Unlocking Global Innovation

Leveraging Non-Parametric Analytics with Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Insights on External Factors

Autores/as

  • Elangovan Narayanan University Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Wan Rosmanira Ismail Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Zainol Mustafa University Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2024v15i3p107-131

Palabras clave:

Innovation efficiency, Nonparametric analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis, Tobit, External factors

Resumen

In the dynamic landscape of global innovation, researchers increasingly adopt an integrated approach using nonparametric and regression techniques. This study highlights the significance of this method in enabling countries to understand external factors shaping innovation outcomes. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) serves as a robust framework for evaluating innovation efficiency, helping countries optimize their innovation processes by scrutinizing resource utilization and identifying areas for improvement. Complementing DEA, Tobit regression analysis offers insights into the nuanced influence of external drivers on innovation. The findings reveal a mixed landscape: while high-income countries dominate innovation efficiency, some lower-middle and low-income countries show notable proficiency. China, classified as an upper-middle-income country, emerges as the most referenced benchmark. Based on benchmarking, inefficient countries can enhance their innovation policies and strategies, helping to bridge the global innovation gap. Despite all input capabilities showing a negative correlation with innovation efficiency, all output variables exhibit a positive correlation. Notably, there was no association between R&D and innovation efficiency in 2020, highlighting the need for judicious use of innovation inputs to avoid wastage. Additionally, the Tobit regression model exhibits a remarkable R-squared value of 0.8523, indicating that the 16 independent factors account for 85.23% of the variation in the innovation efficiency. Amidst technology-driven transformations, leveraging nonparametric analysis methodologies is essential for organizations aiming to thrive in the global innovation arena. This study highlights the crucial role of DEA in assessing innovation efficiency and emphasizes the importance of incorporating nonparametric analysis and regression techniques into strategic decision-making processes to formulate effective innovation policies.

Citas

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2016). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ijmr.12063.

Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2005). Entry and productivity growth: Evidence from microlevel panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2-3), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.274

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2013). Innovation Strategies for Sustainable Development: National Policies and International Cooperation. Research Policy, 42(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.007

Alam, K. M., Xuemei, L., Baig, S., Yadong, L., & Shah, A., A. (2020). Analysis of technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies of Pakistan railways using data envelopment analysis and Tobit regression model. Networks and Spatial Economics, 20, 989-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-020-09510-9

Anderson, H. J., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Diffusion efficiency of innovation among EU member states: a data envelopment analysis. Economies, 7:34. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/economies 7020034

Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L., Pastor, J. T., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. (2020). Introducing cross productivity: A new approach for ranking productive units over time in Data Envelopment Analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106058

Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 1:26(2), 324-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002

Barros, M., Galea, M., Leiva, V., & Santos-Neto, M. (2018). Generalized Tobit models: Diagnostics and application in econometrics. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2:45(1), 145-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1268572

Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 1:46(7), 1284-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012

Bloom, N., Bond, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Uncertainty and investment dynamics. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00426.x

Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020). Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.36

Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119

Büchel, F., & Pannenberg, M. (2020). Education, Innovation and Growth: The Role of Education Quality for Innovation Efficiency. Working Paper No. 23, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition.

Casali, L. V., Power, D., & Scott, N. W. (2021). Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Open Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 128, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.028

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Chen, J., & Malhotra, N. (2009). Evaluating Innovation Efficiency: Application of DEA and Tobit Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11123-008-0114-4

Choi, H., & Zo, H. (2019). Assessing the efficiency of national innovation systems in developing countries. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1093 /scipol/scz005

Coe, A., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (2020). International R&D spillovers and institutions. Journal of International Economics, 122, 103289. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.euroecorev.2009.02.005

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev. 2009.02.005

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2393553

Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software (2nd ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29122-9

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software (2nd ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8

Crescenzi, L., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). Innovation Efficiency in European Regions: The Role of R&D and Other Regional Characteristics. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0251-x

