GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA E DESEMPENHO DA EMPRESA: EVIDÊNCIAS DE EMPRESAS LISTADAS DO PAQUISTÃO

Autores

  • Shuaib Ali Zhongnan University of economics and Law, Wuhan
  • Guo Fei School of Accounting Zhongnan university of economics and law
  • Zahid Ali Department of Management sciences and Commerce University of Malakand Pakistan
  • Farhan Hussain Zhongnan university of economics and law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2021v12i1p170-187

Palavras-chave:

Problemas de Agência, Governança Corporativa, Concentração de Propriedade, Independência do Conselho

Resumo

Este estudo tem como objetivo verificar a influência da governança corporativa no desempenho da empresa para as empresas não financeiras listadas na Bolsa de Valores do Paquistão (PSX) para o período de 2005-15. O artigo mediu a governança corporativa pelos grandes conselhos com mais conselheiros independentes, independência do comitê de auditoria, concentração de propriedade, inexistência de dualidade de CEO e presença de investidores estrangeiros e institucionais. Para abordar essa natureza endógena de propriedade e desempenho institucional neste estudo, usamos técnicas de variáveis instrumentais (IV) usando um mínimo de dois estágios (2SLS), instrumentalizando a propriedade institucional com o tamanho e a idade da empresa. O estudo constatou que empresas com conselhos grandes e independentes superam suas contrapartes. Da mesma forma, o estudo descobriu que as empresas que têm a posição conjunta de CEO e presidente do conselho têm desempenho inferior ao das contrapartes. No Paquistão, as empresas com proprietários estrangeiros e institucionais são melhores do que outras. Descobrimos que as empresas com proprietários concentrados têm um nível mais baixo de problemas de agência e, em última análise, apresentam um bom desempenho. Além disso, descobrimos que as empresas com um nível mais baixo de problema de agência do tipo II (medido por meio da contestabilidade da concentração de propriedade) apresentam melhor desempenho no Paquistão.

 

Biografia do Autor

Shuaib Ali, Zhongnan University of economics and Law, Wuhan

PhD Scholar, School of Acounting.

Guo Fei, School of Accounting Zhongnan university of economics and law

Professor School of Accounting

Zahid Ali, Department of Management sciences and Commerce University of Malakand Pakistan

Lecturer Department of Mangment Sciences and commerce

Farhan Hussain, Zhongnan university of economics and law

Master Scholar School of Accounting

Referências

AGARWAL, V., DANIEL, N. D. & NAIK, N. Y. 2005. Role of managerial incentives, flexibility, and ability: Evidence from performance and money flows in hedge funds. Flexibility, and Ability: Evidence from Performance and Money Flows in Hedge Funds (March 15, 2005).

AGRAWAL, A. & KNOEBER, C. R. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 377-397.

AGRAWAL, A. & NASSER, T. 2018. Corporate Financial and Investment Policies in the Presence of a Blockholder on the Board. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 8, 1850012.

AGYEMANG-MINTAH, P. 2016. Remuneration committee governance and firm performance in UK financial firms. Investment management and financial innovations, 176-190.

AHIADORME, J. W., GYEKE-DAKO, A. & ABOR, J. Y. 2018. Debt holdings and investment cash flow sensitivity of listed firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets.

AL‐NAJJAR, B. 2015. The Effect of Governance Mechanisms on Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Cash Holdings: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 303-320.

BAXTER, P. & COTTER, J. 2009. Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting & Finance, 49, 267-290.

BHAGAT, S., CAREY, D. C. & ELSON, C. M. 1999. Director ownership, corporate performance, and management turnover. The Business Lawyer, 885-919.

CHEN, Y.-F., WANG, Y.-W., HUANG, W.-S., Lee, M.-M., WOOD, W. G., LEUNG, Y.-M. & TSAI, H.-Y. 2016. Trans-cinnamaldehyde, an essential oil in cinnamon powder, ameliorates cerebral ischemia-induced brain injury via inhibition of neuroinflammation through attenuation of iNOS, COX-2 expression and NFκ-B signaling pathway. Neuromolecular medicine, 18, 322-333.

