-Extensions-Man-Marshall-0262631598/plp.
Plato. n.d. Phaedrus. Accessed 12 February 2022. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1636/1636-h/1636-h.htm.
Shannon, C.E. 1948. ‘The Mathematical Theory of Communication’. M.D. Computing : Computers in Medical Practice 14:306–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2014. Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. Reprint edition. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
Watts, Alan. 1950. Just So: An Odyssey Into the Cosmic Web of Connection, Play, and True Pleasure. Sounds True / Unabridged edition. Sounds True.
Wolf, Maryanne. 2018. Reader, Come Home. https://www.audible.com/pd/Reader-Come-Home-Audiobook/B07DFPF554.
Xu, Xiaowen, and Jordan Peterson. 2017. Differences in Media Preference Mediate the Link Between Personality and Political Orientation. Political Psychology 38 (1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12307.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.