De, D., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (2020). Impact of lean and sustainability oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium sized enterprises: a data envelopment analysis-based framework. International Journal of Production Economics. 1:219, 416-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.003

Dobrzanski, P., Bobowski, S., Chrysostome, E., Velinov, E., & Strouhal, J. (2021). Toward Innovation-Driven Competitiveness Across African Countries: An Analysis of Efficiency of R&D Expenditures. Journal of Competitiveness. 13(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.01.01

Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2020) . Global innovation index 2020. Johnson Cornell University . https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020_ exec.pdf

Edler, J., & Slater, S. A. (2019). R&D and Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from European Countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 671-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9692-0

Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Barbero, J., & Zofío, J. L. (2018). On the meaning of innovation performance: Is the synthetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed? Research Evaluation, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy011

Fang, S., Xue, X., Yin, G., Fang, H., Li., J, & Zhang, Y. (2020). Evaluation and improvement of technological innovation efficiency of new energy vehicle enterprises in China based on DEA-Tobit model. Sustainability, 11:12(18):7509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12187509

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General). 120(3), 253-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, S. S. (2008). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195183528.001.0001

Gallouj, M. P., & Gallouj, F. (2018). Innovation and Sustainable Development: Linking Innovation Systems and Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.244

GÜNERİ, Ö., İ,, & DURMUŞ, B. (2020). Dependent dummy variable models: An application of logit, probit and tobit models on survey data. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering. 31:6(1), 63-74. https://dergipark. org.tr/en/pub/ijcesen/issue/51113/666512#article_cite

Hall, B. H., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2

Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic Development as Self-Discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

Jiang, L., Jiang, Y., Wu, Z., Liao, D., & Xu, R. (2015). The measurement of innovation efficiency of Chinese high-tech industry using data envelopment analysis. Acta Oeconomica, 65(s2):101-13. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.65.2015.s2.8

Jones, B. F., & Summers, L. H. (2018). Innovation Productivity and Firm Size Distribution: Evidence from High-Income Countries. Research Policy, 47(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.016

Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 1:61(3), 453-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011

Kleinknecht, A., & Verspagen, B. (2012). Innovation Efficiency and External Factors: Integrating DEA and Tobit Analysis. Research Policy, 41(2), 254-265. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.004

Kline, S.J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986) An Overview of Innovation. In: Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N., Eds., The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 275-307.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.3.3.383

Kohtamäki, M., Puumalainen, K., Pöyry, H., & Kuusisto, S. (2020). Innovation Management and Firm Competitiveness: The Moderating Role of Strategic Orientations. Technovation, 96-97, 102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102138

Kou, M., Chen, K., Wang, S., & Shao, Y. (2016). Measuring efficiencies of multi-period and multi-division systems associated with DEA: An application to OECD countries’ national innovation systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 46(C), 494-510. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.032

Lafarga, C. V., & Balderrama, J. I. (2015). Efficiency of Mexico's regional innovation systems: an evaluation applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 1:7(1), 36-44. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ EJC166897

Mazzucato, M., & Perez, C. (2015). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Research Policy, 44(4), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.019

Minniti, M., & Naudé, W. (2010). What do we know about the patterns and determinants of female entrepreneurship across countries? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.12691/jbe-2-4-1

Morgan, K., & Nauwelaers, C. (2009). National Innovation Systems and the Role of Government in Fostering Innovation. Technovation, 29(6-7), 424-432. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.12.003

Mujasi, P., N., Asbu, E., Z., & Puig-Junoy, J. (2016). How efficient are referral hospitals in Uganda? A data envelopment analysis and tobit regression approach. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1472-9

Murillo-Zamorano, L. R. (2004). Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(1), 33-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x

Narayanan, E., Ismail, W. R., & Mustafa, Z. (2022). A data-envelopment analysis-based systematic review of the literature on innovation performance. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11925