CHHIBBER, P. K. & MAJUMDAR, S. K. 1999. Foreign ownership and profitability: Property rights, control, and the performance of firms in the Indian industry. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 209-238.

CORNETT, D. S., REYZER, M. L., CHAURAND, P. & CAPRIOLI, R. M. 2007. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nature methods, 4, 828-833.

DEMSETZ, H. & LEHN, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93, 1155-1177.

DETTHAMRONG, U., CHANCHARAT, N. & VITHESSONTHI, C. 2017. Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 689-709.

EARLE, J. S., KUCSERA, C. & TELEGDY, Á. 2005. Ownership concentration and corporate performance on the Budapest stock exchange: Do too many cooks spoil the goulash? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 254-264.

EISENBERG, T., SUNDGREN, S. & WELLS, M. T. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of financial economics, 48, 35-54.

ELMAGRHI, M. H., NTIM, C. G. & WANG, Y. 2016. Antecedents of voluntary corporate governance disclosure: A post-2007/08 financial crisis evidence from the influential UK Combined Code. Corporate Governance.

ELYASIANI, E. & JIA, J. 2010. Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance. Journal of banking & finance, 34, 606-620.

FALEYE, O., KOVACS, T. & VENKATESWARAN, A. 2014. Do better-connected CEOs innovate more? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49, 1201-1225.

FAN, D. K., LAU, C.-M. & YOUNG, M. 2007. Is China's corporate governance beginning to come of age? The case of CEO turnover. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 15, 105-120.

FERREIRA, M. A. & MATOS, P. 2008. When banks are insiders: Evidence from the global syndicated loan market.

GEERTZ-HANSEN, O., SAND-JENSEN, K., HANSEN, D. F. & CHRISTIANSEN, A. 1993. Growth and grazing control of abundance of the marine macroalga, Ulva lactuca L. in a eutrophic Danish estuary. Aquatic Botany, 46, 101-109.

GLIGORIC, M., GROCE, A., ZHANG, C., SHARMA, R., ALIPOUR, M. A. & MARINOV, D. Comparing non-adequate test suites using coverage criteria. Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, 2013. 302-313.

GOMPERS, P. A. & METRICK, A. 2001. Institutional investors and equity prices. The quarterly journal of Economics, 116, 229-259.

HANDRIANI, E. & ROBIYANTO, R. 2018. Corporate finance and firm value in the Indonesian manufacturing companies. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 11, 113-127.

HANIFFA, R. & HUDAIB, M. 2006. Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33, 1034-1062.

HARDT, U. 2018. Kommunale Finanzkraft, Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.

HASSAN, R., MARIMUTHU, M. & KAUR JOHL, S. 2016. Women on boards and market performance: An exploratory study on the listed companies.

HOLDERNESS, C. G. & SHEEHAN, D. P. 1988. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 317-346.

HOVEY, M., LI, L. & NAUGHTON, T. 2003. The relationship between valuation and ownership of listed firms in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 112-122.

IQBAL, S., NAWAZ, A. & EHSAN, S. 2019. Financial performance and corporate governance in microfinance: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 60, 1-13.

IWASAKI, I., MA, X. & MIZOBATA, S. 2019. Corporate ownership and managerial turnover in China and Eastern Europe: A comparative meta-analysis.

JACKLING, B. & JOHL, S. 2009. Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 492-509.

JAFARINEJAD, M., JORY, S. R. & NGO, T. N. 2015. The effects of institutional ownership on the value and risk of diversified firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 207-219.

JENSEN, M. 1976. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, 22.

JOHNSON, S., KAUFMANN, D., SHLEIFER, A., GOLDMAN, M. I. & WEITZMAN, M. L. 1997. The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1997, 159-239.

KLEIN, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 275-304.

KLEIN, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of accounting and economics, 33, 375-400.

KRAUSE, R., SEMADENI, M. & CANNELLA JR, A. A. 2014. CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40, 256-286.

KUKAH, M. A., AMIDU, M. & ABOR, J. Y. 2016. Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting information quality of listed firms in Ghana. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5, 38-58.

KUMAR, P. & ZATTONI, A. 2016. Institutional environment and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 82-84.

