Sistema de organização mundial do comércio
sincronização do nexo jurídico entre comércio mercantil e proteção ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2022v13i1p32-43Palavras-chave:
Organização Mundial do Comércio, comércio, meio ambiente, coordenaçãoResumo
No mundo de hoje, o desenvolvimento sustentável se tornou o consenso da comunidade internacional. Com o desenvolvimento e o progresso da economia mundial e o lançamento da onda de proteção ambiental no mundo, o comércio de mercado e as questões de proteção ambiental ganharam gradualmente a atenção total de departamentos governamentais e pessoas em muitos países ao redor do mundo, e gradualmente evoluíram para uma das questões centrais nos campos político, econômico e multissetorial globais. As leis e regulamentos sobre proteção ambiental adotados por organizações internacionais e países e as regras básicas do comércio de mercado constituem a base para a aplicação da supervisão de controle ambiental. Os pesquisadores adotaram uma busca sistemática online para identificar artigos de periódicos, relatórios e outros documentos relevantes relacionados ao comércio de mercado e proteção ambiental. A busca online foi feita principalmente no Google, Google Scholar e Bing para recuperar documentos relacionados ao comércio de mercado e proteção ambiental. O estudo desvendou uma relação complexa entre o comércio de mercado e a proteção ambiental, e a comunidade internacional tem prestado muita atenção. A política de comércio exterior visa evitar o desenvolvimento de um novo programa de implementação e restrição ao comércio de mercado, proteger o comércio de mercado, eliminar as barreiras existentes ao comércio de mercado, restringir as leis e regulamentos de comércio de mercado e, finalmente, alcançar a maneira de aumentar a eficácia do comércio de mercado . Portanto, a proteção ambiental e o comércio de mercado são dois sistemas, e é uma contradição central obedecer aos quais os princípios fundamentais são observados. Para resolver e lidar com a relação entre o comércio de mercado e o meio ambiente, ele deve redefinir os fatores de influência relevantes nesses dois sistemas. Os pesquisadores sugeriram que, por meio da coordenação da gestão, deveria haver um estudo cuidadoso da experiência de organizações relevantes, como a União Europeia, NAFTA, OCDE e, em seguida, apresentar ideias específicas para a gestão coordenada.
Referências
Ahmed, A., & Mustofa, J. (2016). Role of soft law in environmental protection: an overview. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 4(2), 1-18.
Al- Fatlawi, S. H. (2018). International Journal of Asian Social Science NATIONALISTS AND ENVIRONMENTALISTS WHICH ARE ANTI- GLOBALIZATION AND THE WTO Keywords. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(5), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.85.256.264
Alola, A. A. (2019). The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability. Science of the Total Environment, 658(1), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212
Araujo, B. A. M. (2016). The EU deep trade agenda: Law and policy. Oxford University Press.
Aseeva, A. (2018). ( Un ) Sustainable Development ( s ) in International Economic Law : A Quest for Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 4022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114022
Barrett, A., Lawlor, J., & Scott, S. (2019). The fiscal system and the polluter pays principle: a case study of Ireland. Routledge.
Bennett, N. J. (2016). Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12681
Borowy I. (2017) Negotiating Environment: The Making of the OECD Environment Committee and the Polluter Pays Principle, 1968–1972. In: Leimgruber M., Schmelzer M. (eds) The OECD and the International Political Economy Since 1948. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60243-1_13
Bowling, C., Pierson, E., & Ratté, S. (2016). The common concern of humankind: a potential framework for a new international legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in the high seas. White Paper, 1-15.
Correa, C. M., & Yusuf, A. A. (Eds.). (2016). Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement: The TRIPS Agreement. Kluwer Law International BV.
Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 22(6), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20479
Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183-206.
Faces, T. M. (2016). The Many Faces of Globalization (Vol. 2).
Feng, L., & Liao, W. (2015). Legislation , plans , and policies for prevention and control of air pollution in China : achievements , challenges , and improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(1), 1549–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.013
Forman, L., & Macnaughton, G. (2015). Moving Theory into Practice : Human Rights Impact Assessment of Intellectual Property Rights in Trade Agreements. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(1), 109–138.
Garnett, K., Calster, G. Van, & Reins, L. (2018). Towards an innovation principle : an industry trump or shortening the odds on environmental protection ? Law, Innovation and Technology, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1455023
Glicksman, R. L., Markell, D. L., Buzbee, W. W., Mandelker, D. R., & Bodansky, D. (2019). Environmental protection: law and policy. Aspen Publishers.
Grubb, M., Koch, M., Thomson, K., Sullivan, F., & Munson, A. (2019). The'Earth Summit'Agreements: A Guide and Assessment: An Analysis of the Rio'92 UN Conference on Environment and Development (Vol. 9). Routledge.