Narula, R., & Kraak, A. T. (2021). External Constraints on Innovation in Developing Economies. World Development, 138, 105269. https://doi.org/1016/j.worlddev.2020.105269

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Odah, M., H., Bager, A., S., & Mohammed, B., K. (2017). Tobit regression analysis applied on Iraqi bank loans. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 7(4), 179-82. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajms.20170704.06

Ørngreen, R., & Levinsen, K. T. (2017). Workshops as a research methodology. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 15(1), 70-81. http://ejel.org/volume15/issue1

Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center. https://www.euacademic.org/BookUpload/9.pdf

Park, Y. S., Lim, S. H., Egilmez, G. & Szmerekovsky, J. (2016). Environmental efficiency assessment of US transport sector: A slack-based data envelopment analysis approach. Transport Research. D Transport and Environment, 61, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trd.2016.09.009

Philpott, S. J. P., & Kshetri, N. (2019). Frugal Innovation and Its Implementation in Emerging Economies: A Comparative Study of India and Indonesia. Technovation, 80, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.12.002

Prokop, V., Hajek, P., & Stejskal, J. (2021). Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168(C), 120787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120787

Radicic, D., & Pugh, M. (2017). Barriers to Innovation and Firm Productivity: Evidence from European Countries. Journal of Business Research, 80. 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.018

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2016). External Factors Affecting Innovation: A Meta-Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 234-242. https://doi.org/1016/ j.techfore.2015.07.010

Schot J, & Steinmueller, W., E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. SPRU Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex: Brighton, UK. https://www.johanschot.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Framing-Innovation-Policy-for-Transformative-Change-Innovation-Policy-3.0-2016.pdf

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of research in innovative teaching & learning, 3:10(1), 4-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49

Simar, L., & Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009

Smith, J., & Johnson, E. (2021). Non-Parametric Analysis in Sustaining Innovation Excellence: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Innovation Management, 27(4), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500289

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 1:104, 333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Soete, L., & Freeman, C. (2010). Assessing Innovation Efficiency in European Regions: A DEA-Tobit Approach. Omega, 38(3-4), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2009.08.004

Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047

Svejnar, J., & Munich, D. (2010). R&D and Innovation Efficiency in Transition Economies: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802564545

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2

Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1407-7

Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382

Tone, K., Toloo, M., & Izadikhah, M. (2020). A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 560-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.019

UNDP. (2001). United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2001: Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2001

Vechkinzova, E., Petrenko, Y., Benčič, S., Ulybyshev, D., & Zhailauov, Y. (2019). Evaluation of regional innovation systems performance using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 1:7(1), 498-509. http://doi.org/ 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(35)

Vivarelli, M. (2017). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480106

von Hippel, P. T. (2005). Mean, Median, and Skew: Correcting a Textbook Rule. Journal of Statistics Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2005.11910556

Wang, Q., Hang, Y., Sun, L., & Zhao, Z. (2016). Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1:112, 254-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.019

Werker, E., Pritchett, L., & Sen, K. (2017). Innovation and Economic Development: Evidence from Low-Income Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 125, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.005

Zemtsov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2019). An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: the application of the DEA approach. Scientometrics. 15:120(2), 375-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y

Zeng, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Ren, J. (2021). Innovation efficiency: a bibliometric review and future research agenda. Asia Pacific Business Review. 27(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13602381.2021.1858591

Zhang, J. (2020). Tobit regression analysis of technological innovation efficiency and influencing factors in high-tech industries. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1552(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2020.020108

Zhong, K., Li, C., & Wang, Q. (2021). Evaluation of bank innovation efficiency with data envelopment analysis: From the perspective of uncovering the black box between input and output. Mathematics. 209(24):3318. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243318

Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G.Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216674457

Zhu, J. (2014). Slack-Based DEA Models, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, Edition, 3(5):93-101. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06647-9_5

Descargas

Publicado

2024-11-27

Número

Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2024): Journal on Innovation and Sustainability

Sección

Papers

Licencia

This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.

1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;

2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);

3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);

4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.