KUSUMA, H. & AYUMARDANI, A. 2016. The corporate governance efficiency and Islamic bank performance: an Indonesian evidence. Polish journal of management studies, 13, 111--120.

LEECH, D. & LEAHY, J. 1991. Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. The Economic Journal, 101, 1418-1437.

LIPTON, M. & LORSCH, J. W. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The business lawyer, 59-77.

LUEDKE, C. L. 2017. Person first, student second: Staff and administrators of color supporting students of color authentically in higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 58, 37-52.

MARDNLY, Z., MOUSELLI, S. & ABDULRAOUF, R. 2018. Corporate governance and firm performance: an empirical evidence from Syria. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management.

MARTINS, É. D. S., OLIVEIRA, C. G. D., RESENDE, Á. V. D. & MATOS, M. S. F. D. 2008. Agrominerais-Rochas silicáticas como fontes minerais alternativas de potássio para a agricultura. CETEM/MCTI.

MAYUR, M. & SARAVANAN, P. 2005. Does the board size really matter? An empirical investigation on the Indian banking sector. An Empirical Investigation on the Indian Banking Sector (December 16, 2005).

MEMON, J. A., FEI, G., SHAIQUE, M., USMAN, M. & NAZIR, M. I. 2019. MODERATING INFLUENCE OF AUDIT QUALITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP AND ACCOUNTING CONSERVATISM: IN PAKISTANI LISTED FIRMS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM GMM TECHNIQUE. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7, 2020.

MUBEEN, R., HAN, D., ABBAS, J. & HUSSAIN, I. 2020. The Effects of Market Competition, Capital Structure, and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Mediation Analysis by Incorporating the GMM Model Technique. Sustainability, 12, 3480.

MUNIANDY, B. & HILLIER, J. 2015. Board independence, investment opportunity set and performance of South African firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 108-124.

MYERS, S. C. 1984. Capital structure puzzle. National Bureau of Economic Research.

NASHIER, T. & GUPTA, A. 2020. Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in India. Global Business Review, 0972150919894395.

PAN, Z., FENG, Y., LU, Y.-T., LIN, Y.-F., HUNG, T.-P., HSU, F.-C. & LIANG, S. Y. 2017. Force modeling of Inconel 718 laser-assisted end milling under recrystallization effects. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92, 2965-2974.

RAHMAN, M. M., MEAH, M. R. & CHAUDHORY, N. U. 2019. The impact of audit characteristics on firm performance: an empirical study from an emerging economy. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 6, 59-69.

SCHWARZ-HERION, O., OMRAN, A. & RAPP, H. P. 2008. A case study on successful municipal solid waste management in industrialized countries by the example of Karlsruhe city, Germany. J Engineering Annals of Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, 5, 266-273.

SHAH, N. & NAPIER, C. J. 2017. The Cadbury Report 1992: Shared Vision and Beyond. United Kingdom.

SHAHAR, H. K., ADZIS, A. A. & BADERI, N. 2016. The relationship between ownership structure, firm specific characteristics and capital Structure: Evidence from Malaysian middle-capital public listed firms. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6.

SPIRA, L. F. & PAGE, M. 2003. Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

SRIDHARAN, S. & JOSHI, M. 2018. Impact of Ownership Patterns and Firm Life‐Cycle Stages on Firm Performance: Evidence From India. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29, 117-136.

TING, I. W. K., KWEH, Q. L. & LO, H.-C. OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION AND R&D INVESTMENTS? VARIATIONS BROUGHT BY FAMILY CONTROL IN TAIWAN.

VANIA, I., WIJANTINI, W. & YULIATI, R. Andriyani Surjadi.

VU, V. T. T., PHAN, N. T. & DANG, H. N. 2020. Impacts of Ownership Structure on Systemic Risk of Listed Companies in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7, 107-117.

WRUCK, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial economics, 23, 3-28.

ZANDI, G., TAIB, F. M. & IBRAHIM, D. N. 2017. Determinants of corporate governance characteristics influencing price and non-price informative voluntary disclosures: evidence from Iran. AJBA, 3.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-04-12

Edição

Seção

Artigos