Hefferman, C. (2013). Qualitative research approach.Retrieved January, 8, 2019 http://www.explorable.com
Hoch, S., Michaelowa, A., Espelage, A., & Kathrin, A. (2019). Governing complexity : How can the interplay of multilateral environmental agreements be harnessed for effective international market ‑ based climate policy instruments ? Convention on Biological Diversity Common but Differentiated Responsibilities Vienna. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(1), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09455-6
Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40(2016), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007
Jackson, G. (2018). Corporate governance in Germany and Japan: Liberalization pressures and responses during the 1990s. In The End of Diversity? (pp. 261-305). Cornell University Press.
Kanie, N. (2018). Governance with multilateral environmental agreements: A healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation?. In Green Planet Blues (pp. 137-153). Routledge.
Keef, A. S. M. (2018). Whose greed , whose grievance , and whose opportunity ? Effects of foreign direct investments ( FDI ) on internal conflict. World Development, 106(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.012
Khan, M. I., & Chang, Y. C. (2018). Environmental challenges and current practices in China-A thorough analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072547
Khan, S. A. (2016). E-products , E-waste and the Basel Convention : Regulatory Challenges and Impossibilities of International Environmental Law. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 25(2), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12163
Knox, J. (2018). Framework principles on human rights and the environment. UN Human Rights Special Procedures: Special Rapportuer, Independent Experts & Working Groups, 1–25. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Environment/SREnvironment/FrameworkPrinciplesUserFriendlyVersion.pdf%0Ahttp://environmentalrightsdatabase.org/.
Kostka, G. (2016). Command without control : The case of China ’ s environmental target system. Regulation & Governance, 10(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12082
Li, K., Fang, L., & He, L. (2019). How population and energy price affect China ’ s environmental pollution ? Energy Policy, 129(February), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.020
Lim, S., Menaldo, V., & Prakash, A. (2015). Foreign aid, economic globalization, and pollution. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 181-205.
Mackey, B., DellaSala, D. A., Kormos, C., Lindenmayer, D., Kumpel, N., Zimmerman, B.,Watson, J. E. M. (2014). Policy Options for the World’s Primary Forests in Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 139–147. doi:10.1111/conl.12120
Martine, G. (2015). Economy , society and environment in the 21 st century : three pillars or trilemma of sustainability ? Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, 32(3), 433–459.
Meyer, J. (2017). European Review of History : Revue européenne d ’ histoire Who should pay for pollution ? The OECD , the European Communities and the emergence of environmental policy in the early 1970s. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’histoire, 24(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2017.1282427
Mupangavanhu, Y. (2018). THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WITHIN THE CONTINENTAL FREE TRADE AREA IN AFRICA: IS A BALANCE BETWEEN INNOVATION AND TRADE POSSIBLE? 15(4), 14–22.
Mykhnenko, V., & Wolff, M. (2018). State rescaling and economic convergence State rescaling and economic convergence. Regional Studies, 53(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1476754
Nwokoro, C. V., & Chima, F. O. (2017). Impact of Environmental Degradation on Agricultural Production and Poverty in Rural Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 7(2), 6–14. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journal/index/1093
Puplampu, K. P. (2016). The World Trade Organisation, global trade and agriculture. In Beyond the'African Tragedy' (pp. 257-270). Routledge
Samuel, G., Mbabazie, M., & Shukla, J. (2016). Evaluation of factors influencing sustainability of water projects in gahondo: A case of water projects in Muhanga District, Rwanda. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 23(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552071003599996
Shaffer, G., Wolfe, R., & Le, V. (2015). Can Informal Law Discipline Subsidies? Journal of International Economic Law, 18(4), 711–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv043
Sovacool, B. K. (2017). Reviewing , Reforming , and Rethinking Global Energy Subsidies : Towards a Political Economy Research Agenda. Ecological Economics, 135(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.009
Stafford-smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., & Ullah, F. (2016). Integration : the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
Stavropoulos, S., Wall, R., & Xu, Y. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness : evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363858
Tian, W., & Xiang, G. A. O. (2019). ScienceDirect Reflection and operationalization of the common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities principle in the transparency framework under the international climate change regime. Advances in Climate Change Research, 9(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.004
Tien, N. H., Phu, P. P., Phuc, N. T., Duc, L. D. M., & Thuc, T. D. (2019). Sustainable development and environmental management in Vietnam. International Journal of Research in Finance and Management, 3(1), 72-79.
Trachtman, J. P. (2016). The international law of economic migration. A Companion to European Union Law and International Law, 506-518.
Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100093
Valencia, A. (2016). Human rights trade-offs in times of economic growth: The long-term capability impacts of extractive-led development. Springer.
Van Hoecke, M., & Mary, Q. (2016). Methodology of comparative legal research methodology of comparative legal research. November. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000010
Xu, Y., Fan, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, R. (2020). Trade liberalization and haze pollution: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 109(1), 105825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105825
Zhang, M., Liu, X., Ding, Y., & Wang, W. (2019). Science of the Total Environment How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance ? — An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data. Science of the Total Environment, 695(1), 133905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133905
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
